Marty Oehme
de5bc68836
Integrated all new snowballing DOIs into Zotero to be screened and extracted.
372 lines
25 KiB
Text
372 lines
25 KiB
Text
1. Hegewisch A, Gornick JC. The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: a review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family. 2011;14(2):119-138.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2011.571395
|
||
|
||
2. Burtle A, Bezruchka S. Population health and paid parental leave: what the United States can learn from two decades of research. Paper presented at: Healthcare 2016.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4020030
|
||
|
||
3. Rossin-Slater M, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J. The effects of California's paid family leave program on mothers' leave-taking and subsequent labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2013;32(2):224-245.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21676
|
||
|
||
4. Borrell C, Palencia L, Muntaner C, Urquia M, Malmusi D, O'Campo P. Influence of macrosocial policies on women's health and gender inequalities in health. Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36: 31-48.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxt002
|
||
|
||
5. Alio AP, Bond MJ, Padilla YC, Heidelbaugh JJ, Lu M, Parker WJ. Addressing policy barriers to paternal involvement during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(4):425-430.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0781-1
|
||
|
||
6. Aitken Z, Garrett CC, Hewitt B, Keogh L, Hocking JS, Kavanagh AM. The maternal health outcomes of paid maternity leave: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:32-41.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.001
|
||
|
||
7. O'Brien M. Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: international perspectives and policy impact. Ann Am Acad Polit SS. 2009;624:190-213.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209334349
|
||
|
||
8. Heymann J, Rho HJ, Schmitt J, Earle A. Ensuring a healthy and productive workforce: comparing the generosity of paid sick day and sick leave policies in 22 countries. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(1):1-22.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.40.1.a
|
||
|
||
9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
|
||
|
||
10. Ulker A, Guven C. Determinants of maternity leave duration in Australia: evidence from the HILDA survey. Econ Rec. 2011;87(278):399-413.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00729.x
|
||
|
||
11. Baird M, Litwin AS. Rethinking work and family policy: the making and taking of parental leave in Australia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005;17(5):385-400.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260500238306
|
||
|
||
12. Baum CL, Ruhm CJ. The effects of paid family leave in California on labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2016;35(2):333356. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21894.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21894
|
||
|
||
13. Raabe PH, Theall KP. An analysis of paid family and sick leave advocacy in Louisiana: lessons learned. Womens Health Issues. 2016;26(5):488-495.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.07.003
|
||
|
||
14. Baker M, Milligan K. How does job-protected maternity leave affect mothers' employment? J Labor Econ. 2008;26(4):655-691. WORLD Policy Analysis Center. OECD Adult Labor Database. 2016. https://www.worldpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/ WORLD%20Report%20-%20Parental%20Leave%20OECD% 20Country%20Approaches_0.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2018.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1086/591955
|
||
|
||
15. Berger LM, Hill J, Waldfogel J. Maternity leave, early maternal employment and child health and development in the US. Econ J (London). 2005;115(501):F29-F47.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00971.x
|
||
|
||
16. Huang R, Yang MZ. Paid maternity leave and breastfeeding practice before and after California's implementation of the nation's first paid family leave program. Econ Hum Biol. 2015;16:45-59.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.009
|
||
|
||
18. Escot L, Fernandez-Cornejo JA, Poza C. Fathers' use of childbirth leave in Spain: the effects of the 13-day paternity leave. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014;33(3):419-453.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9304-7
|
||
|
||
19. Cools S, Fiva JH, Kirkeboen LJ. Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents. Scand J Econ. 2015;117(3):801-828.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12113
|
||
|
||
20. Ekberg J, Eriksson R, Friebel G. Parental leave-a policy evaluation of the Swedish "daddy-month" reform. J Public Econ. 2013;97:131-143.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.001
|
||
|
||
21. Bunning M. What happens after the 'daddy months'? Fathers' involvement in paid work, childcare, and housework after taking parental leave in Germany. Eur Sociol Rev. 2015;31(6): 738-748.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv072
|
||
|
||
22. Lidwall U. Termination of sickness benefits or transition to disability pension after changes in sickness insurance: a Swedish register study. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(2):118-124.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.689920
|
||
|
||
23. Lidwall U, Marklund S. Trends in long-term sickness absence in Sweden, 1992-2008: the role of economic conditions, legislation, demography, work environment and alcohol consumption. Int J Soc Welf. 2011;20(2):167-179.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00744.x
|
||
|
||
24. Hägglund P. Do time limits in the sickness insurance system increase return to work? Empir Econ. 2013;45(1):567-582.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0618-9
|
||
|
||
25. Arrelov B, Borgquist L, Ljungberg D, Svardsudd K. The influence of change of legislation concerning sickness absence on physicians' performance as certifiers: a population-based study. Health Policy. 2003;63(3):259-268.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00081-7
|
||
|
||
26. Aaviksoo E, Kiivet RA. Sickness benefit cuts mainly affect bluecollar workers. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(6):497-503.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814538559
