diff --git a/scoping_review.qmd b/scoping_review.qmd
index 3fb64d7..f109baf 100644
--- a/scoping_review.qmd
+++ b/scoping_review.qmd
@@ -628,10 +628,9 @@ g = sns.PairGrid(validities[["internal_validity", "external_validity", "identifi
 
 {{< portrait >}}
 
+::: {#tbl-findings-institutional}
 
 ```{python}
-#| label: tbl-findings-institutional
-#| tbl-cap: Main findings summary institutional policies
 from src.model import strength_of_findings as findings
 
 findings_institutional = pd.read_csv("02-data/supplementary/findings-institutional.csv")
@@ -640,6 +639,12 @@ fd_df = findings.add_validities(findings_institutional, by_intervention)
 md(tabulate(fd_df[["area of policy",  "internal_validity", "external_validity", "findings", "channels"]].fillna(""), showindex=False, headers="keys", tablefmt="grid"))
 ```
 
+Note: Each main finding is presented with an internal strength of evidence and an external strength of evidence which describe the combined validities of the evidence base for the respective finding. Validities are binned to a weak (-) evidence base up to a validity rank of 2.9, evidential (+) between 3.0 and 5.9 and strong evidence base (++) above 6.0.
+
+Summary of main findings for institutional policies
+
+:::
+
 {{< landscape >}}
 
 ### Labour laws and regulatory systems