2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
abstract: 'Bringing sociological theory and research to bear on the ``quota
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debates{''''} dogging discussion of federal civil rights legislation in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the early 1990s, this article highlights sociology''s role in shaping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employment law and shows how apparently technical legal arguments about
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
allocating burdens of proof affect labor market resource allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
among the classes, races, and genders. Contrasting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
institutional-sociological with liberal-legal concepts of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discrimination, the article shows why disparate impact theory has been
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the most sociological approach to Title VII enforcement. It also shows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
how disparate impact-a theory and method for establishing legally
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cognizable employment discrimination injurious to women and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minorities-is, and is not, related to affirmative action-a policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
encompassing a broad range of procedures intended to provide positive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consideration to members of groups discriminated against in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, a competing incentive framework is used to show that, although
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
disparate impact creates some incentives for employers to adopt quota
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hiring, such incentives are counter-balanced by major incentives working
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
against race- and gender-based quotas. Major counterincentives stem from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
disparate impact itself, from other aspects of equal employment law, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from organizational goals shaping business response to the legal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
environment.'
|
|
|
|
affiliation: 'Stryker, R (Corresponding Author), Univ Minnesota, Dept Sociol, 909
|
|
|
|
Social Sci Bldg,267 19th Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Univ Minnesota, Dept Sociol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.'
|
|
|
|
author: Stryker, R
|
|
|
|
author_list:
|
|
|
|
- family: Stryker
|
|
|
|
given: R
|
|
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
|
|
|
doi: 10.1525/tsq.2001.42.1.13
|
|
|
|
files: []
|
|
|
|
issn: 0038-0253
|
|
|
|
journal: SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY
|
|
|
|
keywords-plus: 'AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION; CIVIL-RIGHTS; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; TITLE-VII;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCRIMINATION; ANTIDISCRIMINATION; WORKPLACE; TRANSFORMATION;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEGREGATION; OPPORTUNITY'
|
|
|
|
language: English
|
|
|
|
month: WIN
|
|
|
|
note: 'Annual Meeting of the American-Sociological-Association, NEW YORK, NEW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YORK, AUG 16-20, 1996'
|
|
|
|
number: '1'
|
|
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '111'
|
|
|
|
pages: 13-46
|
|
|
|
papis_id: 923fea72dbc8f338792f3bf9757b14dd
|
|
|
|
ref: Stryker2001disparateimpact
|
|
|
|
times-cited: '28'
|
|
|
|
title: 'Disparate impact and the quota debates: Law, labor market sociology, and equal
|
|
|
|
employment policies'
|
2023-10-01 08:15:07 +00:00
|
|
|
type: article
|
2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000167192600002
|
|
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '1'
|
|
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '20'
|
|
|
|
volume: '42'
|
|
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Sociology
|
|
|
|
year: '2001'
|