Add wos sample results library
This commit is contained in:
parent
6305e61d1f
commit
19e409ad85
2173 changed files with 235628 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
|
|||
abstract: 'The article highlights the necessity of inclusive growth and development
|
||||
|
||||
concept implementation in times of economic and social instability as it
|
||||
|
||||
is widely recognized as the one that can and should tackle the common
|
||||
|
||||
long existing problems like poverty, inequality, and insecurity. Thus,
|
||||
|
||||
the subject of this research is to compare the patterns of inclusive
|
||||
|
||||
growth and development across economies of Central and Eastern Europe
|
||||
|
||||
(CEE); and to investigate the driving policies and institutions to
|
||||
|
||||
countries'' inclusive growth and development. The research objective is
|
||||
|
||||
to highlight policies that would increase equality, economic well-being,
|
||||
|
||||
and as a result, the competitiveness of CEE countries. Methods. For this
|
||||
|
||||
purpose, the comparative analysis of CEE countries'' inclusive growth and
|
||||
|
||||
development patterns was done; and the empirical evaluation was done to
|
||||
|
||||
observe relationship between the Inclusive Development Index and
|
||||
|
||||
indicators that described economic policies and institutional factors
|
||||
|
||||
relevant to inclusiveness. In a comparative analysis and a cross-country
|
||||
|
||||
regression model (for both dependent and independent variables), a
|
||||
|
||||
recently developed by World Economic Forum performance metric was used.
|
||||
|
||||
Results. The main findings suggest that the Czech and Slovak Republics
|
||||
|
||||
are the best performing among CEE countries in inclusive growth and
|
||||
|
||||
development patterns. On the contrary, Ukraine, Moldova, and Russian
|
||||
|
||||
Federation are the worst. Economic growth of these countries has not
|
||||
|
||||
transformed well into social inclusion. Still, there is a great
|
||||
|
||||
potential for all CEE economies to improve their social inclusiveness in
|
||||
|
||||
comparison with EU-28 and Norway (the most inclusive economy in 2018).
|
||||
|
||||
Results of the empirical research indicate that redistributive fiscal
|
||||
|
||||
policy has little influence on inclusive growth and development.
|
||||
|
||||
Nevertheless, it should create a public social protection system that is
|
||||
|
||||
engaged in decreasing poverty, vulnerability, and marginalization
|
||||
|
||||
without hampering economic growth. Besides, an effective and inclusive
|
||||
|
||||
redistributive state system of CEE economies should accentuate on
|
||||
|
||||
supporting human economic opportunities. According to the results of the
|
||||
|
||||
regression model, positive strong influence on inclusive growth and
|
||||
|
||||
development is associated with the employment and labour compensation
|
||||
|
||||
policy that allows people to directly increase their incomes and feel
|
||||
|
||||
active and productive members of society; the basic services and
|
||||
|
||||
infrastructure policy which is a necessary ground for present and future
|
||||
|
||||
human and economic development; the asset building and entrepreneurship
|
||||
|
||||
policy provides diminishing inequality and rising economic opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
by fostering medium and small business creation and enlarging
|
||||
|
||||
possibilities of home and other asset ownership. Altogether these
|
||||
|
||||
policies would increase broad-based human economic opportunities and
|
||||
|
||||
consequently both equality, economic well-being, and CEE economies''
|
||||
|
||||
competitiveness in the long run. The counter-intuitive effect observed
|
||||
|
||||
in the regression model between education and skills development policy
|
||||
|
||||
and country''s inclusive growth and development needs further
|
||||
|
||||
investigations, as education is important for social mobility and
|
||||
|
||||
decrease in income and wealth inequality.'
|
||||
affiliation: 'Tsapko-Piddubna, O (Corresponding Author), Ivan Franko Natl Univ Lviv,
|
||||
Lvov, Ukraine.
|
||||
|
||||
Tsapko-Piddubna, Olga, Ivan Franko Natl Univ Lviv, Lvov, Ukraine.'
|
||||
author: Tsapko-Piddubna, Olga
|
||||
author-email: olha.tsapko-piddubna@lnu.edu.ua
|
||||
author_list:
|
||||
- family: Tsapko-Piddubna
|
||||
given: Olga
|
||||
da: '2023-09-28'
|
||||
doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-2-233-239
|
||||
eissn: 2256-0963
|
||||
files: []
|
||||
issn: 2256-0742
|
||||
journal: BALTIC JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES
|
||||
keywords: inclusive growth and development; inequality; economic opportunity
|
||||
language: English
|
||||
number: '2'
|
||||
number-of-cited-references: '11'
|
||||
orcid-numbers: Tsapko-Piddubna, Olga/0000-0002-7233-6019
|
||||
pages: 233-239
|
||||
papis_id: 1a77e1b47eb1c459898403613ab124a6
|
||||
ref: Tsapkopiddubna2021inclusivegrowth
|
||||
researcherid-numbers: Tsapko-Piddubna, Olga/ABA-3199-2021
|
||||
times-cited: '2'
|
||||
title: 'INCLUSIVE GROWTH POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT: THE CASE OF CENTRAL
|
||||
AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES'
|
||||
type: Article
|
||||
unique-id: WOS:000656755200025
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013: '14'
|
||||
volume: '7'
|
||||
web-of-science-categories: Economics
|
||||
year: '2021'
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue