wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/ef7c58b261184ba4653dfe3ad61c43ca-brouwers-e.-p.-m.-a/info.yaml

111 lines
3.8 KiB
YAML
Raw Normal View History

2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
abstract: 'Purpose Whether or not to disclose mental illness or mental health
issues in the work environment is a highly sensitive dilemma. It can
facilitate keeping or finding paid employment, but can also lead to
losing employment or to not being hired, because of discrimination and
stigma. Research questions were: (1) what do stakeholders see as
advantages and disadvantages of disclosing mental illness or mental
health issues in the work environment?; (2) what factors are of
influence on a positive outcome of disclosure? Methods A focus group
study was conducted with five different stakeholder groups: people with
mental illness, Human Resources professionals, employers, work
reintegration professionals, and mental health advocates. Sessions were
audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was
performed by two researchers using AtlasTi-7.5. Results were visually
represented in a diagram to form a theoretical model. Results Concerning
(dis-)advantages of disclosure, six themes emerged as advantages
(improved relationships, authenticity, work environment support,
friendly culture) and two as disadvantages (discrimination and stigma).
Of influence on the disclosure outcome were: Aspects of the disclosure
process, workplace factors, financial factors, and employee factors.
Stakeholders generally agreed, although distinct differences were also
found and discussed in the paper. Conclusion As shown from the
theoretical model, the (non-)disclosure process is complex, and the
outcome is influenced by many factors, most of which cannot be
influenced by the individual with mental illness. However, the theme
`Aspects of the disclosure process'', including subthemes: who to
disclose to, timing, preparation, message content and communication
style is promising for improving work participation of people with
mental illness or mental health issues, because disclosers can
positively influence these aspects themselves.'
affiliation: 'Brouwers, EPM (Corresponding Author), Tilburg Univ, Dept Tranzo, Tilburg
Sch Social \& Behav Sci, NETHLAB, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands.
Brouwers, E. P. M.; Joosen, M. C. W.; Van Weeghel, J., Tilburg Univ, Dept Tranzo,
Tilburg Sch Social \& Behav Sci, NETHLAB, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands.
Joosen, M. C. W., Tilburg Univ, Dept Human Resource Studies, Tilburg Sch Social
\& Behav Sci, NETHLAB, Tilburg, Netherlands.
van Zelst, C., Maastricht Univ, Dept Psychiat \& Neuropsychol, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Van Weeghel, J., Phrenos Ctr Expertise, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Van Weeghel, J., Parnassia Grp, The Hague, Netherlands.'
author: Brouwers, E. P. M. and Joosen, M. C. W. and van Zelst, C. and Van Weeghel,
J.
author-email: e.p.m.brouwers@tilburguniversity.edu
author_list:
- family: Brouwers
given: E. P. M.
- family: Joosen
given: M. C. W.
- family: van Zelst
given: C.
- family: Van Weeghel
given: J.
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09848-z
eissn: 1573-3688
files: []
issn: 1053-0487
journal: JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION
keywords: Discrimination; Stigma; Employment; Mental illness; Disclosure
keywords-plus: 'DECISION AID; WORKPLACE; ILLNESS; ATTITUDES; STIGMA; DISCRIMINATION;
AUTHENTICITY; EXPERIENCES; DISABILITY; EMPLOYMENT'
language: English
month: MAR
number: '1'
number-of-cited-references: '30'
pages: 84-92
papis_id: 1d30270751dc444fb3ea9f53b071f9c9
ref: Brouwers2020disclosenot
times-cited: '62'
title: 'To Disclose or Not to Disclose: A Multi-stakeholder Focus Group Study on Mental
Health Issues in the Work Environment'
2023-10-01 08:15:07 +00:00
type: article
2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
unique-id: WOS:000514998600007
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
usage-count-since-2013: '46'
volume: '30'
web-of-science-categories: Rehabilitation; Social Issues
year: '2020'