professional/wow-inequalities

Fork 0

Marty Oehme 826b4d5b87

feat(notes): Add scoping steps to screening tool

2024-01-06 15:29:06 +01:00

6.3 KiB

Raw Blame History

Scoping tool

after identification a large pool of potential studies will be in the zotero index (usually > 1000)
to make scoping (somewhat) rapid, we employ multi-step exclusions
- rapid scoping reviews sometimes only make use of single steps, e.g. only title-screening, as inclusion criteria
title screening
- exclude all studies that do not match with out::title
- move all studies that do match into next step with TODO::abstract
abstract screening
- exclude all studies that do not match with out::abstract
- move all studies that do match into next step with TODO::full-text
- studies which seem reasonably sure to be of vale can be tagged with relevant to be easier to spot later on
fulltext screening
- exclude all studies that do not match with out::full-text
- move all studies that do match into next step with TODO::extract
for any of the above steps:
- if the study is a potentially relevant review, mark with TODO::review for later snowballing
- if you are unsure and require outside input mark with TODO::QUESTION
extraction
- mark successful extraction with done::extracted
- often done as full-text screening and extraction in single step
- add any relevant tags, but at least type::, inequality::, country:: and possibly region:: tags

Category reference

Tracks the categories and possible values of tags (or 'keywords') for the screening process step of scoping.

TODO

A work-in-progress tag which simply states the step of the scoping review process the respective source is currently at.

TODO::QUESTION
TODO::SPANISH
TODO::abstract
TODO::full-text
TODO::review
TODO::title
done::extracted
done::preliminary

Cite

Even if a study is not directly relevant for the final extraction pool, it might contain valuable information. These tags give the reason they may prove interesting yet when considering the inequalities analyzed by them.

cite::channels
cite::framework
cite::further_reading

Country

The main country of interest for the study. Multiple possible for comparative/multiple case studies. Global studies, or ones using dozens of countries will not be tagged.

country::Argentina
country::Armenia
country::Australia
country::Austria
country::Bangladesh
country::Belgium
country::Bengal
country::Bolivia
country::Bosnia_Herzegovina
country::Botswana
country::Brazil
country::Britain
country::Burundi
country::Cambodia
country::Cameroon
country::Canada
country::Chile
country::China
country::Colombia
country::Croatia
country::Cyprus
country::Czech_Republic
country::Denmark
country::Ecuador
country::Eswatini
country::Ethiopia
country::Finland
country::France
country::Germany
country::Ghana
country::Greece
country::Guatemala
country::Honduras
country::HongKong
country::Hungary
country::India
country::Indonesia
country::Iran
country::Ireland
country::Israel
country::Italy
country::Japan
country::Jordan
country::Kazakhstan
country::Kenya
country::Korea
country::Liberia
country::Lithuania
country::Madagascar
country::Malawi
country::Malawy
country::Malaysia
country::Malta
country::Mexico
country::Mongolia
country::Morocco
country::Nepal
country::Netherlands
country::New_Zealand
country::Nicaragua
country::Nigeria
country::Norway
country::Pakistan
country::Paraguay
country::Philippines
country::Poland
country::Portugal
country::Romania
country::Russia
country::Rwanda
country::Saudi_Arabia
country::Senegal
country::Slovakia
country::South_Africa
country::Spain
country::Sri_Lanka
country::Sweden
country::Switzerland
country::Taiwan
country::Tanzania
country::Thailand
country::Timor-Leste
country::Turkey
country::US
country::Ukraine
country::Uruguay
country::Vietnam
country::West_Bank
country::Zambia

Inequality

The type of inequality illuminated by a study. Will often be multiple, a strong sign for a study's intersectional approach.

inequality::age
inequality::consumption
inequality::disability
inequality::education
inequality::ethnicity
inequality::gender
inequality::generational
inequality::health
inequality::income
inequality::language
inequality::lgbt
inequality::migration
inequality::poverty
inequality::racial
inequality::socio-demographic
inequality::spatial

Issue

If there is an issue with a study which may impede further progress, or any progress at all - even if it may not be sorted out from relevance yet, or if it has.

issue::age
issue::language
issue::no-access

Method

If one method is clearly marked as primary, or surprisingly is not the primary method within title and or abstract, it will be noted here.

method::qualitative
method::quantitative

Out

The reason, or step of the screening process for the study falling out of relevance. Will be used later to generate accurate numbers per screening step.

out::abstract
out::full-text
out::language
out::review
out::title
out::year

Region

The general world region a study is working in. May align to the individual country (or countries) it is analyzing, but may also stand on its own.

region::global
region::AP
region::EU
region::LAC
region::MENA
region::NA
region::SSA

Review

If a study is a review, it will be captured under one of these tags.

review::?
review::critical
review::integrative
review::meta
review::narrative
review::scoping
review::systematic
review::umbrella

Type

The primary type of intervention, circumstance or shock the study is interested in.

type::automation
type::cash_transfer
type::child_labor
type::collective_action
type::cooperative_entrepreneurship
type::counseling
type::csr
type::electrification
type::experimental
type::infrastructure
type::institutional
type::marketization
type::maternity_benefit
type::microcredit
type::minimum_wage
type::pension
type::regulation
type::rtw
type::structural
type::subsidy
type::taxation
type::trade_liberalization
type::training
type::ubi
type::universal_licensing
type::volunteering
type::welfare
type::work_programme

Misc

⚠️ Invalid DOI
⛔ No DOI found
favorite
relevant
integrated
intersectional
definition

6.3 KiB Raw Blame History