220 lines
7.6 KiB
YAML
220 lines
7.6 KiB
YAML
abstract: 'BackgroundAlmost nowhere in the world do women participate as much as
|
|
|
|
men in the labor force. Despite differences in countries'' economic,
|
|
|
|
social and cultural contexts, gender norms-unwritten rules of acceptable
|
|
|
|
actions for men and women-have been found to affect women''s labor
|
|
|
|
participation across contexts. Gender norms include those regulating who
|
|
|
|
takes care of children, who is expected to earn more, and in which
|
|
|
|
sectors men and women should work. Importantly, norms affect access to
|
|
|
|
labor markets at times of scarcity: when there''s only work for one,
|
|
|
|
gender norms can dictate whether a woman or man gets the job. Advocates
|
|
|
|
of equal labor force participation point to evidence that employment can
|
|
|
|
contribute to people''s health and well-being; yet the evidence is mixed
|
|
|
|
and contradictory, and mostly comes from high-income countries. In
|
|
|
|
restrictive normative contexts in which women are assigned the role of
|
|
|
|
family caretaker, full time employment (FTE) might be particularly
|
|
|
|
burdensome. At the same time, the literature lacks a cross-country
|
|
|
|
analysis of how gender norms affect women''s FTE and their health when
|
|
|
|
employed full time, despite qualitative research providing clear
|
|
|
|
evidence of the influence of gender norms on labor participation. AimsIn
|
|
|
|
this paper we examine: (1) how gender norms affect women''s access to FTE
|
|
|
|
across 97 countries; (2) associations between FTE and women''s
|
|
|
|
self-reported health self-rated (SRH) across different normative
|
|
|
|
contexts (i.e., countries where it is common vs. uncommon for women to
|
|
|
|
stay home); and (3) how women''s FTE and gender norms changed over time
|
|
|
|
in four countries. DataWe used time-series data from the World Values
|
|
|
|
Survey and European Values Survey conducted in over 100 countries
|
|
|
|
between 1981 and 2014. Both surveys attempt to capture norms, beliefs
|
|
|
|
and values in addition to sociodemographic information among a
|
|
|
|
nationally representative adult population in each country. The sample
|
|
|
|
for the cross-sectional analyses (aims 1 and 2) included 97 countries
|
|
|
|
and 131,132 respondents. The sample for aim 3 included data from
|
|
|
|
Argentina, Egypt, Finland and Japan. VariablesOur outcome of interest
|
|
|
|
was pro-equality norms in the context of access to the labor market for
|
|
|
|
women. Respondents were asked ``if jobs are scarce, men should have more
|
|
|
|
right to a job than women do?{''''}. Response options included no, neither
|
|
|
|
or yes. We created a binary variable to represent pro-equality norms. We
|
|
|
|
included employment status and SRH as exposures of interest. AnalysisWe
|
|
|
|
used individual-level data to generate on-average and sex-stratified
|
|
|
|
estimates of the outcome and exposures for each country, at each time
|
|
|
|
point. We estimated the percentage of all respondents, of women, and of
|
|
|
|
men who held pro-equality norms (believe that men should not have more
|
|
|
|
right to a job than women), the percentage who were employed full time,
|
|
|
|
and the average level of SRH. To measure gender inequality in FTE, we
|
|
|
|
also estimated the absolute difference in FTE between women and men for
|
|
|
|
each country at each time point. First, we conducted descriptive,
|
|
|
|
cross-sectional ecological analyses using one survey per country from
|
|
|
|
wave 5 or 6 (whichever was most recent) to examine associations between
|
|
|
|
pro-equality norms and employment status as a proxy for associations
|
|
|
|
between norms and the context of employment in each country. We also
|
|
|
|
examined associations between pro-equality norms and SRH.
