Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/cd9e2c2a6cd469ee8800a795809d1fb9-moore-sian-and-onar/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+abstract: 'Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to reassert the
+
+  persistent association of the decline in collective bargaining with the
+
+  increase in income inequality, the fall in the share of wages in
+
+  national income and deterioration in macroeconomic performance in the
+
+  UK; and second, to present case studies affirming concrete outcomes of
+
+  organisational collective bargaining for workers, in terms of pay, job
+
+  quality, working hours and work-life balance.
+
+  Design/methodology/approach The paper is based upon two methodological
+
+  approaches. First, econometric analyses using industry-level and
+
+  firm-level data for advanced and emerging economies testing the
+
+  relationship between declining union density, collective bargaining
+
+  coverage and the fall in the share of wages in national income. Second,
+
+  it reports on ten in-depth case studies of collective bargaining each
+
+  based upon analysis of collective bargaining agreements plus in-depth
+
+  interviews with the actors party to them: in total, 16 trade union
+
+  officers, 16 members and 11 employer representatives. Findings There is
+
+  robust evidence of the effects of different measures of bargaining power
+
+  on the labour share including union density, welfare state retrenchment,
+
+  minimum wages and female employment. The case studies appear to address
+
+  a legacy of deregulated industrial relations. A number demonstrate the
+
+  reinvigoration of collective bargaining at the organisational and
+
+  sectoral level, addressing the two-tier workforce and contractual
+
+  differentiation, alongside the consequences of government pay policies
+
+  for equality.
+
+  Originality/value The paper indicates that there may be limits to
+
+  employer commitment to deregulated employment relations. The emergence
+
+  of new or reinvigorated collective agreements may represent a concession
+
+  by employers that a ``free{''''}, individualised, deinstitutionalised,
+
+  precarious approach to industrial relations, based on wage suppression
+
+  and work intensification, is not in their interests in the long run.'
+affiliation: 'Moore, S (Corresponding Author), Univ Greenwich, Business Sch, London,
+  England.
+
+  Moore, Sian; Onaran, Ozlem; Guschanski, Alexander; Antunes, Bethania; Symon, Graham,
+  Univ Greenwich, Business Sch, London, England.'
+author: Moore, Sian and Onaran, Ozlem and Guschanski, Alexander and Antunes, Bethania
+  and Symon, Graham
+author-email: s.moore@greenwich.ac.uk
+author_list:
+- family: Moore
+  given: Sian
+- family: Onaran
+  given: Ozlem
+- family: Guschanski
+  given: Alexander
+- family: Antunes
+  given: Bethania
+- family: Symon
+  given: Graham
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1108/ER-09-2018-0256
+eissn: 1758-7069
+files: []
+issn: 0142-5455
+journal: EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
+keywords: Collective bargaining; Wages; Trade unions
+keywords-plus: INCOME-DISTRIBUTION; GROWTH; DECLINE; POLICY; WAGE
+language: English
+month: FEB 11
+number: 2, SI
+number-of-cited-references: '51'
+orcid-numbers: Antunes, Bethania/0000-0003-3589-2347
+pages: 279-295
+papis_id: b21b6f4dbae191294f6203776abc519f
+ref: Moore2019resiliencecollective
+times-cited: '6'
+title: The resilience of collective bargaining - a renewed logic for joint regulation?
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000462071200002
+usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
+usage-count-since-2013: '31'
+volume: '41'
+web-of-science-categories: Industrial Relations \& Labor; Management
+year: '2019'