Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/677c3272a8ba2fbe4eafc48d752f764d-berens-sarah/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+abstract: 'This article examines how the informal sector, as a group of potential
+
+  `free riders'' for public welfare goods, relates to individual social
+
+  policy preferences in low-and middle-income countries. The exclusion
+
+  hypothesis proposes that a large informal sector lowers the preferences
+
+  from formal workers and the middle-and high-income groups for social
+
+  services to be provided by the state, and raises these groups''
+
+  preferences for public welfare goods to become club goods. In contrast,
+
+  the prospect hypothesis argues that formal workers, particularly the
+
+  middle-income group, ally themselves to the informal sector to insure
+
+  against the risk of future employment in informality. The study examines
+
+  individual preferences for the provision of pensions and health care by
+
+  either the state or private enterprises. The two competing hypotheses
+
+  are tested with a hierarchical model using survey data from Latin
+
+  America for 1995, 1998 and 2008. The findings offer support for the
+
+  exclusion hypothesis.'
+affiliation: 'Berens, S (Corresponding Author), Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
+
+  Berens, Sarah, Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany.'
+author: Berens, Sarah
+author-email: sarah.berens@uni-koeln.de
+author_list:
+- family: Berens
+  given: Sarah
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1093/ser/mwu039
+eissn: 1475-147X
+files: []
+issn: 1475-1461
+journal: SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW
+keywords: 'Social policy; informal sector; preferences; income; Latin America;
+
+  rational choice'
+keywords-plus: 'INCOME INEQUALITY; LATIN-AMERICA; SOCIAL INSURANCE; LABOR-MARKETS;
+
+  POLITICS; POLICY; INSTITUTIONS; DEMOCRACIES; COUNTRIES; REFORM'
+language: English
+month: OCT
+number: '4'
+number-of-cited-references: '57'
+pages: 651-678
+papis_id: f3a754fb07c61cd8787dba7dd3253e6b
+ref: Berens2015exclusioncalculating
+times-cited: '18'
+title: Between exclusion and calculating solidarity? Preferences for private versus
+  public welfare provision and the size of the informal sector
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000369533700002
+usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
+usage-count-since-2013: '34'
+volume: '13'
+web-of-science-categories: Economics; Political Science; Sociology
+year: '2015'