Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/84296ef069d3051f375faee8e87e4235-park-sunggeun-etha/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+abstract: 'Providers of public health and social services ({''''}providers{''''})
+
+  develop and deliver services by engaging in interprofessional
+
+  collaboration (IPC), from seeking external advice to making referrals
+
+  and linkages to various social and public health services. Providers
+
+  collaborate with consumers of social and public health services
+
+  ({''''}consumers{''''}) and student interns (e.g., social work, public
+
+  health) to explore, determine, and deliver relevant services through a
+
+  process referred to as co-production. Both IPC and co-production are
+
+  widespread strategies with the potential to improve service
+
+  accessibility and quality. However, the intersection of co-production
+
+  and IPC remains understudied. This study examines factors that influence
+
+  co-production in IPC among service providers, consumers, and student
+
+  interns. We used cross-sectional survey data from an NIMH-funded study,
+
+  including 379 providers in 36 HIV-service organizations in New York
+
+  City. We examined the relationships between providers'' perspectives on
+
+  co-production in IPC and multiple provider- and organization-level
+
+  variables using random-effects logistic regression. Most respondents
+
+  said that consumers and students in their agency participate in IPC on
+
+  the issues that concern them. Providers who perceive greater flexibility
+
+  in the IPC process were more likely to agree that their organizations''
+
+  providers co-produced IPC. Organizational service offerings (i.e.,
+
+  multilingual services, a comprehensive range of services), job
+
+  positions, and full-time employment status were strong predictors of
+
+  co-production. Our findings indicate that intentional and inclusive
+
+  models of flexible IPC are needed. Fostering co-production in the HIV
+
+  service field requires more institutional support and incentives for
+
+  organizations, providers, and student interns. Implications for research
+
+  and practice are discussed.'
+affiliation: 'Park, S (Corresponding Author), Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work, 1080
+  S Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
+
+  Park, Sunggeun (Ethan); Pinto, Rogerio Meireles, Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work,
+  1080 S Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.'
+author: Park, Sunggeun (Ethan) and Pinto, Rogerio Meireles
+author-email: sunggeun@umich.edu
+author_list:
+- family: Park
+  given: Sunggeun (Ethan)
+- family: Pinto
+  given: Rogerio Meireles
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1080/19371918.2021.1974638
+earlyaccessdate: SEP 2021
+eissn: 1937-190X
+files: []
+issn: 1937-1918
+journal: SOCIAL WORK IN PUBLIC HEALTH
+keywords: 'Co-production; service consumer; student intern; interprofessional
+
+  collaboration; social and health services; HIV; AIDS'
+keywords-plus: 'PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; UNITED-STATES; OUTCOMES; SYSTEMS;
+
+  RECOMMENDATIONS; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; CAPACITY;
+
+  BARRIERS'
+language: English
+month: JAN 2
+number: '1'
+number-of-cited-references: '60'
+pages: 71-83
+papis_id: 0fa1fb55eb864adbac7d175480929572
+ref: Park2022factorsthat
+times-cited: '0'
+title: 'Factors that Influence Co-production among Student Interns, Consumers, and
+  Providers of Social and Public Health Services: Implications for Interprofessional
+  Collaboration and Training'
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000695363700001
+usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
+usage-count-since-2013: '49'
+volume: '37'
+web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health; Social Work
+year: '2022'