wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/c6a24a37f95ae09f7609bff8e9d2ea92-hyland-colby-j.-and/info.yaml

147 lines
4.8 KiB
YAML
Raw Normal View History

2023-09-28 14:46:10 +00:00
abstract: 'Plain English summary Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) allow doctors and
researchers to understand the patient perspective, such as how they are
doing physically, mentally, or socially. When used, PROs can improve
health and increase satisfaction of patients. Many clinics and hospitals
are interested in using PROs in everyday care. Doctors, hospitals, and
insurance companies are also using information from PROs to decide if
the care they give is good quality. Unfortunately, certain groups of
patients, such as racial and ethnic minorities and patients with low
income, report worse PROs. Because of these differences, it will be
important to make sure that PROs are being collected from all people,
but not much is known regarding how this has been done. This study
demonstrates what is known so far with regard to using PROs in everyday
clinical care for these diverse patient groups. Findings from this study
show that PROs can be successfully collected, but more work is needed in
certain medical fields, and some types of patients have specific needs,
concerns, or preferences with regard to PRO collection.
Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly in
routine clinical care and inform policies, reimbursements, and quality
improvement. Less is known regarding PRO implementation in routine
clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations.
Objective This review aims to identify studies of PRO implementation in
diverse and underrepresented patient populations, elucidate
representation of clinical specialties, assess implementation outcomes,
and synthesize patient needs, concerns, and preferences. Methods
MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched
September 2021 for studies aiming to study PRO implementation in diverse
and underrepresented patient populations within the United States.
Studies were screened and data extracted by three independent reviewers.
Implementation outcomes were assessed according to Proctor et al.
taxonomy. A descriptive analysis of data was conducted. Results The
search yielded 8,687 records, and 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The
majority were observational cohort studies (n = 21, 75\%) and conducted
in primary care (n = 10, 36\%). Most studies included majority female (n
= 19, 68\%) and non-White populations (n = 15, 54\%), while fewer
reported socioeconomic (n = 11, 39\%) or insurance status (n = 9,
32.1\%). Most studies assessed implementation outcomes of feasibility (n
= 27, 96\%) and acceptability (n = 19, 68\%); costs (n = 3, 11\%),
penetration (n = 1, 4\%), and sustainability (n = 1, 4\%) were
infrequently assessed. Conclusion PRO implementation in routine clinical
care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations is generally
feasible and acceptable. Research is lacking in key clinical
specialties. Further work is needed to understand how health disparities
drive PRO implementation outcomes.'
affiliation: 'Hyland, CJ (Corresponding Author), Harvard Med Sch, Brigham \& Womens
Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Hyland, Colby J.; Guo, Ruby; Kaur, Manraj N.; Edelen, Maria O.; Pusic, Andrea L.,
Harvard Med Sch, Brigham \& Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Dhawan, Ravi, Brigham \& Womens Hosp, Harvard Sch Publ Hlth, 75 Francis St, Boston,
MA 02115 USA.
Bain, Paul A., Harvard Med Sch, Countway Lib, Boston, MA 02115 USA.'
article-number: '20'
author: Hyland, Colby J. and Guo, Ruby and Dhawan, Ravi and Kaur, Manraj N. and Bain,
Paul A. and Edelen, Maria O. and Pusic, Andrea L.
author-email: colby.hyland@gmail.com
author_list:
- family: Hyland
given: Colby J.
- family: Guo
given: Ruby
- family: Dhawan
given: Ravi
- family: Kaur
given: Manraj N.
- family: Bain
given: Paul A.
- family: Edelen
given: Maria O.
- family: Pusic
given: Andrea L.
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z
eissn: 2509-8020
files: []
journal: JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES
keywords: 'Patient-reported outcome; Patient-reported outcome measure; PRO; PROM;
Clinical care; Implementation; Diverse; Underrepresented patient
population'
keywords-plus: 'SOCIAL DETERMINANTS; HEALTH-CARE; DISPARITIES; DEPRESSION; IMPACT;
COLLECTION; LESSONS; BURDEN; ADULTS; TRIAL'
language: English
month: MAR 7
number: '1'
number-of-cited-references: '74'
orcid-numbers: Hyland, Colby/0000-0002-9150-0144
papis_id: dbdcbe5c626ea2d1bd405da04adc9dce
ref: Hyland2022implementingpatientr
tags:
- review
times-cited: '4'
title: Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse
and underrepresented patients in the United States
type: Review
unique-id: WOS:000765775000002
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
usage-count-since-2013: '3'
volume: '6'
web-of-science-categories: Health Care Sciences \& Services; Health Policy \& Services
year: '2022'