professional/wow-inequalities
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

feat(script): Add note to institutional findings table

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2024-02-15 16:36:05 +01:00
parent d4aa40b277
commit f8abe295e0
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
1 changed files with 7 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

9
scoping_review.qmd
View file

@ -628,10 +628,9 @@ g = sns.PairGrid(validities[["internal_validity", "external_validity", "identifi
{{< portrait >}}
::: {#tbl-findings-institutional}
```{python}
#| label: tbl-findings-institutional
#| tbl-cap: Main findings summary institutional policies
from src.model import strength_of_findings as findings
findings_institutional = pd.read_csv("02-data/supplementary/findings-institutional.csv")
@ -640,6 +639,12 @@ fd_df = findings.add_validities(findings_institutional, by_intervention)
md(tabulate(fd_df[["area of policy", "internal_validity", "external_validity", "findings", "channels"]].fillna(""), showindex=False, headers="keys", tablefmt="grid"))
```
Note: Each main finding is presented with an internal strength of evidence and an external strength of evidence which describe the combined validities of the evidence base for the respective finding. Validities are binned to a weak (-) evidence base up to a validity rank of 2.9, evidential (+) between 3.0 and 5.9 and strong evidence base (++) above 6.0.
Summary of main findings for institutional policies
:::
{{< landscape >}}
### Labour laws and regulatory systems