Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/bc3b56b60c1e29239ea192e99249b8ce-rothstein-bo-and-us/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+abstract: 'The importance of social trust has become widely accepted in the social
+
+  sciences. A number of explanations have been put forward for the stark
+
+  variation in social trust among countries. Among these, participation in
+
+  voluntary associations received most attention. Yet there is scant
+
+  evidence that participation can lead to trust. In this article, the
+
+  authors examine a variable that has not gotten the attention it deserves
+
+  in the discussion about the sources of generalized trust, namely,
+
+  equality. They conceptualize equality along two dimensions: economic
+
+  equality and equality of opportunity. The omission of both these
+
+  dimensions of equality in the social capital literature is peculiar for
+
+  several reasons. First, it is obvious that the countries that score
+
+  highest on social trust also rank highest on economic equality, namely,
+
+  the Nordic countries, the Netherlands, and Canada. Second, these
+
+  countries have put a lot of effort in creating equality of opportunity,
+
+  not least in regard to their policies for public education, health care,
+
+  labor market opportunities, and (more recently) gender equality The
+
+  argument for increasing social trust by reducing inequality has largely
+
+  been ignored in the policy debates about social trust. Social capital
+
+  research has to a large extent been used by several governments and
+
+  policy organizations to send a message to people that the bad things in
+
+  their society are caused by too little volunteering. The policy
+
+  implications that follow from the authors'' research is that the low
+
+  levels of trust and social capital that plague many countries are caused
+
+  by too little government action to reduce inequality. However, many
+
+  countries with low levels of social trust and social capital may be
+
+  stuck in what is known as a social trap. The logic of such a situation
+
+  is the following. Social trust will not increase because massive social
+
+  inequality, prevails, but the public policies that could remedy this
+
+  situation cannot be established precisely because there is a genuine
+
+  lack of trust. This lack of trust concerns both ``other people{''''} and
+
+  the government institutions that are needed to implement universal
+
+  policies.'
+affiliation: 'Rothstein, B (Corresponding Author), Univ Gothenburg, Qual Govt Inst,
+  Gothenburg, Sweden.
+
+  Univ Gothenburg, Qual Govt Inst, Gothenburg, Sweden.
+
+  Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA.'
+author: Rothstein, Bo and Uslaner, Eric M.
+author-email: 'bo.rothstein@pol.qu.se
+
+  euslaner@gypt.umd.edu'
+author_list:
+- family: Rothstein
+  given: Bo
+- family: Uslaner
+  given: Eric M.
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1353/wp.2006.0022
+eissn: 1086-3338
+files: []
+issn: 0043-8871
+journal: WORLD POLITICS
+language: English
+month: OCT
+number: '1'
+number-of-cited-references: '85'
+pages: 41+
+papis_id: cb261eab9958b06a88c1d256e6e8bda7
+ref: Rothstein2005allall
+times-cited: '727'
+title: All for all - Equality, corruption, and social trust
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000238854300003
+usage-count-last-180-days: '3'
+usage-count-since-2013: '264'
+volume: '58'
+web-of-science-categories: International Relations; Political Science
+year: '2005'