wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/470e573fc477281251de27a0c031af93-stryker-r/info.yaml

80 lines
2.5 KiB
YAML
Raw Normal View History

2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
abstract: 'Bringing sociological theory and research to bear on the ``quota
debates{''''} dogging discussion of federal civil rights legislation in
the early 1990s, this article highlights sociology''s role in shaping
employment law and shows how apparently technical legal arguments about
allocating burdens of proof affect labor market resource allocation
among the classes, races, and genders. Contrasting
institutional-sociological with liberal-legal concepts of
discrimination, the article shows why disparate impact theory has been
the most sociological approach to Title VII enforcement. It also shows
how disparate impact-a theory and method for establishing legally
cognizable employment discrimination injurious to women and
minorities-is, and is not, related to affirmative action-a policy
encompassing a broad range of procedures intended to provide positive
consideration to members of groups discriminated against in the past.
Finally, a competing incentive framework is used to show that, although
disparate impact creates some incentives for employers to adopt quota
hiring, such incentives are counter-balanced by major incentives working
against race- and gender-based quotas. Major counterincentives stem from
disparate impact itself, from other aspects of equal employment law, and
from organizational goals shaping business response to the legal
environment.'
affiliation: 'Stryker, R (Corresponding Author), Univ Minnesota, Dept Sociol, 909
Social Sci Bldg,267 19th Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
Univ Minnesota, Dept Sociol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.'
author: Stryker, R
author_list:
- family: Stryker
given: R
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1525/tsq.2001.42.1.13
files: []
issn: 0038-0253
journal: SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY
keywords-plus: 'AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION; CIVIL-RIGHTS; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; TITLE-VII;
DISCRIMINATION; ANTIDISCRIMINATION; WORKPLACE; TRANSFORMATION;
SEGREGATION; OPPORTUNITY'
language: English
month: WIN
note: 'Annual Meeting of the American-Sociological-Association, NEW YORK, NEW
YORK, AUG 16-20, 1996'
number: '1'
number-of-cited-references: '111'
pages: 13-46
papis_id: 923fea72dbc8f338792f3bf9757b14dd
ref: Stryker2001disparateimpact
times-cited: '28'
title: 'Disparate impact and the quota debates: Law, labor market sociology, and equal
employment policies'
type: Article; Proceedings Paper
unique-id: WOS:000167192600002
usage-count-last-180-days: '1'
usage-count-since-2013: '20'
volume: '42'
web-of-science-categories: Sociology
year: '2001'