Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/ff1da48c6de0465c8c643b64c4c0ad45-naeemah-ali-jaber-a/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+abstract: 'Purpose The purpose of this paper is (1) to review, analyze and assess
+
+  the existing literature on lean tools selection studies published from
+
+  2005 to 2021; (2) to identify the limitations faced by previous studies;
+
+  and (3) to suggest future works that are necessary to facilitate the
+
+  selection of lean tools. Design/methodology/approach A systematic
+
+  approach was used in order to identify, collect and select the articles.
+
+  Several keywords related to the selection of lean tools were used to
+
+  collect articles from different Scopus indexed journals. Next, the study
+
+  systematically reviewed and analyzed the selected papers to identify the
+
+  lean tools'' selection method and discussed its features and limitations.
+
+  Findings An analysis of the results showed that previous studies have
+
+  adopted two types of methods for selecting lean tools. First, there are
+
+  various traditional methods being used. Second, multi-criteria
+
+  decision-making (MCDM) methods were commonly used in previous studies,
+
+  such as the multi-objective decision-making method (MODM), single
+
+  multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods and hybrid (MCDM).
+
+  Moreover, the study revealed that the lean tools'' selection methods in
+
+  previous studies were based on evaluating the relationship between
+
+  either lean tools and performance metrics or lean tools and waste, or
+
+  both. Research limitations/implications In terms of its theoretical
+
+  value, the study is considered as an extension of the previous
+
+  researches performed on this topic by determining and analyzing the
+
+  features of the most selection methods of lean tools. Unlike previous
+
+  review papers, this review had considered discussing and analyzing the
+
+  characteristics and limitations of these methods. Section 2.2 of this
+
+  paper reviewed some of the categories of MCDM methods as well as some of
+
+  the traditional methods used in the selected previous studies. Section
+
+  2.1 of this paper explained the concept of lean management and its
+
+  application benefits. Further, only three sectors were covered by the
+
+  previous studies in this review paper. This study also provided
+
+  recommendations for future research. Therefore, it provided researchers
+
+  with a good conception of how to conduct the studies on lean tools
+
+  selection. Besides, knowing the methods used in previous studies can
+
+  help researchers develop new methods to select the best set of lean
+
+  tools. That is, this study provided and advanced the existing knowledge
+
+  base for researchers concerning lean tools selection, especially there
+
+  is limited availability of review papers on this topic. Moreover, the
+
+  study showed researchers the importance of the relationship between lean
+
+  tools and indicators or/and performance indicators to determine the
+
+  appropriate set of lean tools so that the results of future studies will
+
+  be more realistic and acceptable. Practical implications Practically,
+
+  manufacturers face a significant challenge when selecting proper lean
+
+  tools. This study may enhance managers, manufacturers and company''s
+
+  knowledge to identify most of the methods used to choose the best set of
+
+  lean tools and what are the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of
+
+  these methods as well as the latest studies that have been adopted in
+
+  this topic. That means this study can direct companies to prioritize the
+
+  application of lean tools depending on either the manufacturing
+
+  performance metrics or/and manufacturing wastes so that they avoid
+
+  incorrect application of lean tools, which will add more non-value added
+
+  activities to operations.
+
+  Therefore companies can decrease the time and cost losses and enhancing
+
+  the quality and efficiency of the performance.
+
+  Correctly implementing the best set of lean tools in companies will lead
+
+  in general to correctly applying lean management in corporations.
+
+  Therefore, these lean tools can boost the economic aspect of companies
+
+  and society through reducing waste, improving performance indicators,
+
+  preserving time and cost, achieving quality, efficiency,
+
+  competitiveness, boosting employee income and improving the gross
+
+  domestic product. The correct lean tool selection reduces customer
+
+  complaints and employee stress and improves work conditions, health,
+
+  safety and labor wellbeing. Besides, the correct lean tools selection
+
+  improves materials usage, energy usage, water usage and decreases liquid
+
+  wastes, solid wastes and air emissions. As a result, the right selection
+
+  of lean tools will have positive effects on both the environment and
+
+  society. The study may also encourage manufacturers and researchers to
+
+  adopt studies on lean tools selection in small- and medium-sized
+
+  companies because the study referred to the importance and participation
+
+  of these kinds of companies in a large proportion of the economy of
+
+  developing countries. Further, the study may encourage some countries
+
+  that have not previously adopted this type of study, academically and
+
+  industrially to conduct lean tools selection studies. Social
+
+  implications As mentioned previously, the correct lean tool selection
+
+  reduces customer complaints and employee stress and improves work
+
+  conditions, health, safety and labor wellbeing. The proper lean tools
+
+  selection improves materials usage, energy usage, water usage and
+
+  decreases liquid wastes, solid wastes and air emissions. As a result,
+
+  the right choice of lean tools will positively affect both the
+
+  environment and society. Originality/value The study expanded the
+
+  efforts of previous studies concerning lean management features. It
+
+  provided an accurate review of most lean tools selection studies
+
+  published from 2005 to 2021 and was not limited to the manufacturing
+
+  sector. It further identified and briefly described the selection
+
+  methods concerning lean tools adopted in each paper.'
+affiliation: 'Wong, KY (Corresponding Author), Univ Teknol Malaysia, Sch Mech Engn,
+  Dept Mfg \& Ind Engn, Skudai, Malaysia.
+
+  Naeemah, Ali Jaber; Wong, Kuan Yew, Univ Teknol Malaysia, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Mfg
+  \& Ind Engn, Skudai, Malaysia.'
+author: Naeemah, Ali Jaber and Wong, Kuan Yew
+author-email: 'j.naeemah@graduate.utm.my
+
+  m-wongky@utm.my'
+author_list:
+- family: Naeemah
+  given: Ali Jaber
+- family: Wong
+  given: Kuan Yew
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-04-2021-0198
+earlyaccessdate: OCT 2021
+eissn: 1758-6658
+files: []
+issn: 1741-0401
+journal: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
+keywords: 'Selection method; Tools selection; Lean management; Lean management
+
+  tools; Lean manufacturing'
+keywords-plus: 'TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM; DECISION-MAKING METHOD; HIERARCHY PROCESS
+  AHP;
+
+  6 SIGMA; SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; MODEL; SMES;
+
+  IMPLEMENTATION'
+language: English
+month: MAR 24
+number: '4'
+number-of-cited-references: '109'
+pages: 1077-1110
+papis_id: af7e7118219e27a63feedd1f2bf7bafb
+ref: Naeemah2023selectionmethods
+researcherid-numbers: Wong, Kuan Yew/D-1577-2010
+tags:
+- review
+times-cited: '1'
+title: 'Selection methods of lean management tools: a review'
+type: Review
+unique-id: WOS:000713662400001
+usage-count-last-180-days: '22'
+usage-count-since-2013: '102'
+volume: '72'
+web-of-science-categories: Management
+year: '2023'