Add wos sample results library
This commit is contained in:
parent
6305e61d1f
commit
19e409ad85
2173 changed files with 235628 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
|
|||
abstract: 'America has become a nation of homebodies. Rates of interstate mobility,
|
||||
|
||||
by most estimates, have been falling for decades. Interstate mobility
|
||||
|
||||
rates are particularly low and stagnant among disadvantaged groups
|
||||
|
||||
despite a growing connection between mobility and economic opportunity.
|
||||
|
||||
Perhaps most importantly, mobility is declining in regions where it is
|
||||
|
||||
needed most. Americans are not leaving places hit by economic crises,
|
||||
|
||||
resulting in unemployment rates and low wages that linger in these areas
|
||||
|
||||
for decades. And people are not moving to rich regions where the highest
|
||||
|
||||
wages are available.
|
||||
|
||||
This Article advances two central claims. First, declining interstate
|
||||
|
||||
mobility rates create problems for federal macroeconomic policymaking.
|
||||
|
||||
Low rates of interstate mobility make it harder for the Federal Reserve
|
||||
|
||||
to meet both sides of its ``dual mandate{''''}: ensuring both stable
|
||||
|
||||
prices and maximum employment. Low interstate mobility rates also impair
|
||||
|
||||
the efficacy and affordability of federal safety net programs that rely
|
||||
|
||||
on state and local participation, and reduce wealth and growth by
|
||||
|
||||
inhibiting agglomeration economies. While determining an optimal rate of
|
||||
|
||||
interstate mobility is difficult, policies that unnaturally inhibit
|
||||
|
||||
interstate moves worsen national economic problems.
|
||||
|
||||
Second, the Article argues that governments, mostly at the state and
|
||||
|
||||
local levels, have created a huge number of legal barriers to interstate
|
||||
|
||||
mobility. Land-use laws and occupational licensing regimes limit entry
|
||||
|
||||
into local and state labor markets. Different eligibility standards for
|
||||
|
||||
public benefits, public employee pension policies, homeownership
|
||||
|
||||
subsidies, state and local tax regimes, and even basic property law
|
||||
|
||||
rules inhibit exit from low-opportunity states and cities. Furthermore,
|
||||
|
||||
building codes, mobile home bans, federal location-based subsidies,
|
||||
|
||||
legal constraints on knocking down houses, and the problematic structure
|
||||
|
||||
of Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy all limit the capacity of failing
|
||||
|
||||
cities to ``shrink{''''} gracefully, directly reducing exit among some
|
||||
|
||||
populations and increasing the economic and social costs of entry limits
|
||||
|
||||
elsewhere.
|
||||
|
||||
Combining these two insights, the Article shows that big questions of
|
||||
|
||||
macroeconomic policy and performance turn on the content of state and
|
||||
|
||||
local policies usually analyzed using microeconomic tools. Many of the
|
||||
|
||||
legal barriers to interstate mobility emerged or became stricter during
|
||||
|
||||
the period in which interstate mobility declined. While causation is
|
||||
|
||||
difficult to determine, public policies developed by state and local
|
||||
|
||||
governments more interested in guaranteeing local population stability
|
||||
|
||||
than ensuring successful macroeconomic conditions either generated or
|
||||
|
||||
failed to stymie falling mobility rates. The Article concludes by
|
||||
|
||||
suggesting how the federal government could address stagnation in
|
||||
|
||||
interstate mobility.'
|
||||
affiliation: 'Schleicher, D (Corresponding Author), Yale Law Sch, Law, New Haven,
|
||||
CT 06520 USA.
|
||||
|
||||
Schleicher, David, Yale Law Sch, Law, New Haven, CT 06520 USA.'
|
||||
author: Schleicher, David
|
||||
author_list:
|
||||
- family: Schleicher
|
||||
given: David
|
||||
da: '2023-09-28'
|
||||
eissn: 1939-8611
|
||||
files: []
|
||||
issn: 0044-0094
|
||||
journal: YALE LAW JOURNAL
|
||||
keywords-plus: 'IMPORT COMPETITION; HOUSING CHOICE; MOBILITY; MARKET; STATE;
|
||||
|
||||
OPPORTUNITY; DECLINE; CITIES; CITY; SEGREGATION'
|
||||
language: English
|
||||
month: OCT
|
||||
number: '1'
|
||||
number-of-cited-references: '301'
|
||||
pages: 78-154
|
||||
papis_id: 31a9f6222679396fa723068177f0df4c
|
||||
ref: Schleicher2017stucklaw
|
||||
times-cited: '59'
|
||||
title: Stuck! The Law and Economics of Residential Stagnation
|
||||
type: Article
|
||||
unique-id: WOS:000414381000002
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013: '9'
|
||||
volume: '127'
|
||||
web-of-science-categories: Law
|
||||
year: '2017'
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue