Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/43e7035c3d210baf371ba2ce7025e993-scott-peter/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+abstract: 'Despite its importance to gender inequality, household incomes, and
+
+  labor markets, the reasons behind Britain being one of the last major
+
+  Western nations to introduce equal pay have been relatively neglected.
+
+  This article first examines the campaign for equal pay from the late
+
+  Victorian era to its eventual introduction in 1970. Economists predicted
+
+  that equal pay would produce substantial female unemployment, but policy
+
+  makers correctly doubted this-as data collected from early adopters in
+
+  West Europe and North America showed no significant rise in female
+
+  unemployment. Female employment rose substantially during Britain''s
+
+  equal pay implementation-while, in contrast to broadly static earnings
+
+  differentials from 1950 to 1970, there was a significant reduction in
+
+  the gender pay gap, followed by a longer-term trend of narrowing
+
+  differentials. This article explores why equal pay expanded female
+
+  employment, given the absence of any sudden rise in women workers
+
+  productivity or substantial acceleration of structural change in favor
+
+  of female-employing sectors. The article finds that equal pay compelled
+
+  employers to reevaluate the real worth of female workers based on their
+
+  substantial relative human capital growth since 1945. This had not
+
+  hitherto been reflected in relative earnings, owing to barriers such as
+
+  segmented labor markets, monopsonistic employers, and collective
+
+  bargaining procedures that fossilized traditional gender pay
+
+  differentials.'
+affiliation: 'Scott, P (Corresponding Author), Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch,
+  Int Business Hist, Reading RG6 6AH, Berks, England.
+
+  Scott, Peter, Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Int Business Hist, Reading RG6
+  6AH, Berks, England.'
+article-number: PII S1467222722000441
+author: Scott, Peter
+author-email: p.m.scott@henley.ac.uk
+author_list:
+- family: Scott
+  given: Peter
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1017/eso.2022.44
+earlyaccessdate: JAN 2023
+eissn: 1467-2235
+files: []
+issn: 1467-2227
+journal: ENTERPRISE \& SOCIETY
+keywords: 'Equal pay; Gender inequality; Gender discrimination; Imperfect labour
+
+  markets'
+keywords-plus: 'RELATIVE PAY; MINIMUM-WAGES; LABOR-MARKET; EMPLOYMENT; LEGISLATION;
+
+  WORKING; IMPACT'
+language: English
+month: 2023 JAN 23
+number-of-cited-references: '46'
+orcid-numbers: Scott, Peter/0000-0003-1230-9040
+papis_id: b2507dbad033dd5a919107db4a908e9d
+ref: Scott2023pinmoney
+times-cited: '0'
+title: 'From ``Pin Money″ to Careers: Britain''s Late Move to Equal Pay, Its Consequences,
+  and Broader Implications'
+type: Article; Early Access
+unique-id: WOS:000917492400001
+usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
+usage-count-since-2013: '4'
+web-of-science-categories: Business; History Of Social Sciences
+year: '2023'