2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
abstract: 'I exploit the introduction of a policy package in France aimed at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
helping parents with the care of young children. The reform affected all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
households with pre-school age children and had two dimensions: a short
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stay-home subsidy for first-time mothers wishing to take-up parental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
leave and an increase in childcare subsidies for parents using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
childminders-the main formal care option in France. Importantly,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
policymakers did not explicitly intervene in the childcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
infrastructures. I rely on a diff-in-diff empirical strategy to evaluate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the labour market outcomes of mothers with pre-school age children in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the short-run and the long-run. The reform had negligible effects in the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
short-run. In the long-run though, first-time mothers-and particularly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the lower-educated group-took advantage of the parental leave subsidies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to reduce their employment rate. This freed up formal childcare places
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and allowed middle-class educated mothers of two children to use the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more generous childcare subsidies and therefore work more. The fact that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the effects take time to materialise and do not appear at the aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
level for the targeted population suggests that the policy did not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
induce any net increase in the supply of care places and simply led to a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
re-allocation of care modes among mothers of pre-school age children.'
|
|
|
|
|
author: de Muizon, Marc Jourdain
|
|
|
|
|
author-email: marcdemuizon@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
author_list:
|
|
|
|
|
- family: de Muizon
|
|
|
|
|
given: Marc Jourdain
|
|
|
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
|
|
|
|
doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09489-9
|
|
|
|
|
earlyaccessdate: JUN 2020
|
|
|
|
|
eissn: 1573-7152
|
|
|
|
|
files: []
|
|
|
|
|
issn: 1569-5239
|
|
|
|
|
journal: REVIEW OF ECONOMICS OF THE HOUSEHOLD
|
|
|
|
|
keywords: Labour supply; Maternity leave; Parental leave; Childcare subsidies
|
|
|
|
|
keywords-plus: 'YOUNG-CHILDREN; LABOR; MOTHERS; WORK; AVAILABILITY; EMPLOYMENT;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTCOMES; REFORM; TIME'
|
|
|
|
|
language: English
|
|
|
|
|
month: SEP
|
|
|
|
|
number: '3'
|
|
|
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '33'
|
|
|
|
|
pages: 735-772
|
|
|
|
|
papis_id: 73d5f317845a613c8fa2caaa453bafbe
|
|
|
|
|
ref: Demuizon2020subsidiesparental
|
|
|
|
|
times-cited: '4'
|
|
|
|
|
title: 'Subsidies for parental leave and formal childcare: be careful what you wish
|
|
|
|
|
for'
|
2023-10-01 08:15:07 +00:00
|
|
|
type: article
|
2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000537991600001
|
|
|
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
|
|
|
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '7'
|
|
|
|
|
volume: '18'
|
|
|
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Economics
|
|
|
|
|
year: '2020'
|
