Add wos sample results library
This commit is contained in:
parent
6305e61d1f
commit
19e409ad85
2173 changed files with 235628 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
|||
abstract: 'Not long ago, economists denied the existence of monopsony in labor
|
||||
|
||||
markets. Today, scholars are talking about using antitrust law to
|
||||
|
||||
counter employer wage -setting power. While concerns about inequality,
|
||||
|
||||
stagnant wages, and excessive firm power are certainly to be welcomed,
|
||||
|
||||
this sudden about-face in theory, evidence, and policy runs the risk of
|
||||
|
||||
overlooking some important concerns. The purpose of this Essay is to
|
||||
|
||||
address these concerns and, more critically, to discuss some tensions
|
||||
|
||||
be-tween antitrust and labor law, a more traditional method for
|
||||
|
||||
regulating labor mar-kets. Part I addresses a question raised in the
|
||||
|
||||
very recent literature, about why an-titrust has not been a traditional
|
||||
|
||||
tool of labor market regulation. Part II addresses some drawbacks in the
|
||||
|
||||
social objectives of antitrust regulation, namely, the so-called
|
||||
|
||||
consumer welfare standard or, as proposed for the labor market, the
|
||||
|
||||
worker wel-fare standard, and suggests an alternative standard. Finally,
|
||||
|
||||
Part III asks whether antitrust is an appropriate response to labor
|
||||
|
||||
market monopsony. That Part shows that there are some significant
|
||||
|
||||
tensions between antitrust and labor law and, given those tensions,
|
||||
|
||||
explains why more traditional methods of wage regulation, collective
|
||||
|
||||
bargaining, and even minimum wage legislation offer some distinct
|
||||
|
||||
advantages.'
|
||||
affiliation: 'Dimick, M (Corresponding Author), Univ Buffalo, Sch Law, Law, Buffalo,
|
||||
NY 14260 USA.
|
||||
|
||||
Dimick, Matthew, Univ Buffalo, Sch Law, Law, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA.'
|
||||
author: Dimick, Matthew
|
||||
author_list:
|
||||
- family: Dimick
|
||||
given: Matthew
|
||||
da: '2023-09-28'
|
||||
files: []
|
||||
issn: 0041-9494
|
||||
journal: UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW
|
||||
keywords-plus: 'FAST-FOOD INDUSTRY; MINIMUM-WAGE; LEGAL RULES; INCOME-TAX; MONOPOLISTIC
|
||||
|
||||
COMPETITION; UNITED-STATES; NEW-JERSEY; EMPLOYMENT; INEQUALITY;
|
||||
|
||||
EFFICIENCY'
|
||||
language: English
|
||||
month: MAR
|
||||
number: '2'
|
||||
number-of-cited-references: '134'
|
||||
pages: 379-436
|
||||
papis_id: da4d4c3f6110b0bc18288dbe7cc5587a
|
||||
ref: Dimick2023conflictlaws
|
||||
times-cited: '0'
|
||||
title: Conflict of Laws? Tensions Between Antitrust and Labor Law
|
||||
type: Article
|
||||
unique-id: WOS:000952272400004
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days: '1'
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013: '1'
|
||||
volume: '90'
|
||||
web-of-science-categories: Law
|
||||
year: '2023'
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue