Add wos sample results library
This commit is contained in:
parent
6305e61d1f
commit
19e409ad85
2173 changed files with 235628 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
|
|||
abstract: 'Effective and full integration of people with disability into society is
|
||||
|
||||
deeply related to their integration into the labour market. The United
|
||||
|
||||
Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities adopted in
|
||||
|
||||
2006 triggered a change in the conception of disability towards a social
|
||||
|
||||
approach, especially in terms of their human rights and their
|
||||
|
||||
integration in society. One of the key elements of this integration is
|
||||
|
||||
the participation of persons with disabilities in the different spheres
|
||||
|
||||
of society with equal opportunities. In particular, their integration in
|
||||
|
||||
the labour market is a mayor challenge not only from the personal
|
||||
|
||||
development perspective, but also in terms of their autonomy and
|
||||
|
||||
independence.
|
||||
|
||||
Irrespective of the debate on the advantages and disadvantages of the
|
||||
|
||||
different strategies aimed at integrating persons with disability into
|
||||
|
||||
the labour market, further research is necessary on the factors that
|
||||
|
||||
encourage that integration and highlight entry into an ordinary labour
|
||||
|
||||
market, which should be the ultimate objective of integration policies
|
||||
|
||||
for persons with a disability.
|
||||
|
||||
The values shared by Social Economy enterprises generate a
|
||||
|
||||
differentiated behaviour in relation to their staff composition, the
|
||||
|
||||
work conditions, their productive specialisation and their geographical
|
||||
|
||||
location. This differentiated behaviour constitutes, at the same time,
|
||||
|
||||
an important contribution to social and territorial cohesion. In
|
||||
|
||||
particular, the contribution to social cohesion comprises the occupation
|
||||
|
||||
of groups with difficulties of access to employment, employment quality,
|
||||
|
||||
improvement in equal opportunities and the offer of social services.
|
||||
|
||||
The goal of this work is twofold. Firstly, to analyze the contribution
|
||||
|
||||
of Social Economy to social cohesion in terms of the employment of
|
||||
|
||||
people with disabilities and in particular the compliance with the quota
|
||||
|
||||
requirement. Secondly, to detect the enablers and barriers to work in
|
||||
|
||||
the design of labour policies for higher and better integration in
|
||||
|
||||
workplaces. This paper contributes to the literature by analyzing the
|
||||
|
||||
key aspects related to the perceptions, behaviour and culture of Social
|
||||
|
||||
Economy entities in relation to the integration of workers with
|
||||
|
||||
disabilities in their staffs, adding useful and relevant information for
|
||||
|
||||
the design and implementation of active labour policies.
|
||||
|
||||
In order to achieve these objectives, an ad-hoc survey has been designed
|
||||
|
||||
to analyze the compliance of quota legislation for people with
|
||||
|
||||
disabilities and conducted among Medium and Large Social Economy
|
||||
|
||||
entities (50 employees or more) in Spain. Quota legislation in Spain
|
||||
|
||||
establishes an obligation for companies with more than a certain number
|
||||
|
||||
of employees (50 or more) to employ a minimum percentage of people with
|
||||
|
||||
disabilities (2\%). The technical characteristics of the survey are as
|
||||
|
||||
follows:
|
||||
|
||||
i. The Universe of the survey is composed of all Social Economy entities
|
||||
|
||||
(except Special Employment Centres), located in Spain, from all economic
|
||||
|
||||
sectors with 50 or more employees. Universe size (according to the
|
||||
|
||||
National Statistics Institute of Spain and Social Economy statistics) is
|
||||
|
||||
composed by, approximately, 3.000 entities.
|
||||
|
||||
ii. Sampling used in this research is proportional, stratified by
|
||||
|
||||
economic sector, region and company size. Selection of interviewee units
|
||||
|
||||
is random. Sampling size is composed of 329 units, distributed to assure
|
||||
|
||||
representativeness by geographical region, sector and business size.
|
||||
|
||||
Sampling error is +/- 5\%. (Confidence level 95.5\% and probability
|
||||
|
||||
p=q=0.5 -2 sigma).
|
||||
|
||||
iii. Content of the survey refers to several topics such as:
|
||||
|
||||
identification data, business size, economic sector, employment size,
|
||||
|
||||
annual turnover; data about presence and job position of workers with
|
||||
|
||||
disabilities and information about integration process: how diversity,
|
||||
|
||||
especially related to people with disabilities, is incorporated into the
|
||||
|
||||
selection, hiring and promotion policies of the company.
