feat(data): Extract Delesalle2021
This commit is contained in:
parent
12964bade3
commit
09e2ae6317
4 changed files with 77 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -3474,7 +3474,7 @@ does NOT look at inequalities affected}
|
|||
usage-count-last-180-days = {5},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {10},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Development Studies; Economics},
|
||||
keywords = {country::Tanzania,inequality::education,inequality::gender,region::SSA,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::structural},
|
||||
keywords = {country::Tanzania,done::extracted,inequality::education,inequality::gender,inequality::spatial,method::quantitative,region::SSA,relevant,type::structural},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/NEHUSPFQ/Delesalle_2021_The effect of the Universal Primary Education program on consumption and on the.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -9323,8 +9323,10 @@ does NOT look at results of specific policy interventions}
|
|||
usage-count-last-180-days = {0},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {3},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Business, Finance},
|
||||
keywords = {country::Romania,inequality::age,inequality::gender,method::quantitative,region::EU,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::pension},
|
||||
note = {International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts (SGEM 2014), Albena, BULGARIA, SEP 01-10, 2014}
|
||||
keywords = {country::Romania,inequality::age,inequality::gender,method::quantitative,out::full-text,region::EU,relevant,type::pension},
|
||||
note = {looks at inequality; PI;
|
||||
\par
|
||||
NO LM adjacency for outcomes}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Moawad2021,
|
||||
|
|
59
02-data/processed/relevant/Delesalle2021.yml
Normal file
59
02-data/processed/relevant/Delesalle2021.yml
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|||
author: Delesalle, E.
|
||||
year: 2021
|
||||
title: "The effect of the Universal Primary Education program on consumption and on the employment sector: Evidence from Tanzania"
|
||||
publisher: World Development
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105345
|
||||
pubtype: article
|
||||
discipline: development
|
||||
|
||||
country: Tanzania
|
||||
period: 2002-2012
|
||||
maxlength: 36
|
||||
targeting: implicit
|
||||
group: rural workers
|
||||
data: Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) Population and Housing Census 2002; Living Standards Measurement Study-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (LSMS-ISA)
|
||||
|
||||
design: quasi-experimental
|
||||
method: difference-in-difference approach; IV approach
|
||||
sample: 433606
|
||||
unit: individual
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory: human capital theory
|
||||
limitations: can not directly identify intervention compliers, constructing returns for household heads; 'villagization' effect may have impacted unobserved variables affecting returns
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: universal education
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: spatial; education
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: education
|
||||
findings: improved overall rural education; education inequalities persist along gender, geographical, income lines
|
||||
channels: villagization effect, increased education access
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
- intervention: universal education
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 1
|
||||
inequality: spatial; education; gender
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: consumption; employment
|
||||
findings: sg increase for formal wage and agricultural work for women; sg increase in non-agricultural wage work for men; returns to education lower in agriculture than other self-employment/wage work
|
||||
channels: sector choice changes, increased individual productivity
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes: programme increased primary education access and introduced more technical curriculum
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study looking at the returns of the Tanzanian 'Universal Primary Education' program on consumption and on rural labour market outcomes.
|
||||
The programme both attempted to increase access to schools but also changed curricula to contain more technical classes, judged relevant to increase equity in rural areas.
|
||||
Even though the programme aims to increase universal equality of access to education, the study finds that gender, geographical and income inequalities persist throughout, with individuals that complete primary education more likely to be male urban wage workers.
|
||||
The study measures returns purely on consumption of households to show the estimated effect on their productivity ---
|
||||
here, it finds generally positive returns but greatest for non-agricultural work, self-employed or as wage work.
|
||||
Importantly, the introduction of more technical classes, however, also changes employment sector choices, with men working less in agricultural work and more in non-farm wage sectors and an increased probability for rural women to both work in agriculture and to work formally.
|
||||
Limitations of the study include the inability to directly identify intervention compliers and having to construct returns for each household head only and a possibly unobserved 'villagization' effect by bringing people together in community villages for their education leading to other unobserved variable impacting the returns.
|
|
@ -3540,7 +3540,7 @@ does NOT look at inequalities affected}
|
|||
usage-count-last-180-days = {5},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {10},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Development Studies; Economics},
|
||||
keywords = {country::Tanzania,inequality::education,inequality::gender,region::SSA,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::structural},
|
||||
keywords = {country::Tanzania,done::extracted,inequality::education,inequality::gender,inequality::spatial,method::quantitative,region::SSA,relevant,type::structural},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/NEHUSPFQ/Delesalle_2021_The effect of the Universal Primary Education program on consumption and on the.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -9656,8 +9656,10 @@ does NOT look at results of specific policy interventions}
|
|||
usage-count-last-180-days = {0},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {3},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Business, Finance},
|
||||
keywords = {country::Romania,inequality::age,inequality::gender,method::quantitative,region::EU,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::pension},
|
||||
note = {International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts (SGEM 2014), Albena, BULGARIA, SEP 01-10, 2014}
|
||||
keywords = {country::Romania,inequality::age,inequality::gender,method::quantitative,out::full-text,region::EU,relevant,type::pension},
|
||||
note = {looks at inequality; PI;
|
||||
\par
|
||||
NO LM adjacency for outcomes}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Moawad2021,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -640,6 +640,14 @@ Gender inequality is the second most reviewed dimension of workplace inequality
|
|||
with a variety of studies looking at predominantly it through the lens of female economic empowerment or through closing gender pay gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- economic empowerment and wage gap -->
|
||||
Looking at the returns of the Tanzanian 'Universal Primary Education' programme on consumption and on rural labour market outcomes, @Delesalle2021, finds outcomes that additionally differ along spatial and gender lines.
|
||||
The programme both attempted to increase access to schools but also changed curricula to contain more technical classes, judged relevant to increase equity in rural areas.
|
||||
Even though the programme aims to increase universal equality of access to education, the study finds that gender, geographical and income inequalities persist throughout, with individuals that complete primary education more likely to be male urban wage workers.
|
||||
The study measures returns purely on consumption of households to show the estimated effect on their productivity ---
|
||||
here, it finds generally positive returns but greatest for non-agricultural work, self-employed or as wage work.
|
||||
Importantly, the introduction of more technical classes, however, also changes employment sector choices, with men working less in agricultural work and more in non-farm wage sectors and an increased probability for rural women to both work in agriculture and to work formally.
|
||||
Limitations of the study include the inability to directly identify intervention compliers and having to construct returns for each household head only and a possibly unobserved 'villagization' effect by bringing people together in community villages for their education leading to other unobserved variable impacting the returns.
|
||||
|
||||
In an observational study looking at the inclusive or exclusionary effects of infrastructure development, @Stock2021 analyses the 'gender inclusive' development of a solar park in India which specifically aims to work towards micro-scale equality through regional uplifting.
|
||||
The project included a training and temporary employment to local unskilled/semi-skilled labour.
|
||||
It finds that the development instead impacted equality negatively, creating socio-economic exclusion and disproportionately negatively affected women of lower castes.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue