90 lines
3 KiB
YAML
90 lines
3 KiB
YAML
|
abstract: 'Scholars and policymakers who call for social investment (SI) policies
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
hope that SI policies reduce income inequality and poverty, among other
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
policy goals. Meanwhile, some others point out potentially less pro-poor
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
effects of SI policies. There are relatively few cross-national studies
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
that empirically examine the distributional effects of SI policies. The
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
current study seeks to fill the gap by investigating the effects of SI
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
policies on income inequality in OECD countries. The empirical analysis
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
finds mixed results. Parental leave benefits reduce market income
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
inequality, but other family support policies do not lessen inequality,
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
and family allowances and paid leave (the length of generous leave) even
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
increase it. The effects of some family policies are partly
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
context-specific. In contexts where there are a large number of
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
single-mother households, parental leave benefits reduce market income
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
inequality. There is no stable evidence that education and active labour
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
market policy (ALMP) reduce market income inequality. Education and
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ALMP, however, reduce disposable income inequality (even after
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
controlling for left governments and Nordic countries). The article
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
suggests that in countries with high education and/or ALMP spending, the
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
skills of workers towards the lower end of the income distribution may
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
be relatively high (even though their pre-tax and transfer income may be
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
low), and it may make their income salvageable with redistributive
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
policies. In this sense, SI policies and conventional redistributive
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
policies may be complementary in reducing disposable income inequality.'
|
||
|
|
affiliation: 'Sakamoto, T (Corresponding Author), Meiji Gakuin Univ, Fac Int Studies,
|
||
|
|
Totsuka Ku, 1518 Kamikuratacho, Yokohama, Kanagawa 1088636, Japan.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Sakamoto, Takayuki, Meiji Gakuin Univ, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.'
|
||
|
|
article-number: 09589287211018146
|
||
|
|
author: Sakamoto, Takayuki
|
||
|
|
author-email: halosakamoto@gmail.com
|
||
|
|
author_list:
|
||
|
|
- family: Sakamoto
|
||
|
|
given: Takayuki
|
||
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
||
|
|
doi: 10.1177/09589287211018146
|
||
|
|
earlyaccessdate: JUL 2021
|
||
|
|
eissn: 1461-7269
|
||
|
|
files: []
|
||
|
|
issn: 0958-9287
|
||
|
|
journal: JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY
|
||
|
|
keywords: 'Active labour market policy; education; family support; income
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
inequality; industrial democracies; social investment policy; welfare
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
states'
|
||
|
|
keywords-plus: '18 OECD COUNTRIES; FAMILY POLICIES; POVERTY; REDISTRIBUTION; EMPLOYMENT;
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
GROWTH'
|
||
|
|
language: English
|
||
|
|
month: OCT
|
||
|
|
number: '4'
|
||
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '41'
|
||
|
|
orcid-numbers: Sakamoto, Takayuki/0000-0002-6810-5322
|
||
|
|
pages: 440-456
|
||
|
|
papis_id: 379ff2121ed2a2247c87000f3976d8d5
|
||
|
|
ref: Sakamoto2021dosocial
|
||
|
|
researcherid-numbers: Sakamoto, Takayuki/A-9159-2009
|
||
|
|
times-cited: '4'
|
||
|
|
title: Do social investment policies reduce income inequality? An analysis of industrial
|
||
|
|
countries
|
||
|
|
type: Article
|
||
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000675798000001
|
||
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
|
||
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '18'
|
||
|
|
volume: '31'
|
||
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Public Administration; Social Issues
|
||
|
|
year: '2021'
|