Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/6b51d40297ddfcc90f0d7b1765b64c19-kozhimannil-katy-ba/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+abstract: 'Background: Rising rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery,
+
+  especially when used without a medical reason, have generated concern
+
+  among clinicians, women, and policymakers. Whether employment status
+
+  affects pregnant women''s childbirth-related care is not known. We
+
+  estimated the relationship between prenatal employment and obstetric
+
+  procedures, distinguishing whether women reported that the induction or
+
+  cesarean was performed for medical reasons.
+
+  Methods: Using data from a nationally representative sample of women who
+
+  gave birth in U. S. hospitals (n = 1,573), we used propensity score
+
+  matching to reduce potential bias from nonrandom selection into
+
+  employment. Outcomes were cesarean delivery and labor induction, with
+
+  and without a self-reported medical reason. Exposure was prenatal
+
+  employment status (full-time employment, not employed). We conducted
+
+  separate analyses for unmatched and matched cohorts using multivariable
+
+  regression models.
+
+  Findings: There were no differences in labor induction based on
+
+  employment status. In unmatched analyses, employed women had higher odds
+
+  of cesarean delivery overall (adjusted odds ratio {[}AOR], 1.45; p =
+
+  .046) and cesarean delivery without medical reason (AOR, 1.94; p =
+
+  .024). Adding an interaction term between employment and college
+
+  education revealed no effects on cesarean delivery without medical
+
+  reason. There were no differences in cesarean delivery by employment
+
+  status in the propensity score-matched analysis.
+
+  Conclusions: Full-time prenatal employment is associated with higher
+
+  odds of cesarean delivery, but this association was not explained by
+
+  socioeconomic status and no longer existed after accounting for
+
+  sociodemographic differences by matching women employed full time with
+
+  similar women not employed during pregnancy. Copyright (C) 2014 by the
+
+  Jacobs Institute of Women''s Health. Published by Elsevier Inc.'
+affiliation: 'Kozhimannil, KB (Corresponding Author), Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth,
+  Div Hlth Policy \& Management, 420 Delaware St SE,MMC 729, Minneapolis, MN 55455
+  USA.
+
+  Kozhimannil, Katy Backes; Attanasio, Laura B., Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div
+  Hlth Policy \& Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
+
+  Johnson, Pamela Jo, Med Res Inst, Minnetonka, MN USA.
+
+  Gjerdingen, Dwenda K., Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Family Med \& Community Hlth,
+  St Paul, MN 55108 USA.
+
+  McGovern, Patricia M., Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Environm Hlth Sci, Minneapolis,
+  MN USA.'
+author: Kozhimannil, Katy Backes and Attanasio, Laura B. and Johnson, Pamela Jo and
+  Gjerdingen, Dwenda K. and McGovern, Patricia M.
+author-email: kbk@umn.edu
+author_list:
+- family: Kozhimannil
+  given: Katy Backes
+- family: Attanasio
+  given: Laura B.
+- family: Johnson
+  given: Pamela Jo
+- family: Gjerdingen
+  given: Dwenda K.
+- family: McGovern
+  given: Patricia M.
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.06.010
+eissn: 1878-4321
+files: []
+issn: 1049-3867
+journal: WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES
+keywords-plus: 'MATERNITY LEAVE; BIRTH OUTCOMES; SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES;
+
+  AMERICAN-COLLEGE; UNITED-STATES; CHILD-HEALTH; HIGH-QUALITY; SCORE;
+
+  WORK; RISK'
+language: English
+month: SEP-OCT
+number: '5'
+number-of-cited-references: '58'
+orcid-numbers: Johnson, Pamela Jo/0000-0003-3034-1378
+pages: 469-476
+papis_id: 023e7e2d746475e897aa66e698bddff9
+ref: Kozhimannil2014employmentpregnancy
+times-cited: '1'
+title: 'Employment During Pregnancy and Obstetric Intervention Without Medical Reason:
+  Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery'
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000345157500002
+usage-count-last-180-days: '1'
+usage-count-since-2013: '4'
+volume: '24'
+web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health; Women's Studies
+year: '2014'