wow-inequalities/documentation/meeting_2023-12-12.md

2 KiB

Meeting ILO

Progress

  • search protocol and methodology has been finished first

  • the identification process was finished middle of November

    • the raw study pool from querying was created and all potential studies identified
  • screening was finished 2 weeks ago

  • now I'm extracting, we are at roughly

    • 30 relevant studies done and by current estimates ~> 60 relevant ones are in the pool
    • so that is what could be done end of the year, with findings extracted
  • but this is missing the second snowballing pass, getting relevant sources from

    • to get links of different areas

Deadlines

  • december will be doable for a structural outline and preliminary findings
  • the complete pass will

Outline feedback

  • a lot of feedback on the outline

  • issues with

  • technical/theoretical/operational work

    • but also highly political
    • we need to respect the political process
  • workers and employers side will be the

  • final output will be pre-approved

    • send individual output eoy
      • it need to be a 'visibly' final output
      • it does not need to be final but complete
    • we will send invoices for our work beginning of year
    • we will still be paid with 2023 funds
    • work will continue afterwards
  • plan

    • sending revised outline
    • getting feedback
    • have presentation
    • sending final collated/collected output
  • this is planned as a 'phase1' project

    • we are laying foundations for additional statistical work used by ILO
    • we can bring our own own ideas
  • new outline

    • presentation of work
    • informal workplan
    • plans for phase2
  • from my side to at least minimize the issue of 'getting lost in translation' for findings or approaches

    • I made sure to work out the rigorous / academic methodology of the review process
    • the important/priority part now is to translate that into the findings

  • "human driven exercises so there is always the possibility for errors"
  • rosalia and colleagues the reach colleagues?