|
||||
|
||||
Main results of the analyses show that the majority of Social Economy
|
||||
|
||||
entities are in compliance with the quota requirement (84.1\%). However,
|
||||
|
||||
there are some remarkable differences attending companies''
|
||||
|
||||
characteristics. Thus, the percentage of Social Economy entities
|
||||
|
||||
complying with the quota requirement is higher among large companies,
|
||||
|
||||
companies in social services and dependency sectors and, by geographical
|
||||
|
||||
area, among companies located in Andalusia or Catalonia. On the other
|
||||
|
||||
hand, medium-sized companies, industrial ones and Social Economy
|
||||
|
||||
entities located in Navarra or Basque Country show lower percentages of
|
||||
|
||||
compliance with the quota requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
This survey offers as well some qualitative information, divided into
|
||||
|
||||
two different sections. Firstly, the analysis is focused on some aspects
|
||||
|
||||
related to the perceptions, behaviour and culture of Social Economy
|
||||
|
||||
entities in relation to the integration of workers with disabilities in
|
||||
|
||||
their staffs. The aim of this section is to identify potential
|
||||
|
||||
differences between companies who are in compliance with the quota
|
||||
|
||||
requirement and those who do not. Some of the main results of this
|
||||
|
||||
section are:
|
||||
|
||||
i. Legal obligation and fiscal benefits are the main reason to hire
|
||||
|
||||
people with disabilities for both, companies that do and do not comply
|
||||
|
||||
with the quota requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
ii. Companies who comply with the quota requirement recruit personnel by
|
||||
|
||||
using employment agencies, acquaintances and relatives and online job
|
||||
|
||||
portals more frequently than those who do not comply with the quota
|
||||
|
||||
requirement.
|
||||
|
||||
iii. Companies or entities who integrate inclusion and diversity
|
||||
|
||||
(gender, cultural, racial, socio-economic, etc.) in their programmes,
|
||||
|
||||
policies and regulations are those with a higher percentage of people
|
||||
|
||||
with disabilities in their staff.
|
||||
|
||||
iv. Previous experiences related to the presence of workers with
|
||||
|
||||
disabilities seem to be the main and more important boost for Social
|
||||
|
||||
Economy entities and companies.
|
||||
|
||||
v. The appointment of a colleague as a support-buddy is the most
|
||||
|
||||
important intervention to facilitate the integration of the worker with
|
||||
|
||||
disability in the company
|
||||
|
||||
vi. The majority of Social Economy entities do not find any difficulty
|
||||
|
||||
related to the integration process. However, companies in compliance
|
||||
|
||||
with the quota find more obstacles than those who do not. Among those
|
||||
|
||||
who have faced any obstacle, main barriers are related to the adaptation
|
||||
|
||||
to the job; emotional barriers and physical space/accommodations
|
||||
|
||||
obstacles.
|
||||
|
||||
Secondly, the analysis focuses on the main reasons and obstacles found
|
||||
|
||||
by those companies and entities that do not have any employees with
|
||||
|
||||
disabilities in their staff, aiming to get to know their reasons to not
|
||||
|
||||
hire this collective. The main two reasons why these companies declare
|
||||
|
||||
that they do not have any person with disability in their staff are the
|
||||
|
||||
lack of candidates with disabilities and the lack of matching between
|
||||
|
||||
the candidates and job positions available.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus, results from this research highlight some key aspects that are
|
||||
|
||||
important to bear in mind. Firstly, values shared by Social Economy
|
||||
|
||||
entities do generate a differentiated behavior in relation to their
|
||||
|
||||
staff composition that contributes to the social cohesion. Secondly, the
|
||||
|
||||
implementation of instruments and active policies have a positive impact
|
||||
|
||||
over the integration of persons with disabilities in the ordinary labour
|
||||
|
||||
market; quota policies and fiscal incentives are named as the main
|
||||
|
||||
facilitators. In this sense, compliance with quota legislation is not a
|
||||
|
||||
dichotomous decision for Social Economy entities but a gradual and
|
||||
|
||||
continuous process that starts when hiring the first worker with
|
||||
|
||||
disability in their staffs. Thus, previous experiences related to the
|
||||
|
||||
presence of workers with disabilities seem to be the main boost for
|
||||
|
||||
Social Economy entities and companies. In third term, an inclusive
|
||||
|
||||
business culture that appreciates and accepts diversity (not only
|
||||
|
||||
related to disabilities) displays characteristics of general awareness
|
||||
|
||||
and inclusion of workers with disabilities in Social Economy entities.
