Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/628f402819db49e1116c670d421c4a4e-ravinskaya-margarit/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+abstract: 'Purpose Heterogeneity in work participation (WP) outcomes measurements
+
+  hampers large scale evidence synthesis in systematic reviews of trials.
+
+  In this survey we explore authors'' reasons for choosing specific WP
+
+  outcomes and their measurement methods, including employment status,
+
+  absence from work, at-work productivity loss, and employability. Methods
+
+  We contacted authors of 260 trials and 69 systematic reviews and asked
+
+  closed and open-ended questions about previously used WP outcomes and
+
+  measurement methods as well as their opinion on the best way to measure
+
+  WP. Results In total, 91 authors from a wide range of professional
+
+  backgrounds completed the survey. The majority of authors (86\%) chose
+
+  WP outcomes based on their use in previous similar studies. In most
+
+  studies (88\%), patients had not been involved in the process of
+
+  selecting the WP outcome. Authors judged feasibility to be an important
+
+  factor for choosing a measurement instrument (67\%). Additionally, valid
+
+  measurement tools should be available, easy to administer and not too
+
+  time consuming. Although authors preferred registry data for long term
+
+  follow-up, the availability and validity of registries was seen as a
+
+  barrier. Most of the reviewers (72\%) struggled to pool data because of
+
+  variation in follow-up times and cut off points and varying definitions
+
+  of work outcomes. Almost all (92\%) respondents support the use of a
+
+  Core Outcome Set for Work. Conclusions There is strong support from
+
+  authors of trials and systematic reviews to develop a core outcome set
+
+  on work participation outcomes for the evaluation of interventions.'
+affiliation: 'Ravinskaya, M (Corresponding Author), Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr,
+  Coronel Inst Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst,Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam,
+  Netherlands.
+
+  Ravinskaya, Margarita, Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Coronel Inst Occupat Hlth,
+  Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst,Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
+
+  Verbeek, Jos H.; Hulshof, Carel T. J.; Hoving, Jan L., Univ Amsterdam, Locat Acad
+  Med Ctr, Coronel Inst Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst,Amsterdam UMC,
+  Amsterdam, Netherlands.
+
+  Langendam, Miranda W., Univ Amsterdam, Locat Acad Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res
+  Inst, Dept Epidemiol \& Data Sci,Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
+
+  Madan, Ira, Kings Coll London, Ctr Musculoskeletal Hlth \& Work, Guys \& St Thomas
+  NHS Trust \& Fac Life Sci \& Med, London, England.
+
+  Kunz, Regina, Univ Basel, Acad Unit EbIM, Dept Clin Res, Evidence Based Insurance
+  Med, Basel, Switzerland.
+
+  Verstappen, Suzanne M. M., Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med \& Hlth, Ctr Epidemiol
+  Versus Arthrit, Manchester, Lancs, England.
+
+  Verstappen, Suzanne M. M., Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci
+  Ctr, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England.
+
+  Verstappen, Suzanne M. M., Univ Southampton, MRC Versus Arthrit Ctr Musculoskeletal
+  Hlth \& Wor, Southampton, Hants, England.'
+author: Ravinskaya, Margarita and Verbeek, Jos H. and Langendam, Miranda W. and Madan,
+  Ira and Verstappen, Suzanne M. M. and Kunz, Regina and Hulshof, Carel T. J. and
+  Hoving, Jan L.
+author-email: m.ravinskaya@amsterdamumc.nl
+author_list:
+- family: Ravinskaya
+  given: Margarita
+- family: Verbeek
+  given: Jos H.
+- family: Langendam
+  given: Miranda W.
+- family: Madan
+  given: Ira
+- family: Verstappen
+  given: Suzanne M. M.
+- family: Kunz
+  given: Regina
+- family: Hulshof
+  given: Carel T. J.
+- family: Hoving
+  given: Jan L.
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10031-0
+earlyaccessdate: MAR 2022
+eissn: 1573-3688
+files: []
+issn: 1053-0487
+journal: JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION
+keywords: 'Survey; Return-to-work; Worker participation; Vocational rehabilitation;
+
+  Outcome studies'
+keywords-plus: 'RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CORE OUTCOME DOMAINS; RETURN-TO-WORK;
+
+  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES; PRODUCTIVITY LOSS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; DISABILITY;
+
+  ABILITY'
+language: English
+month: DEC
+number: '4'
+number-of-cited-references: '37'
+orcid-numbers: 'Hoving, Jan L/0000-0002-0461-4013
+
+  Ravinskaya, Margarita/0000-0003-4280-8887'
+pages: 620-628
+papis_id: f0e8c7276c8d795ff739f1ea71530189
+ref: Ravinskaya2022preferredmethods
+researcherid-numbers: 'Hoving, Jan L/O-2235-2013
+
+  hulshof, carel tj/B-3435-2013
+
+  '
+times-cited: '5'
+title: 'Preferred Methods of Measuring Work Participation: An International Survey
+  Among Trialists and Cochrane Systematic Reviewers'
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000773820900001
+usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
+usage-count-since-2013: '1'
+volume: '32'
+web-of-science-categories: Rehabilitation; Social Issues
+year: '2022'