|
|
|
|
We then specified adjusted logistic regression models with controls for
|
|
|
|
age, sex and education to examine associations between pro-equality
|
|
|
|
norms and employment status. To examine if the relationship between FTE
|
|
|
|
and SRH varied by normative context, we grouped countries in quartiles
|
|
|
|
of pro-equality norms. Finally, we conducted descriptive ecological
|
|
|
|
analyses of the relationship between pro-equality norms and employment
|
|
|
|
status over time in four countries. ResultsObjective 1: Gender norms
|
|
|
|
intersect with socio-cultural contexts in determining women''s FTE. While
|
|
|
|
in some countries gender norms aligned positively with women''s access to
|
|
|
|
employment (i.e., more equal norms matched more equality in FTE), in
|
|
|
|
Eastern Europe and South America we observed a mismatch. In Eastern
|
|
|
|
Europe we found strong norms against equal access but small sex
|
|
|
|
differences in FTE. In South America, we observed a stark difference in
|
|
|
|
FTE favoring men, despite positive gender norms promoting women''s paid
|
|
|
|
employment. Objective 2: We found the association between SRH and FTE to
|
|
|
|
vary across normative contexts. For instance, while in Scandinavian
|
|
|
|
countries it was protective to be a woman in FTE and harmful not to work
|
|
|
|
full-time, we found the opposite effect in Middle Eastern countries.
|
|
|
|
Objective 3: We found a general tendency to move toward greater equality
|
|
|
|
in norms and FTE over time everywhere in the world. However, political
|
|
|
|
and economic events can generate variations over time and setbacks in
|
|
|
|
progress toward equality.We specifically looked at 4 countries:
|
|
|
|
Argentina, Egypt, Finland and Japan and assessed the effects of
|
|
|
|
economic, political and national legislative changes on FTE over time.
|
|
|
|
ImplicationsThis paper contributes to the conversation on tensions
|
|
|
|
between universal justice and contextual factors affecting one''s health.
|
|
|
|
To achieve purposeful and global universal health and justice, policy
|
|
|
|
makers and global health practitioners must design effective,
|
|
|
|
context-relevant interventions that are deeply and transparently
|
|
|
|
informed by the values they embody. As we strive to achieve global
|
|
|
|
gender equality, its meanings and purposes will vary across contexts in
|
|
|
|
ways that demand people-led conversations and interventions.'
|
|
affiliation: 'Cislaghi, B (Corresponding Author), London Sch Hyg \& Trop Med, Dept
|
|
Global Hlth \& Dev, London, England.
|
|
|
|
Cislaghi, Beniamino; Bhatia, Amiya; Horanieh, Nour, London Sch Hyg \& Trop Med,
|
|
Dept Global Hlth \& Dev, London, England.
|
|
|
|
Hallgren, Emma Sofia Thonander, Stanford Univ, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Palo
|
|
Alto, CA USA.
|
|
|
|
Weber, Ann M., Univ Nevada, Sch Community Hlth Sci, Reno, NV USA.
|
|
|
|
Darmstadt, Gary L., Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA.'
|
|
article-number: '689815'
|
|
author: Cislaghi, Beniamino and Bhatia, Amiya and Hallgren, Emma Sofia Thonander and
|
|
Horanieh, Nour and Weber, Ann M. and Darmstadt, Gary L.
|
|
author-email: ben.cislaghi@lshtm.ac.uk
|
|
author_list:
|
|
- family: Cislaghi
|
|
given: Beniamino
|
|
- family: Bhatia
|
|
given: Amiya
|
|
- family: Hallgren
|
|
given: Emma Sofia Thonander
|
|
- family: Horanieh
|
|
given: Nour
|
|
- family: Weber
|
|
given: Ann M.
|
|
- family: Darmstadt
|
|
given: Gary L.
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
|
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.689815
|
|
files: []
|
|
issn: 1664-1078
|
|
journal: FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
|
|
keywords: 'gender equality; gender norms; women empowerment; full-time employment;
|
|
|
|
self-reported health (SRH)'
|
|
keywords-plus: 'WOMEN; UNEMPLOYMENT; FAMILY; PAY; DISCRIMINATION; INEQUALITY;
|
|
|
|
PERCEPTION; EDUCATION; MANAGERS; FEMINISM'
|
|
language: English
|
|
month: MAY 31
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '85'
|
|
orcid-numbers: Darmstadt, Gary/0000-0002-7522-5824
|
|
papis_id: 4e3ead09a850c09d7a6f1e44bb03c8b3
|
|
ref: Cislaghi2022gendernorms
|
|
researcherid-numbers: 'Darmstadt, Gary/AAU-7488-2020
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
times-cited: '3'
|
|
title: 'Gender Norms and Gender Equality in Full-Time Employment and Health: A 97-Country
|
|
Analysis of the World Values Survey'
|
|
type: article
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000816371100001
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '7'
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '18'
|
|
volume: '13'
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Psychology, Multidisciplinary
|
|
year: '2022'
|