!fix(data): Fix measures collected
Fixed the measures and directions collected to use Gini, Atkinson, .. measures or absolute employment, poverty, etc.
This commit is contained in:
parent
50409bb9d3
commit
6e4f19ac3f
GPG key ID:
EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
24 changed files with 109 additions and 73 deletions
|
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
|
|||
usage-count-last-180-days = {0},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {12},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Economics},
|
||||
keywords = {done::extracted,inequality::income,relevant,type::regulation},
|
||||
keywords = {direction::vertical,done::extracted,inequality::income,relevant,type::regulation},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/QR2I7K2X/Adams_Atsu_2015_Assessing the distributional effects of regulation in developing countries.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,11 +29,11 @@ observation:
|
|||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: spatial; income
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income; consumption
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: real consumption wage differences
|
||||
findings: results depend on financing scheme, each financing scheme entails some households being worse off; rural households worse off when infrastructure is deficit-financed or paid through tariff revenue; rural households benefit most when financed through consumption taxes or by external aid
|
||||
channels: movement of rural workers out of quasi-subsistence agriculture to other locations and sectors
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
direction: -1
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes: there can be spatial differences to how connected regions within a country are to markets purely due to transport costs
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,30 +23,42 @@ causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
|||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: macro-level observations subsumed under region-level scale only
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: regulation
|
||||
- intervention: trade liberalization (FDI)
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
structural: 0
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
findings: labour regulations and business regulations negatively related to income distribution while credit market regulation has no effect in income distribution; FDI unlikely to generate equity-oriented welfare effects; trade openness not significantly related
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: FDI unlikely to generate equity-oriented welfare effects; trade openness not significantly related
|
||||
channels: wrong targeting incentive structure for FDI
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
- intervention: regulation (labour)
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
structural: 0
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: labour regulations and business regulations negatively related to equitable income distribution while credit market regulation has no effect in income distribution; FDI unlikely to generate equity-oriented welfare effects; trade openness not significantly related
|
||||
channels: regulatory policies often lack institutional capability to optimize for benefits; policies require specific targeting of inequality reduction
|
||||
direction: 0 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
- intervention: school enrolment
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
- intervention: education (school enrolment)
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
structural: 0
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
findings: school enrolment positively related to income distribution
|
||||
channels:
|
||||
direction: 0 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: school enrolment positively related to equitable income distribution
|
||||
channels: capacity-building for public administration practitioners; more context-adapted policies generated
|
||||
direction: -1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes: LM regulations defined as hiring/firing, minimum wage, severance pay; business reg. bureaucracy costs, business starting costs, licensing and compliance costs; credit market oversight of banks, private sector credit, interest rate controls
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ observation:
|
|||
structural: 0
|
||||
agency: 1
|
||||
inequality: gender; income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: savings; decision-making
|
||||
findings: increase in household decision-making; increase in economic security; constrained by inability for individuals to obtain loans
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: empowerment index (personal savings; personal income; asset ownership)
|
||||
findings: increase in household decision-making for women; increase in economic security for women; constrained by inability for individuals to obtain loans
|
||||
channels: individual access to finance; collective agency increase through meetings and training
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 1 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income; poverty
|
||||
findings: small impact on inequality of income signals bad programme targeting; significant reduction in poverty measures for sole parents in employment but insignificant for sole parents overall
|
||||
measures: Atkinson index
|
||||
findings: small impact on inequality of income signals bad programme targeting; significant reduction in poverty measures for sole parents already in employment only, but insignificant for sole parents overall
|
||||
channels: many low-wage earners are secondary earners in higher income households; low-wage households often have no wage earners at all
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
direction: -1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 0 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ representativeness: national
|
|||
causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: low levels of explanatory power for individual model outcomes, esp for disadvantaged population groups; possible endogeneity bias through unobserved factors (e.g. human capital)
|
||||
limitations: low levels of explanatory power for individual model outcomes, esp for disadvantaged population groups; possible endogeneity bias through unobserved factors (e.g. human capital); binary distinction automobile access, not graduated
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: subsidy (housing mobility)
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,11 +30,23 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: spatial; gender
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment
|
||||
findings: no relationship between subsidy and employment outcomes; increased employment probability for car ownership; increased employment probability for high transit areas, not increased job gain for moving to high transit area
|
||||
measures: employment rate
|
||||
findings: no relationship between subsidy and employment outcomes; increased employment probability for people living in high transit areas, but no increased job gain for moving to high transit area itself
|
||||
channels: high transit area employment paradox may be due to inherent difficulty of connecting household to opportunity in dispersed labor market just via access to transit
|
