Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/e3cd03bac1b5ebf567e4f3c581860438-clayton-stephen-and/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+abstract: 'Background: Employment rates of long-term ill and disabled people in the
+
+  UK are low and 2.63 million are on disability-related state benefits.
+
+  Since the mid-1990 s, UK governments have experimented with a range of
+
+  active labour market policies aimed to move disabled people off benefits
+
+  and into work to reduce the risk of poverty and social exclusion. This
+
+  systematic review asks what employment impact have these interventions
+
+  had and how might they work better?
+
+  Methods: A systematic review of observational and qualitative empirical
+
+  studies and systematic reviews published between 2002 and mid-2008
+
+  reporting employment effects and/or process evaluations of national UK
+
+  government interventions focused on helping long-term sick or disabled
+
+  people (aged 16-64) into the open labour market. This built on our
+
+  previous systematic review which covered the years 1970 to 2001.
+
+  Results: Searches identified 42 studies, 31 of which evaluated
+
+  initiatives with an individual focus (improving an individual''s
+
+  employability or providing financial support in returning to work) while
+
+  11 evaluated initiatives with an environmental focus (directed at the
+
+  employment environment or changing the behaviour of employers). This
+
+  paper synthesises evidence from the 31 studies with an individual focus.
+
+  The use of personal advisors and individual case management in these
+
+  schemes helped some participants back to work. Qualitative studies,
+
+  however, revealed that time pressures and job outcome targets influenced
+
+  advisors to select `easier-to-place'' claimants into programmes and also
+
+  inhibited the development of mutual trust, which was needed for
+
+  individual case management to work effectively. Financial incentives can
+
+  help with lasting transitions into work, but the incentives were often
+
+  set too low or were too short-term to have an effect. Many of the
+
+  studies suffered from selection bias into these programmes of more
+
+  work-ready claimants. Even though these were national programmes, they
+
+  had very low awareness and take-up rates, making it unlikely that a
+
+  population-level impact would be achieved even if effective for
+
+  participants.
+
+  Conclusions: The evidence reveals barriers and facilitators for the
+
+  effective implementation of these types of interventions that could
+
+  inform the continuing welfare reforms. The evidence points towards the
+
+  need for more long-term, sustained and staged support for those furthest
+
+  from the labour market.'
+affiliation: 'Clayton, S (Corresponding Author), Univ Liverpool, Div Publ Hlth, Liverpool
+  L69 3BX, Merseyside, England.
+
+  Clayton, Stephen; Povall, Sue; Whitehead, Margaret, Univ Liverpool, Div Publ Hlth,
+  Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England.
+
+  Bambra, Clare, Univ Durham, Wolfson Res Inst, Durham DH1 3HP, England.'
+article-number: '170'
+author: Clayton, Stephen and Bambra, Clare and Gosling, Rachael and Povall, Sue and
+  Misso, Kate and Whitehead, Margaret
+author-email: spclay@liv.ac.uk
+author_list:
+- family: Clayton
+  given: Stephen
+- family: Bambra
+  given: Clare
+- family: Gosling
+  given: Rachael
+- family: Povall
+  given: Sue
+- family: Misso
+  given: Kate
+- family: Whitehead
+  given: Margaret
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-170
+files: []
+issn: 1471-2458
+journal: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
+keywords-plus: WELFARE-TO-WORK; BENEFIT
+language: English
+month: MAR 21
+number-of-cited-references: '55'
+orcid-numbers: 'Bambra, Clare l/0000-0002-1294-6851
+
+  Clayton, Stephen/0000-0003-2823-1495
+
+  Misso, Kate/0000-0002-4924-4327'
+papis_id: dd895444604112425bf71341bcac5675
+ref: Clayton2011assemblingevidence
+researcherid-numbers: 'Clayton, Stephen/AAD-6360-2020
+
+  Bambra, Clare l/C-1392-2010
+
+  Clayton, Stephen/GZG-4631-2022
+
+  Misso, Kate/IYJ-4543-2023
+
+  Misso, Kate/D-2060-2016'
+tags:
+- relevant
+- review
+times-cited: '40'
+title: 'Assembling the evidence jigsaw: insights from a systematic review of UK studies
+  of individual-focused return to work initiatives for disabled and long-term ill
+  people'
+type: Review
+unique-id: WOS:000289072800001
+usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
+usage-count-since-2013: '31'
+volume: '11'
+web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health
+year: '2011'