2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
abstract: 'Objective Return to work following occupational injury is an important
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rehabilitation milestone; however, it does not mark the end of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return-to-work process. Following a return to the workplace, workers can
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
experience difficulties that compromise their rehabilitation gains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although there has been investigation of factors related to a return to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the workplace, little attention has been paid to understanding what
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
facilitates continued retum-to-work success as this paper aims to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methods This study used data gathered during one-on-one telephone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interviews with 146 people who experienced a work-related injury that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resulted in their being unable to return to their pre-injury job, but
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who returned to work following an extended period of absence and the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of vocational services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results Numerous return-to-work facilitators were reported, including
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
features of the workers'' environmental and personal contexts, as well as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
body function, activities, and participation. Influences that stood out
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included a perception that the work was appropriate, supportive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
workplace relationships, and a sense of satisfaction/achievement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
associated with being at work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions The findings support the contention that initiatives aimed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at improving return-to-work outcomes can go beyond the removal of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
barriers to include interventions to circumvent difficulties before they
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
are encountered. Together with providing ideas for interventions, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
study''s findings offer an insight into research and theoretical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
development that might be undertaken to further the understanding of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return-to-work process and the factors that impact upon it.'
|
|
|
|
|
affiliation: 'Young, AE (Corresponding Author), 71 Frankland Rd, Hopkinton, MA 01748
|
|
|
|
|
USA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Young, Amanda E., Liberty Mutual Res Inst Safety, Ctr Disabil Res, Hopkinton, MA
|
|
|
|
|
USA.'
|
|
|
|
|
author: Young, Amanda E.
|
|
|
|
|
author-email: amandae.young@libertymutual.com
|
|
|
|
|
author_list:
|
|
|
|
|
- family: Young
|
|
|
|
|
given: Amanda E.
|
|
|
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
|
|
|
|
doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2986
|
|
|
|
|
eissn: 1795-990X
|
|
|
|
|
files: []
|
|
|
|
|
issn: 0355-3140
|
|
|
|
|
journal: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT \& HEALTH
|
|
|
|
|
keywords: 'disablement; long-term sickness absence; return-to-work; vocational
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rehabilitation'
|
|
|
|
|
keywords-plus: 'TO-WORK; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS; REDUCED PRODUCTIVITY; BACK-PAIN;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BARRIERS; DISABILITY; HEALTH; REHABILITATION; EXPERIENCES; PERCEPTIONS'
|
|
|
|
|
language: English
|
|
|
|
|
month: NOV
|
|
|
|
|
number: '6'
|
|
|
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '47'
|
|
|
|
|
orcid-numbers: Young, Amanda Ellen/0000-0002-7288-3469
|
|
|
|
|
pages: 473-483
|
|
|
|
|
papis_id: b86831b8dc80b712ec01f287c43f5953
|
|
|
|
|
ref: Young2010returnwork
|
|
|
|
|
researcherid-numbers: 'Normandeau, Amanda/HHN-8881-2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Young, Amanda Ellen/HDN-1629-2022'
|
|
|
|
|
times-cited: '49'
|
|
|
|
|
title: Return to work following disabling occupational injury - facilitators of employment
|
|
|
|
|
continuation
|
2023-10-01 08:15:07 +00:00
|
|
|
type: article
|
2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000283701800007
|
|
|
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
|
|
|
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '16'
|
|
|
|
|
volume: '36'
|
|
|
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health
|
|
|
|
|
year: '2010'
|
