38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
### Missing
|
|
|
|
* informal/formal switches and stats
|
|
|
|
### [ ] vandeWalle2004
|
|
|
|
results:
|
|
* looks at causes of poverty and incidence and participation in rural off-farm activities (1993-1998)
|
|
* some common causative factors, education, region of residence
|
|
* however generally processes determining both are not the same
|
|
* participation in rural non-farm market economy allows *some* route out of poverty but certainly not all
|
|
|
|
### [ ] McCaig2013
|
|
|
|
results:
|
|
* analyzing structural economic changes 1990-2008
|
|
* structural changes account for 1/3rd of labor productivity growth (which was ~5.1% per year)
|
|
* move from agriculture toward services and manufacturing, from household businesses to firms in enterprise sector, reallocation of workers from state-owned to private domestic and foreign owned firms
|
|
* especially manufacturing grew (8->14% of workforce)
|
|
|
|
primary determinants: changes in trade policy, expansion of employment in foreign owned firms, declining role of state owned enterprises
|
|
|
|
### [ ] McCaig2014
|
|
|
|
results:
|
|
* effects of US-Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement (positive export shock), due to large US tariff reductions on Vietnamese exports
|
|
* increased 5% share of manufacturing workers
|
|
* slightly increased gap of labor productivity
|
|
|
|
### [ ] McCaig2015
|
|
|
|
results:
|
|
* effects of economic changes to workforce transitions informal -> formal
|
|
* younger workers, esp migrants, more likely to work in formal sector and stay in it
|
|
* decline in aggregate share in informal employment bc of changes between and within birth cohorts
|
|
* younger, educated, male, urban workers more likely to switch than others
|
|
* little educated, older, female, rural workers least likely to switch
|
|
* formalization coincides with occupational upgrading
|