2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
abstract: 'Uruguay began liberalizing its economy in the 1970s. The process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
continued through the 1990s when the country joined Mercosur. The
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reforms were mainly oriented at liberalizing trade and financial flows,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
much less was done in terms of privatization and public sector reform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uruguay established itself as a regional financial and offshore banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
centre. In the early 1990s, inflation was stabilized on the basis of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
high capital inflows and a stabilization policy that used the exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rate as a nominal anchor. The ensuing real exchange rate appreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
harmed export growth with the rest of the world and, along with the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
surge in capital inflows, pushed up import demand. Real appreciation of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange rate against Uruguay''s trading partners in Mercosur was
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
virtually nil and exports benefited from the new set of trade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preferences within the group. This made macroeconomic performance in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uruguay strongly dependent on the business cycle in Argentina and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil. When these two countries shifted away from a fix on the nominal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exchange rate, starting with the floating of the Brazilian real,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uruguay''s exports were severely hit pushing the economy into recession.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recession was deepened with Argentina''s crisis at the turn of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
century. Uruguay''s economic recovery from the sharp decline in the first
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
half of the 1980s thus lasted until 1998. Employment increased, despite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
job losses in agriculture and manufacturing following productivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
growth associated with the opening process. Employment growth was
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
particularly strong in services. Job shedding in manufacturing was also
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
associated with a fall-out of many firms in import-competing sectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real labour incomes also increased during this period of growth. Skilled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
workers were the main beneficiaries as structural adjustment made
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
production more skill intensive. Labour income inequality increased, but
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
overall employment and real wage increases allowed for a visible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reduction in poverty. These trends reversed after 1998. Simulations with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the computable general equilibrium for Uruguay confirm the positive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effects of trade liberalization in the context of an appreciated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exchange rate on growth and poverty reduction. The simulations also
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
suggest that further negotiated trade liberalization in the context of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Free Trade Area of the Americas or the World Trade Organization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(WTO) would reinforce these effects. With further unilateral trade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
liberalization export growth would require maintaining the exchange rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
competitive, while employment growth would be served with allowing for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
some appreciation of the currency. In the case of negotiated,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
multilateral trade liberalization the nature of the exchange rate regime
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
does not appear to matter for Uruguay in order to reap the gains from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trade. World market prices would move in favour of Uruguay''s exports,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
particularly under a WTO scenario that would benefit its agricultural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exports. Unskilled workers would be the principal beneficiaries of such
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a scenario and poverty and inequality would be reduced. It seems to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
confirm Uruguay''s paradoxical relationship with trade integration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercosur brought both trade benefits and greater vulnerability to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
volatility of the economies of its large neighbours, Argentina and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil, while WTO equally would bring trade gains but enhance the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
country''s vulnerability to the volatility in primary commodity markets.'
|
|
|
|
affiliation: 'Laens, S (Corresponding Author), CINVE, Montevideo, Uruguay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laens, Silvia; Perera, Marcelo, CINVE, Montevideo, Uruguay.'
|
|
|
|
author: Laens, Silvia and Perera, Marcelo
|
|
|
|
author_list:
|
|
|
|
- family: Laens
|
|
|
|
given: Silvia
|
|
|
|
- family: Perera
|
|
|
|
given: Marcelo
|
|
|
|
booktitle: 'WHO GAINS FROM FREE TRADE: EXPORT-LED GROWTH, INEQUALITY AND POVERTY IN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LATIN AMERICA'
|
|
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
|
|
|
editor: Vos, R and Ganuza, E and Morley, S and Robinson, S
|
|
|
|
files: []
|
|
|
|
isbn: 978-0-203-96583-2
|
|
|
|
language: English
|
|
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '21'
|
|
|
|
pages: 361-392
|
|
|
|
papis_id: 9b450d588204d90f1a09e2950b34ad5b
|
|
|
|
ref: Laens2006uruguayexport
|
|
|
|
series: Routledge Studies in Development Economics
|
|
|
|
times-cited: '0'
|
|
|
|
title: Uruguay - export growth, poverty and income distribution
|
2023-10-01 08:15:07 +00:00
|
|
|
type: article
|
2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000278891300013
|
|
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
|
|
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '4'
|
|
|
|
volume: '50'
|
|
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Economics
|
|
|
|
year: '2006'
|