|
||||
|
||||
The inclusion of specific measures related to disability in the
|
||||
|
||||
diversity policies is a challenge that firms, including Social Economy
|
||||
|
||||
ones, still has to confront.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, the study and dissemination of best practices among employers
|
||||
|
||||
is also important to surpass stereotypes and prejudices, contributing to
|
||||
|
||||
the integration of people with disabilities into the ordinary labour
|
||||
|
||||
market. As we have seen through this study, Social Economy companies and
|
||||
|
||||
entities that have hired people with disabilities would recommend it to
|
||||
|
||||
other ones. And this does not only have a positive effect in terms of
|
||||
|
||||
equity and ethical reasons, but it can also have a great impact on the
|
||||
|
||||
image connected to the Corporate Social Responsibility of the Social
|
||||
|
||||
Economy, also in terms of benefits related to more diverse workplaces.
|
||||
|
||||
Further research is needed in terms of the design of policies to foster
|
||||
|
||||
deeper integration of persons with disabilities into ordinary labour
|
||||
|
||||
market. As observed in the results, the matching process between
|
||||
|
||||
candidates and job positions shows some weaknesses and the existence of
|
||||
|
||||
workers with disabilities is one of the main facilitator to increase the
|
||||
|
||||
number of these workers in firms. Besides design and implementation of
|
||||
|
||||
active policies towards the integration of workers with disabilities,
|
||||
|
||||
especial attention must be given to the business culture regarding
|
||||
|
||||
disability. The study of enablers and obstacles in all kind of firms
|
||||
|
||||
might show different results from the ones obtained in this paper as it
|
||||
|
||||
would include small firms, which have no quota requirements, and
|
||||
|
||||
entities outside Social Economy, in which social cohesion might not be
|
||||
|
||||
among their principles.'
|
||||
affiliation: 'Sanchez, RS (Corresponding Author), Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Fac Ciencias
|
||||
Jurid \& Sociales, Madrid, Spain.
|
||||
|
||||
Santero Sanchez, Rosa; Castro Nunez, Belev, Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Fac Ciencias Jurid
|
||||
\& Sociales, Madrid, Spain.
|
||||
|
||||
Martinez Martin, Ma Isabel; Guillo Rodriguez, Nuria, Abay Analistas Econ, Madrid,
|
||||
Spain.'
|
||||
author: Santero Sanchez, Rosa and Castro Nunez, Belev and Martinez Martin, Ma Isabel
|
||||
and Guillo Rodriguez, Nuria
|
||||
author-email: 'rosa.santero@urjc.es
|
||||
|
||||
belen.castro@urjc.es
|
||||
|
||||
mmartinez@abayanalistas.net
|
||||
|
||||
nguillo@abayanalistas.net'
|
||||
author_list:
|
||||
- family: Santero Sanchez
|
||||
given: Rosa
|
||||
- family: Castro Nunez
|
||||
given: Belev
|
||||
- family: Martinez Martin
|
||||
given: Ma Isabel
|
||||
- family: Guillo Rodriguez
|
||||
given: Nuria
|
||||
da: '2023-09-28'
|
||||
eissn: 1989-6816
|
||||
files: []
|
||||
issn: 0213-8093
|
||||
journal: CIRIEC-ESPANA REVISTA DE ECONOMIA PUBLICA SOCIAL Y COOPERATIVA
|
||||
keywords: Employment; Social Economy; disability management; quotas
|
||||
keywords-plus: PEOPLE
|
||||
language: Spanish
|
||||
month: DEC
|
||||
number-of-cited-references: '27'
|
||||
orcid-numbers: 'Castro Nunez, Rosa Belen/0000-0002-9098-0748
|
||||
|
||||
Santero, Rosa/0000-0002-1071-4280'
|
||||
pages: 29-59
|
||||
papis_id: 3487d3c4fd3b03dddcbe45459907cad7
|
||||
ref: Santerosanchez2016socialeconomy
|
||||
researcherid-numbers: 'castro, rosa/ABE-7063-2022
|
||||
|
||||
'
|
||||
times-cited: '0'
|
||||
title: Social Economy and disability. Enablers and obstacles in the integration of
|
||||
workers with disabilities in the Social Economy entities
|
||||
type: Article
|
||||
unique-id: WOS:000399878000002
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013: '35'
|
||||
volume: '88'
|
||||
web-of-science-categories: Economics
|
||||
year: '2016'
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue