101 lines
3.1 KiB
YAML
101 lines
3.1 KiB
YAML
|
abstract: 'Healthy worker survivor bias may occur in occupational studies due to
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
the tendency for unhealthy individuals to leave work earlier, and
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
consequently accrue less exposure, compared with their healthier
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
counterparts. If occupational data are not analyzed using appropriate
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
methods, this bias can result in attenuation or even reversal of the
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
estimated effects of exposures on health outcomes. Recent advances in
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
computing power, coupled with state-of-the-art statistical methods, have
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
greatly increased the ability of analysts to control healthy worker
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
survivor bias. However, these methods have not been widely adopted by
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
occupational epidemiologists. We update the seminal review by Arrighi
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
and Hertz-Picciotto (Epidemiology. 1994; 5: 186-196) of the sources and
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
methods to control healthy worker survivor bias. In our update, we
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
discuss methodologic advances since the publication of that review,
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
notably with a consideration of how directed acyclic graphs can inform
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
the choice of appropriate analytic methods. We summarize and discuss
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
methods for addressing this bias, including recent work applying
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
g-methods to account for employment status as a time-varying covariate
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
affected by prior exposure. In the presence of healthy worker survivor
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
bias, g-methods have advantages for estimating less biased parameters
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
that have direct policy implications and are clearly communicated to
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
decision-makers.'
|
||
|
|
affiliation: 'Buckley, JP (Corresponding Author), Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol,
|
||
|
|
CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Buckley, Jessie P.; Keil, Alexander P.; McGrath, Leah J.; Edwards, Jessie K., Univ
|
||
|
|
N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
|
||
|
|
USA.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
McGrath, Leah J., RTI Hlth Solut, Chapel Hill, NC USA.'
|
||
|
|
author: Buckley, Jessie P. and Keil, Alexander P. and McGrath, Leah J. and Edwards,
|
||
|
|
Jessie K.
|
||
|
|
author-email: jessbuck@unc.edu
|
||
|
|
author_list:
|
||
|
|
- family: Buckley
|
||
|
|
given: Jessie P.
|
||
|
|
- family: Keil
|
||
|
|
given: Alexander P.
|
||
|
|
- family: McGrath
|
||
|
|
given: Leah J.
|
||
|
|
- family: Edwards
|
||
|
|
given: Jessie K.
|
||
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
||
|
|
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000217
|
||
|
|
eissn: 1531-5487
|
||
|
|
files: []
|
||
|
|
issn: 1044-3983
|
||
|
|
journal: EPIDEMIOLOGY
|
||
|
|
keywords-plus: 'LUNG-CANCER MORTALITY; OCCUPATIONAL ASBESTOS EXPOSURE;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
FAILURE-TIME-MODELS; ACTIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
MODELS; PARAMETRIC G-FORMULA; MEASUREMENT ERROR; INTERNAL COMPARISONS;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
CUMULATIVE EXPOSURE; CAUSAL INFERENCE'
|
||
|
|
language: English
|
||
|
|
month: MAR
|
||
|
|
number: '2'
|
||
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '62'
|
||
|
|
orcid-numbers: 'Keil, Alexander/0000-0002-0955-6107
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Edwards, Jessie/0000-0002-1741-335X
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Buckley, Jessie/0000-0001-7976-0157'
|
||
|
|
pages: 204-212
|
||
|
|
papis_id: c1ceb9bc0c2c49bf8c06742e587c3b26
|
||
|
|
ref: Buckley2015evolvingmethods
|
||
|
|
researcherid-numbers: 'Keil, Alexander/CAE-8705-2022
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
'
|
||
|
|
tags:
|
||
|
|
- review
|
||
|
|
times-cited: '70'
|
||
|
|
title: Evolving Methods for Inference in the Presence of Healthy Worker Survivor Bias
|
||
|
|
type: Review
|
||
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000349400300026
|
||
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
|
||
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '16'
|
||
|
|
volume: '26'
|
||
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health
|
||
|
|
year: '2015'
|