||||
direction: 0 # 0 = no relationship no direction
|
||||
significance: 0 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
- intervention: transport infrastructure (car ownership)
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: spatial; gender
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment rate
|
||||
findings: increased employment probability for car ownership
|
||||
channels: better transport mobility to access wider job opportunity network
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 = no relationship no direction
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes: 98% of sample is female
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: gender; income
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: rtw
|
||||
measures: employment (rtw)
|
||||
findings: short-term (<6months) decrease of rtw; long-term (>6-9months) significant positive impact on returning to work in same job under same conditions; greatest response from disadvantaged mothers
|
||||
channels: supplants previous employer-funded leave which often did not exist for disadvantaged mothers; reduction in opportunity cost of delaying rtw
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ group: formal workers
|
|||
data: WB Doing Business Survey, WDI, ILOSTAT
|
||||
|
||||
design: quasi-experimental
|
||||
method: dual economy general-equilibrium model; Gini coefficient
|
||||
method: dual economy general-equilibrium model
|
||||
sample: 43
|
||||
unit: country
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
|
|
@ -29,11 +29,11 @@ observation:
|
|||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: short-term reduction of skilled-unskilled wage gap but increased unemployment, decreased welfare; long-term increased wage equality and improved social welfare
|
||||
channels: firm exit from urban manufacturing increases capital to rural agricultural sector
|
||||
direction: 1
|
||||
direction: -1
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ observation:
|
|||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: gender
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment probability; hours worked
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment probability difference
|
||||
findings: subsidy increased employment probability (8.5ppts) for poor married mothers
|
||||
channels: increased ability to work through lower childcare burden
|
||||
direction: 1
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ group: poor
|
|||
data: national administrative survey Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares (ENIGH) 2008
|
||||
|
||||
design: simulation
|
||||
method: general equilibrium model, microeconometric simulation model; using Gini coefficient
|
||||
method: general equilibrium model, microeconometric simulation model
|
||||
sample: 30000
|
||||
unit: household
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: income; generational
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
findings: raises average income of poorest households by 23%
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: raises average income of poorest households by 23%; increasing skills decreases inequality
|
||||
channels: cash influx; positive wage effect benefitting those who keep their children at work; direct benefit for human capital increase (school attendance), indirect benefit for increased scarcity of unskilled labor
|
||||
direction: 1
|
||||
direction: -1
|
||||
significance: 2
|
||||
|
||||
notes: study attempts to explictly account for spillover effects
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: spatial; education
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: education
|
||||
findings: improved overall rural education; education inequalities persist along gender, geographical, income lines
|
||||
channels: villagization effect, increased education access
|
||||
|
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: spatial; education; gender
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: consumption; employment
|
||||
measures: consumption
|
||||
findings: sg increase for formal wage and agricultural work for women; sg increase in non-agricultural wage work for men; returns to education lower in agriculture than other self-employment/wage work
|
||||
channels: sector choice changes, increased individual productivity
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
measures: poverty
|
||||
findings: level of payments may have been too small to eliminate long-term adverse effects of market transition; in each country case state transfers to individuals reduced their poverty and were at least short-term beneficial; poverty most feminized in Hungary, least feminized in Bulgaria
|
||||
channels: poverty may have feminized as market transitions progressed; larger positive transfer effects for low-education households
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
direction: -1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes: increased probability for poverty of low-education, large, Roma households
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
|||
theory:
|
||||
limitations:
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: workplace accommodation
|
||||
- intervention: counseling (workplace accommodation)
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 1
|
||||
inequality: disability
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: rtw
|
||||
measures: employment (rtw)
|
||||
findings: successful accommodation requires social component; relationship largest barrier; agency of returnee must be strengthened
|
||||
channels: unsuccessful accommodations rely on the functional aspect; supervisors play primary role in success of accommodation process
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ group: rural workers
|
|||
data: national administrative panel survey British Household Panel Survey (BHPS)
|
||||
|
||||
design: observational
|
||||
method: observational methods with counterfactual approach; Gini coefficient used for income inequality
|
||||
method: observational methods with counterfactual approach
|
||||
sample: 5500
|
||||
unit: households
|
||||
representativeness: subnational, rural
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: spatial; income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: overall insignificant decrease of income inequality; policy will have spatial dimension with rural households more affected; larger positive impact for remote rural households
|
||||
channels: rural component depends on proximity to urban areas through having access to urban markets
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 0 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
direction: -1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 1 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ observation:
|
|||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: gender; education; migration
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment probability
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment; hours worked
|
||||
findings: child care price reduction increased female labour supply (about 5pct); no impact on mothers already participating in labour market; stronger impact on low-education mothers, low-income households; no significant impact on immigrant mothers
|
||||
channels: day care expenditure larger part of low-income/-education households creating larger impact; may also be due to average lower employment rates for those households
