Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/171c2214df73e49c399a148daf5dacef-allard-jenna-and-ja/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+abstract: 'Background India''s abrupt nationwide Covid-19 lockdown internally
+
+  displaced millions of migrant workers, who returned to distant rural
+
+  homes. Documenting their labour market reintegration is a critical
+
+  aspect of understanding the economic costs of the pandemic for India''s
+
+  poor. In a country marked by low and declining female labour force
+
+  participation, identifying gender gaps in labour market reintegration -
+
+  as a marker of both women''s vulnerability at times of crisis and
+
+  setbacks in women''s agency - is especially important. Yet most studies
+
+  of pandemic -displaced internal migrants in India are small, rely on
+
+  highly selected convenience samples, and lack a gender focus. Methods
+
+  Beginning in April 2020 we enrolled roughly 4,600 displaced migrants who
+
+  had, during the lockdown, returned to two of India''s poorest states into
+
+  a cohort observational study which tracked enrolees through July 2021.
+
+  Survey respondents were randomly selected from the states'' official
+
+  databases of return migrants, with sampling stratified by state and
+
+  gender. 85\% of enrolees (3950) were working prior to the pandemic. Our
+
+  difference-in-means analysis uses three survey waves conducted in July
+
+  to August 2020, January to March 2021, and June to July 2021. Our
+
+  analysis focuses on a balanced panel of 1780 previously working enrolees
+
+  (the 45\% of respondents present in the first wave that also
+
+  participated in the subsequent two survey rounds). Primary outcomes of
+
+  interest include labour market re-entry, earnings, and measures of
+
+  vulnerability by gender. Findings Before the March 2020 national
+
+  lockdown, 98\% (95\% CI {[}97,99]) of workers were employed in the
+
+  non-agricultural sector. In July 2020, one month after the end of the
+
+  lockdown, incomes plummet, with both genders earning roughly 17\% of
+
+  their pre-pandemic incomes. 47\% (95\% CI {[}45,49]) were employed in
+
+  agriculture and 37\% (95\% CI {[}35,39]) were unemployed. Remigration is
+
+  critical to regaining income - by January 2021, male re-migrants report
+
+  earnings on par with their pre-pandemic incomes, while men remaining in
+
+  rural areas earn only 23\% (95\% CI {[}19,27]) of their pre-pandemic
+
+  income. Remigration benefits women to a lesser extent - female
+
+  re-migrants regain no more than 65\% (95\% CI {[}57,73]) of their
+
+  pre-pandemic income at any point. Yet men and women struggle to
+
+  remigrate throughout - by July 2021, no more than 63\% (95\% CI
+
+  {[}60,66]) of men and 55\% (95\% CI {[}51,59]) of women had left their
+
+  home villages since returning. Gender gaps in income recovery largely
+
+  reflect higher rates of unemployment among women, both among those
+
+  remaining in rural areas (9 percentage points (95\% CI {[}6,13]) higher
+
+  than men across waves) and among those who remigrate (13 percentage
+
+  points (95\% CI {[}9,17]) higher than men across waves). As a result, we
+
+  observe gender gaps in well-being: relative to male counterparts, women
+
+  across waves were 7 percentage points (95\% CI {[}4,10]) more likely to
+
+  report reduced consumption of essential goods and fared 6 percentage
+
+  points (95\% CI {[}4,7]) worse on a food insecurity index.
+
+  Interpretation Displaced migrants of both genders experienced persistent
+
+  hardships for over a year after the initial pandemic lockdown. Women
+
+  fare worse, driven by both lower rates of remigration and lower rates of
+
+  labour market re-entry both inside and outside home villages. Some women
+
+  drop out of the labour force entirely, but most unem-ployed report
+
+  seeking or being available to work. In short, pandemic-induced labour
+
+  market displacement has far-reaching, long-term consequences for migrant
+
+  workers, especially women.
+
+  Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.'
+affiliation: 'Allard, J (Corresponding Author), Yale Univ, MacMillan Ctr, Inclus Econ,
+  34 Hillhouse Ave, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
+
+  Allard, Jenna; Moore, Charity Troyer, Yale Univ, MacMillan Ctr, Inclus Econ, 34
+  Hillhouse Ave, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
+
+  Jagnani, Maulik, Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Econ, 1380 Lawrence St, Denver, CO 80204
+  USA.
+
+  Neggers, Yusuf, Univ Michigan, Gerald R Ford Sch Publ Policy, 735 S State St, Ann
+  Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
+
+  Pande, Rohini, Yale Univ, Dept Econ \& Econ Growth Ctr, 27 Hillhouse Ave, New Haven,
+  CT 06511 USA.
+
+  Schaner, Simone, Univ Southern Calif, Ctr Econ \& Social Res, 635 Downey Way, Los
+  Angeles, CA 90089 USA.'
+article-number: '101631'
+author: Allard, Jenna and Jagnani, Maulik and Neggers, Yusuf and Pande, Rohini and
+  Schaner, Simone and Moore, Charity Troyer
+author-email: jennifer.allard@yale.edu
+author_list:
+- family: Allard
+  given: Jenna
+- family: Jagnani
+  given: Maulik
+- family: Neggers
+  given: Yusuf
+- family: Pande
+  given: Rohini
+- family: Schaner
+  given: Simone
+- family: Moore
+  given: Charity Troyer
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101631
+earlyaccessdate: SEP 2022
+eissn: 2589-5370
+files: []
+journal: ECLINICALMEDICINE
+keywords: 'Domestic migrants; Covid-19 pandemic; panel; India; labour markets; food
+
+  insecurity'
+keywords-plus: MIGRATION; AGE; MARRIAGE; LOCKDOWN
+language: English
+month: NOV
+number-of-cited-references: '52'
+orcid-numbers: Schaner, Simone/0000-0001-5722-4265
+papis_id: 2eed8bf1c1336b0ae1b23d15fe26aec1
+ref: Allard2022indianfemale
+times-cited: '2'
+title: 'Indian female migrants face greater barriers to post-Covid recovery than males:
+  Evidence from a panel study'
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000860448700002
+usage-count-last-180-days: '3'
+usage-count-since-2013: '8'
+volume: '53'
+web-of-science-categories: Medicine, General \& Internal
+year: '2022'