Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/e6f832d38d042d238e62c31720e1ac33-kristjansson-elizab/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+abstract: 'Background
+
+  Undernutrition contributes to five million deaths of children under five
+
+  each year. Furthermore, throughout the life cycle, undernutrition
+
+  contributes to increased risk of infection, poor cognitive functioning,
+
+  chronic disease, and mortality. It is thus important for decision-makers
+
+  to have evidence about the effectiveness of nutrition interventions for
+
+  young children.
+
+  Objectives
+
+  Primary objective
+
+  1. To assess the effectiveness of supplementary feeding interventions,
+
+  alone or with co-intervention, for improving the physical and
+
+  psychosocial health of disadvantaged children aged three months to five
+
+  years.
+
+  Secondary objectives
+
+  1. To assess the potential of such programmes to reduce socio-economic
+
+  inequalities in undernutrition.
+
+  2. To evaluate implementation and to understand how this may impact on
+
+  outcomes.
+
+  3. To determine whether there are any adverse effects of supplementary
+
+  feeding.
+
+  Search methods
+
+  We searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and seven other databases
+
+  for all available years up to January 2014. We also searched
+
+  ClinicalTrials.gov and several sources of grey literature. In addition,
+
+  we searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews, and
+
+  asked experts in the area about ongoing and unpublished trials.
+
+  Selection criteria
+
+  Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs, controlled clinical
+
+  trials (CCTs), controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs), and
+
+  interrupted time series (ITS) that provided supplementary food (with or
+
+  without co-intervention) to children aged three months to five years,
+
+  from all countries. Adjunctive treatments, such as nutrition education,
+
+  were allowed. Controls had to be untreated.
+
+  Data collection and analysis
+
+  Two or more review authors independently reviewed searches, selected
+
+  studies for inclusion or exclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of
+
+  bias. We conducted meta-analyses for continuous data using the mean
+
+  difference (MD) or the standardised mean difference (SMD) with a 95\%
+
+  confidence interval (CI), correcting for clustering if necessary. We
+
+  analysed studies from low-and middle-income countries and from
+
+  high-income countries separately, and RCTs separately from CBAs. We
+
+  conducted a process evaluation to understand which factors impact on
+
+  effectiveness.
+
+  Main results
+
+  We included 32 studies (21 RCTs and 11 CBAs); 26 of these (16 RCTs and
+
+  10 CBAs) were in meta-analyses. More than 50\% of the RCTs were judged
+
+  to have low risk of bias for random selection and incomplete outcome
+
+  assessment. We judged most RCTS to be unclear for allocation
+
+  concealment, blinding of outcome assessment, and selective outcome
+
+  reporting. Because children and parents knew that they were given food,
+
+  we judged blinding of participants and personnel to be at high risk for
+
+  all studies.
+
+  Growth. Supplementary feeding had positive effects on growth in
+
+  low-andmiddle-income countries. Meta-analysis of the RCTs showed that
+
+  supplemented children gained an average of 0.12 kg more than controls
+
+  over six months (95\% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.18, 9 trials,
+
+  1057 participants, moderate quality evidence). In the CBAs, the effect
+
+  was similar; 0.24 kg over a year (95\% CI 0.09 to 0.39, 1784
+
+  participants, very low quality evidence). In high-income countries, one
+
+  RCT found no difference in weight, but in a CBA with 116 Aboriginal
+
+  children in Australia, the effect on weight was 0.95 kg (95\% CI 0.58 to
+
+  1.33). For height, meta-analysis of nine RCTs revealed that supplemented
+
+  children grew an average of 0.27 cm more over six months than those who
+
+  were not supplemented (95\% CI 0.07 to 0.48, 1463 participants, moderate
+
+  quality evidence). Meta-analysis of seven CBAs showed no evidence of an
+
+  effect (mean difference (MD) 0.52 cm, 95\% CI -0.07 to 1.10, 7 trials,
+
+  1782 participants, very low quality evidence). Meta-analyses of the RCTs
+
+  demonstrated benefits for weight-for-age z-scores (WAZ) (MD 0.15, 95\%
+
+  CI 0.05 to 0.24, 8 trials, 1565 participants, moderate quality
+
+  evidence), and height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) (MD 0.15, 95\% CI 0.06 to
+
+  0.24, 9 trials, 4638 participants, moderate quality evidence), but not
+
+  for weight-for-height z-scores MD 0.10 (95\% CI -0.02 to 0.22, 7 trials,
+
+  4176 participants, moderate quality evidence). Meta-analyses of the CBAs
+
+  showed no effects on WAZ, HAZ, or WHZ (very low quality evidence). We
+
+  found moderate positive effects for haemoglobin (SMD 0.49, 95\% CI 0.07
+
+  to 0.91, 5 trials, 300 participants) in a meta-analysis of the RCTs.
+
+  Psychosocial outcomes. Eight RCTs in low-and middle-income countries
+
+  assessed psychosocial outcomes. Our meta-analysis of two studies showed
+
+  moderate positive effects of feeding on psychomotor development (SMD
+
+  0.41, 95\% CI 0.10 to 0.72, 178 participants). The evidence of effects
+
+  on cognitive development was sparse and mixed.
+
+  We found evidence of substantial leakage. When feeding was given at
+
+  home, children benefited from only 36\% of the energy in the supplement.
+
+  However, when the supplementary food was given in day cares or feeding
+
+  centres, there was less leakage; children took in 85\% of the energy
+
+  provided in the supplement. Supplementary food was generally more
+
+  effective for younger children (less than two years of age) and for
+
+  those who were poorer/less well-nourished. Results for sex were
+
+  equivocal. Our results also suggested that feeding programmes which were
+
+  given in day-care/feeding centres and those which provided a
+
+  moderate-to-high proportion of the recommended daily intake (\% RDI) for
+
+  energy were more effective.
+
+  Authors'' conclusions
+
+  Feeding programmes for young children in low- and middle-income
+
+  countries can work, but good implementation is key.'
+affiliation: 'Kristjansson, E (Corresponding Author), Univ Ottawa, Sch Psychol, Fac
+  Social Sci, Room 407C,Montpetit Hall,125 Univ, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
+
+  Kristjansson, Elizabeth, Univ Ottawa, Sch Psychol, Fac Social Sci, Room 407C,Montpetit
+  Hall,125 Univ, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
+
+  Francis, Damian K., Univ W Indies, Epidemiol Res Unit, Mona Kingston 7, Jamaica.
+
+  Liberato, Selma, Charles Darwin Univ, Nutr Res Team, Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Darwin,
+  NT 0909, Australia.
+
+  Jandu, Maria Benkhalti, Univ Ottawa, Ctr Global Hlth, Inst Populat Hlth, Ottawa,
+  ON, Canada.
+
+  Welch, Vivian, Univ Ottawa, Bruyere Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
+
+  Batal, Malek, Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Nutr, WHO Collaborating Ctr Nutr Changes
+  \& Dev TRANSNUT, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
+
+  Greenhalgh, Trish, Barts \& London Queen Marys Sch Med \& Dent, Ctr Primary Care
+  \& Publ Hlth, London, England.
+
+  Rader, Tamara, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Grp, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
+
+  Noonan, Eamonn, Norwegian Knowledge Ctr Hlth Serv, Oslo, Norway.
+
+  Shea, Beverley; Wells, George A., Univ Ottawa, Dept Epidemiol \& Community Med,
+  Ottawa, ON, Canada.
+
+  Janzen, Laura, Hosp Sick Children, Dept Psychol, 555 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8,
+  Canada.
+
+  Janzen, Laura, Hosp Sick Children, Div Hematol Oncol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.
+
+  Petticrew, Mark, London Sch Hyg \& Trop Med, Dept Social \& Environm Hlth Res, Fac
+  Publ Hlth \& Policy, London WC1, England.'
+article-number: CD009924
+author: Kristjansson, Elizabeth and Francis, Damian K. and Liberato, Selma and Jandu,
+  Maria Benkhalti and Welch, Vivian and Batal, Malek and Greenhalgh, Trish and Rader,
+  Tamara and Noonan, Eamonn and Shea, Beverley and Janzen, Laura and Wells, George
+  A. and Petticrew, Mark
+author-email: kristjan@uottawa.ca
+author_list:
+- family: Kristjansson
+  given: Elizabeth
+- family: Francis
+  given: Damian K.
+- family: Liberato
+  given: Selma
+- family: Jandu
+  given: Maria Benkhalti
+- family: Welch
+  given: Vivian
+- family: Batal
+  given: Malek
+- family: Greenhalgh
+  given: Trish
+- family: Rader
+  given: Tamara
+- family: Noonan
+  given: Eamonn
+- family: Shea
+  given: Beverley
+- family: Janzen
+  given: Laura
+- family: Wells
+  given: George A.
+- family: Petticrew
+  given: Mark
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009924.pub2
+eissn: 1361-6137
+files: []
+issn: 1469-493X
+journal: COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
+keywords-plus: 'USE THERAPEUTIC FOOD; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTATION; MICRONUTRIENT
+
+  SUPPLEMENT; UNDERNOURISHED CHILDREN; LINEAR GROWTH;
+
+  DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; BRAIN-DEVELOPMENT; STUNTED CHILDREN; MALNOURISHED
+
+  CHILDREN; NUTRIENT SUPPLEMENTS'
+language: English
+number: '3'
+number-of-cited-references: '159'
+orcid-numbers: 'Greenhalgh, Trisha/0000-0003-2369-8088
+
+  Welch, Vivian Andrea/0000-0002-5238-7097
+
+  Rader, Tamara/0000-0002-9059-3756'
+papis_id: cc4add6ab5952af355e481729fd247c0
+ref: Kristjansson2015foodsupplementation
+researcherid-numbers: 'Greenhalgh, Trisha/B-1825-2015
+
+  Petticrew, Mark/AAY-6274-2021
+
+  Rader, Tamara/H-9469-2013
+
+  Welch, Vivian Andrea/AAD-9338-2020
+
+  Kristjansson, Elizabeth/AAT-9709-2020
+
+  '
+tags:
+- review
+times-cited: '51'
+title: Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of
+  socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years (Review)
+type: Review
+unique-id: WOS:000375542100028
+usage-count-last-180-days: '3'
+usage-count-since-2013: '22'
+web-of-science-categories: Medicine, General \& Internal
+year: '2015'