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ observation:
|
|||
agency: 1
|
||||
inequality: gender; generational; income
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment; human capital
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment
|
||||
findings: free childcare significantly increases work participation of mothers (14ppts); increases human capital of children
|
||||
channels: subsidy removes associated childcare costs (fewer childcare hours)
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: spatial
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment probability
|
||||
measures: employment
|
||||
findings: power sector decarbonisation positively impacts rural workers through increased employment probability
|
||||
channels: attachment of larger-scale renewable energy to rural sectors increases employment scarcity
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes: highest impact in construction and manufacturing sector, long-term large impact in power sector, stable impacts throughout in service sectors and others
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
|||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: can not locate active ingredient
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: training (benefits counseling)
|
||||
- intervention: counseling (benefits counseling)
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 0
|
||||
agency: 1
|
||||
inequality: disability
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: rtw; hours worked
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: hours worked (rtw)
|
||||
findings: counseling had significant increas on more waged days worked; on average 3 additional days worked in 28 days preceding measurement
|
||||
channels: not clear, neither belief about work, benefits, nor mental health/substance abuse service use increased significantly
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: age; disability
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: rtw
|
||||
measures: employment (rtw)
|
||||
findings: vocational and educational services help strengthen individual agency and motivation; potential disability payment loss may impede skills development efforts
|
||||
channels: primary barriers health problems, programmes not accomodating disabled veteran student needs; primary facilitator financial assistance for education and individual motivation
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ group: poor
|
|||
data: national administrative survey 'Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicılio' (PNAD)
|
||||
|
||||
design: quasi-experimental
|
||||
method: beta convergence test; using Gini coefficient
|
||||
method: beta convergence test
|
||||
sample: 27
|
||||
unit: region
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: spatial; income
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: incomes have converged between regions after introduction of cash transfer and minimum wage with both accounting for 26.2% of effect; minimum wage contributed 16.6% to overall Gini reduction, transfers 9.6%
|
||||
channels: quasi-regional effects through predominant transfers to poorer regions
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 1 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
direction: -1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -21,8 +21,20 @@ representativeness: national
|
|||
causal: 1
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: suvey data limited to per dwelling, can not account for inhabitants moving
|
||||
limitations: survey data limited to per dwelling, can not account for inhabitants moving
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: minimum wage
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
structural: 0
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0
|
||||
indicator: 0
|
||||
measures: poverty
|
||||
findings: within three months of minimum wage increases poverty declined by 2.8%
|
||||
channels:
|
||||
direction: -1
|
||||
significance: 2
|
||||
- intervention: minimum wage
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
structural: 0
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,10 +42,10 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0
|
||||
indicator: 1
|
||||
measures: poverty; income
|
||||
findings: within three months of minimum wage increases poverty declined by 2.8%, inequality declined by 2.4%; decreasing impact over time; diminishing returns when minimum is high relative to median earnings
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: inequality declined by 2.4%; decreasing impact over time; diminishing returns when minimum is high relative to median earnings
|
||||
channels: unemployment costs (job losses) overwhelmed by benefits (higher wages); but inelastic relationship of increase and changes in poverty
|
||||
direction: 1
|
||||
direction: -1
|
||||
significance: 2
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ observation:
|
|||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: gender; class; spatial
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment; empowerment
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment
|
||||
findings: insignificant increased employment probability; advantaged women predominantly belong to dominant castes
|
||||
channels: project capture by village female elites; women of disadvantaged castes further excluded from training and work opportunities
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ group: wage workers
|
|||
data: national employment survey (ENEMDU)
|
||||
|
||||
design: quasi-experimental
|
||||
method: difference-in-difference approach; relies on GINI coeff for inequality
|
||||
method: difference-in-difference approach
|
||||
sample: 1_624_422
|
||||
unit: individual
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
|
|
@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ observation:
|
|||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
findings: significant increase on income of low-wage earners; larger effect for agricultural workers, smaller for women; potentially negative impact on income of high-earners
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: decreased income inequality through significant increase on income of low-wage earners; larger effect for agricultural workers, smaller for women; potentially negative impact on income of high-earners
|
||||
channels: income-compression effect
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
direction: -1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
- intervention: minimum wage
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: hours worked
|
||||
findings: significant effect on hours worked; no significant spillover effect on workers in control group; significant negative impact on female hours worked
|
||||
channels: possibly decreased intensive margin for female workers; affecting lower income increase of women
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
|
|||
usage-count-last-180-days = {0},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {12},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Economics},
|
||||
keywords = {done::extracted,inequality::income,relevant,type::regulation},
|
||||
keywords = {direction::vertical,done::extracted,inequality::income,relevant,type::regulation},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/QR2I7K2X/Adams_Atsu_2015_Assessing the distributional effects of regulation in developing countries.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue