feat(script): Add disability discussion frameworks
Added Gruber2014 system level theory and Kim2020 organisational environmental factors.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9ecf224a7
commit
e83f67e3c0
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -1300,12 +1300,21 @@ Structurally approached interventions are also pursued, looking at the overall e
|
||||||
the individual effects of activation play a role [@Carstens2018].
|
the individual effects of activation play a role [@Carstens2018].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<!-- frameworks/qualitative discussion -->
|
<!-- frameworks/qualitative discussion -->
|
||||||
|
One framework which approaches the discussion from a more institutional-structural view is provided by the systems level theoretical grounding of @Gruber2014,
|
||||||
|
separating into the exclusionary effects of disability into institutional factors at the macro level, at the meso level and factors influencing the micro level,
|
||||||
|
and directly focusing on the separation or inclusion of education, recognition of eligibility for vocational rehabilitation and self-recognition as pre-condition for effective programme undertaking respectively.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The findings for a need toward agency-based interventions reflect in frameworks which put the organizational barriers into focus and simultaneously demand a more inclusive look into (re)integration of people with disabilities into the labour market and within the world of work [@Martin2020].
|
The findings for a need toward agency-based interventions reflect in frameworks which put the organizational barriers into focus and simultaneously demand a more inclusive look into (re)integration of people with disabilities into the labour market and within the world of work [@Martin2020].
|
||||||
|
@Kim2020 find the environmental factors in workplaces can significantly affect the individual job retention wishes of disabled employees, through the provided disability facilities influencing both work satisfaction and perceived workplace safety.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here, in addition to the predominantly used measures of employment and return to work rates,
|
Here, in addition to the predominantly used measures of employment and return to work rates,
|
||||||
meaningful achievement and decent work should be measured from individual economic and social-psychological indicators, especially in view of the already predominantly agency-based variety of interventions.
|
meaningful achievement and decent work should be measured from individual economic and social-psychological indicators, especially in view of the already predominantly agency-based variety of interventions.
|
||||||
There is a clear bias in studies on disability interventions towards studies undertaken in developed countries and, more specifically,
|
There is a clear bias in studies on disability interventions towards studies undertaken in developed countries and, more specifically,
|
||||||
based on the Veteran Disability system in the United States which has been the object of analysis for a variety of studies but equally highlights gaps in research on the topic in other contexts and other regions.
|
based on the Veteran Disability system in the United States which has been the object of analysis for a variety of studies but equally highlights gaps in research on the topic in other contexts and other regions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A recurring focus in all these discussions is their insistence on the intersectional nature of the issue, with gender, ethnicity, location, type and level of disability among others often creating more adverse conditions for disabled individuals.
|
||||||
|
This constitutes a second gap which should provide stronger focus in empirical works, in attempts to disaggregate analyses beyond disability and control group to further understand factors of inequality at work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Migration & ethnic inequalities
|
## Migration & ethnic inequalities
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The effects of policy interventions targeting migratory and ethnic inequalities in the world of work are viewed primarily through the regions of North America, Europe, and Central, South and East Asia, and the Pacific,
|
The effects of policy interventions targeting migratory and ethnic inequalities in the world of work are viewed primarily through the regions of North America, Europe, and Central, South and East Asia, and the Pacific,
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue