78 lines
6.7 KiB
Markdown
78 lines
6.7 KiB
Markdown
### [ ] vandeWalle2001
|
||
|
||
results:
|
||
* ethnic minorities predominantly living in (remote) rural areas and lower living standards than ethnic majority
|
||
* primarily due to environmental differences (difficult terrain, poor infrastructure, less access to off-farm work and market economy, inferior access to education)
|
||
* compounded by social immobility and regional differences in living standards
|
||
* does little to help using ethnic majority way of policy, must be specifically designed to reach minority households in poor areas; requires e.g. infrastructure development to change market disadvantages, isolation and social exclusion
|
||
|
||
### [ ] Baulch2012
|
||
|
||
results: (real) welfare (consumption) inequality between ethnic minorities and majority 1993-2004 increased by 14.6%; ~40% of gap due to endowments (primarily demographic structure and education), at least half due to differences in returns to endowments; geographic variables less than 20% of gap; much of gap 'linked to temporal changes in unobservable factors'
|
||
* some additional suggested drivers are lack of ability in Vietnamese language, distance to commune/district centers amplifying effects
|
||
* but not well-determined across time and thus lot of conjecture that unobservables may be due to: negative stereotyping, poort understanding of minority customs/cultures, unobserved variation in household-level endowments (land quality, distance to commune centre, education)
|
||
|
||
### [x] Benjamin2017 - Growth with Equity: Income Inequality in Vietnam, 2002–14
|
||
|
||
* economic/trade liberalization reforms:
|
||
* Enterprise Law (2000)
|
||
* US-Vietnam Bilateral Trade Agreement (2001)
|
||
* accession to WTO (2007)
|
||
* tightly integrated in international economy:
|
||
* rising inflows of FDI
|
||
* increased trade-to-GDP ratio
|
||
* economic shifts:
|
||
* ongoing shift of GDP/labor from agriculture to manufacturing/services [@Cling2009; @McCaig2013; @McCaig2014; @McCaig2015]
|
||
* sustained high rates of overall economic growth
|
||
* even throughout 2008+ (with declining external demand, tightening monetary/fiscal policies) (real) GDP per capita grew 5.1% annually
|
||
* similar trajectory to China - even more remarkable rates of growth over a longer period of time but at cost of higher inequality
|
||
|
||
* marked reduction in absolute poverty in country
|
||
* rate of decline slowed somewhat since mid-2000s [@WorldBank2012; @VASS2006; @VASS2011]
|
||
* some decline can be directly attributed to liberalization of markets instead of growth more generally [@McCaig2011; @Benjamin2004; @Edmonds2006]
|
||
* inequality in Vietnam is largely intersectional between ethnicity, regional situation, and a strong rural-urban divide
|
||
* persistent poverty severe among ethnic minorities [@Baulch2012]
|
||
* [@WorldBank2012; Baulch2012; vandeWalle2001; vandeWalle2004]
|
||
* consumption inequality since early 1990s has been relatively constant, moving within narrow range
|
||
* income inequality markers werwe (and are) significantly higher than consumption measures, but dropped sharply in the 1990s
|
||
* flattening off in 2000s
|
||
* robust grwoth in agricultural incomes were and continue to play an important role in moderating inequality increases (through other sources of income) [@Benjamin2004]
|
||
|
||
* looks at income growth and inequality over time (2002-2014) and importantly the income sources
|
||
* "The decompositions allow us to identify the income sources, and thus markets, that underlie Vietnam's particular experience of structural change, growth, and distribution of income." [27]
|
||
* construction household per capita income, including a moderate grwoth slow-down in 2010.
|
||
* **overall small income inequality decrease in Vietnam (2002-2014)**
|
||
* suggests growth has been accompanied by equity extending beyond poverty reduction
|
||
* rural inequality slightly increased, urban decreased
|
||
* rural driven by slow income grwoth among ethnic minorities - a growing proportion of population
|
||
* incomes of minorities rose, but gap to ethnic majority still widened
|
||
* but offset by decreased urban-rural inequality
|
||
* decomposition insights:
|
||
* farm incomes remain "important, relatively equalizing source of opportunity for rural households"" [27]
|
||
* growth of wage income driven by rising earnings among wage-workers more than increased participation in wage labor
|
||
* sampled stratified into
|
||
* households, communes, districts, provinces, regions
|
||
|
||
While in 2002 the ethnic minority population living in rural areas was below 15% in 2002, it rose to over 18% in 2014 - both due to higher fertility among minorities and ethnic majority Kinh urbanizing at a higher rate - and the ratio of Kinh to minority incomes rose to more than 2.0 in 2014 [@Benjamin2017].
|
||
The same study finds that income inequality rose even more sharply *within* ethnic minorities, while that of rural Kinh, though increasing from 2002 to 2014, fell back to 2002 levels around 2014.
|
||
These findings suggest that the primary drivers of rural income inequality are a growing gap between Kinh and minorities while at the same time a similar rising inequality develops among minority rural populations themselves.
|
||
|
||
* structural income composition: [41]
|
||
* 2002
|
||
* family business & wage income main drivers of income inequality (overall) (>60%) (account for higher share of inequality than income)
|
||
* crop and agricultural sidelines income is relatively equalizing (account for lower share of inequality than income)
|
||
* Gini coefficient: wage and family business very unequally distributed; also remittances and 'other incomes' also unequal but overall small share means they have lower impact
|
||
* 2014:
|
||
* wage income now 42% of total income (30.5% 2002), less unequally distributed, suggesting a labor market that is both more prevalent and more equally distributed
|
||
* however, still majorly correlated with overall income thus driver of inequality (as are remittances)
|
||
* overall, points to labor markets and wage labor opportunities as driver of equality during high growth BUT this is for overall population, not rural/minority population
|
||
<!-- TODO find study for vietnam minority/rural population income inequality (within/to Kinh) -->
|
||
* location inequality:
|
||
* fallen dramatically, inequality increasingly within-location outcome, less due to differences between locations
|
||
* primarily due to migration across locations
|
||
* true for differences between urban/rural within/between provinces
|
||
|
||
Overall: - slight reduction of of inequality through reduction in influence of wage labor on inequality while existing within-rural inequalities, those between Kinh and minorities, and those within minorities are further pushed apart.
|
||
|
||
<!-- TODO look at 2 lowest quintiles -->
|
||
|