Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/41f7ec6ca297a369ad8655377bb09496-giannotti-mariana-a/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+abstract: 'Accessibility measures have been extensively used to explore the
+
+  outcomes of the spatial distribution of transport, jobs, and population
+
+  groups in cities. Despite its wide use, identifying the population
+
+  groups that most benefit from accessibility is not straightforward and
+
+  different metrics might result in different conclusions. The present
+
+  work aims to analyze the potential bias of using gravity-based measures
+
+  based on revealed mobilities to identify job accessibility inequalities.
+
+  By looking at two large and very different regions, the municipality of
+
+  Sa similar to o Paulo (SP) and the Greater London Area (GLA), we argue
+
+  that distance decay functions built from current trip behaviors should
+
+  be carefully used in evaluations of accessibility inequalities because
+
+  it may underestimate disparities between socio-occupational groups and
+
+  also result in a misleading interpretation of impedance factors. Two
+
+  distinct approaches were implemented to support those claims. We first
+
+  estimate group-specific distance decay functions, considering only
+
+  travel time. Secondly, we consider both travel time and travel cost
+
+  relative to income to estimate zone-specific and city-specific distance
+
+  decay functions for each one of the study areas. The population of both
+
+  cases studies was stratified according to the NS-SEC standard to select
+
+  the highest and the lowest socio-occupational groups and to explore job
+
+  accessibility inequalities. It was found that higherlevel and
+
+  lower-level socio-occupational groups of SP and GLA present striking
+
+  differences in terms of travel times and relative travel costs, with SP
+
+  being more unequal. By applying the distance decay function of the
+
+  lowest level socio-occupational group to the calculations of the job
+
+  accessibility of the highest level group, and by adding travel cost to
+
+  the analysis, we highlight inconsistencies between gravity-based
+
+  accessibility calculations and theory, as trips taken by different
+
+  groups can be mistakenly associated with willingness to travel. From a
+
+  policy perspective, our findings emphasize that accessibility
+
+  inequalities in large urban centers, especially in the Global South, can
+
+  be underestimated if revealed mobilities are considered to represent the
+
+  willingness to travel and by not taking into account the relative cost
+
+  of travel.'
+affiliation: 'Giannotti, M (Corresponding Author), Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Metropolitan
+  Studies, Lab Geospatial Anal Polytech Sch, BR-05508070 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
+
+  Giannotti, Mariana; Tomasiello, Diego B.; Bittencourt, Taina A., Univ Sao Paulo,
+  Ctr Metropolitan Studies, Lab Geospatial Anal Polytech Sch, BR-05508070 Sao Paulo,
+  SP, Brazil.'
+article-number: '103337'
+author: Giannotti, Mariana and Tomasiello, Diego B. and Bittencourt, Taina A.
+author-email: mariana.giannotti@usp.br
+author_list:
+- family: Giannotti
+  given: Mariana
+- family: Tomasiello
+  given: Diego B.
+- family: Bittencourt
+  given: Taina A.
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103337
+earlyaccessdate: APR 2022
+eissn: 1873-1236
+files: []
+issn: 0966-6923
+journal: JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
+keywords: Accessibility measures; Inequalities; Public transport
+keywords-plus: 'JOB ACCESSIBILITY; TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY; SPATIAL EQUITY; SAO-PAULO;
+
+  EDUCATION; COST; TIME; CITY; CARE'
+language: English
+month: MAY
+number-of-cited-references: '44'
+papis_id: c241d793289e08478922023534db352b
+ref: Giannotti2022biasestimating
+times-cited: '6'
+title: The bias in estimating accessibility inequalities using gravity-based metrics
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000798115800003
+usage-count-last-180-days: '7'
+usage-count-since-2013: '13'
+volume: '101'
+web-of-science-categories: Economics; Geography; Transportation
+year: '2022'