|
||
|
||
27. Aaviksoo E, Kiivet RA. Influence of the sickness benefit reform on sickness absence. Health Policy. 2016;120(9):1070-1078.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.07.014
|
||
|
||
28. De Paola M, Scoppa V, Pupo V. Absenteeism in the Italian public sector: the effects of changes in sick leave policy. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(2):337-360.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1086/674986
|
||
|
||
29. Kausto J, Viikari-Juntura E, Virta LJ, Gould R, Koskinen A, Solovieva S. Effectiveness of new legislation on partial sickness benefit on work participation: a quasi-experiment in Finland. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e006685.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006685
|
||
|
||
30. Kausto J, Miranda H, Martimo KP, Viikari-Juntura E. Partial sick leave: review of its use, effects and feasibility in the Nordic countries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34(4):239249.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1266
|
||
|
||
31. Ziebarth NR, Karlsson M. The effects of expanding the generosity of the statutory sickness insurance system. J Appl Econ. 2014;29(2):208-230.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2317
|
||
|
||
32. Ziebarth NR, Karlsson M. A natural experiment on sick pay cuts, sickness absence, and labor costs. J Public Econ. 2010;94(11):1108-1122.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.001
|
||
|
||
33. Fevang E, Markussen S, Røed K. The sick pay trap. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(2):305-336.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1086/673400
|
||
|
||
34. Schuster MA, Chung PJ, Elliott MN, Garfield CF, Vestal KD, Klein DJ. Awareness and use of California's Paid Family Leave Insurance among parents of chronically ill children. JAMA. 2008;300(9):1047-1055.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.9.1047
|
||
|
||
35. Baum CL. The effect of state maternity leave legislation and the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act on employment and wages. Labour Econ. 2003;10(5):573-596.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00037-X
|
||
|
||
36. Goodpaster NK. Leaves and leaving: the Family and Medical Leave Act and the decline in maternal labor force participation. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1).
|
||
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1996
|
||
|
||
37. Han WJ, Waldfogel J. Parental leave: the impact of recent legislation on parents' leave taking. Demography. 2003;40(1):191-200.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0003
|
||
|
||
38. Rossin M. The effects of maternity leave on children's birth and infant health outcomes in the United States. J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):221-239.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.005
|
||
|
||
39. Schott W. Going back part-time: family leave legislation and women's return to work. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2012;31(1):1-30.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-011-9221-6
|
||
|
||
40. Hofferth SL, Curtin SC. Parental leave statutes and maternal return to work after childbirth in the United States. Work Occup. 2006;33(1):73-105.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888405281889
|
||
|
||
41. Waldfogel J. The impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act. J Policy Anal Manage. 1999;18(2):281-302.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199921)18:2<281::AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-J
|
||
|
||
42. Baum CL. The effects of maternity leave legislation on mothers' labor supply after childbirth. South Econ J. 2003;69(4):772-799.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2003.tb00533.x
|
||
|
||
43. Waldfogel J. Family leave coverage in the 1990s. Mon Labor Rev. 1999;122(10):13-21.
|
||
|
||
44. Washbrook E, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J, Han W-J. Public policies, women's employment after childbearing, and child well-being. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2011;11(1).
|
||
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2938
|
||
|
||
45. Stoddard C, Stock WA, Hogenson E. The impact of maternity leave laws on cesarean delivery. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2016;16(1).
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2015-0015
|
||
|
||
46. Shim J. Family leave policy and child mortality: evidence from 19 OECD countries from 1969 to 2010. Int J Soc Welf. 2016;25(3):215-221.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12186
|
||
|
||
47. Tanaka S. Parental leave and child health across OECD countries. Econ J (London). 2005;115(501):F7-F28.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00970.x
|
||
|
||
48. Ruhm CJ. Parental leave and child health. J Health Econ. 2000;19(6):931-960.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00047-3
|
||
|
||
49. Schober PS. Parental leave and domestic work of mothers and fathers: a longitudinal study of two reforms in West Germany. J Soc Policy. 2014;43(2):351-372.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000809
|
||
|
||
50. Lapuerta I, Baizán P, González MJ. Individual and institutional constraints: an analysis of parental leave use and duration in Spain. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2011;30(2):185-210.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9185-y
|
||
|
||
51. Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):871-887.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006
|
||
|
||
52. Dustmann C, Schonberg U. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and children's long-term outcomes. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012;4(3):190-224.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.3.190
|
||
|
||
53. Rege M, Solli IF. The impact of paternity leave on fathers' future earnings. Demography. 2013;50(6):2255-2277.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0233-1
|
||
|
||
54. Han WJ, Ruhm C, Waldfogel J. Parental leave policies and parents' employment and leave-taking. J Policy Anal Manage. 2009;28(1):29-54.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20398
|
||
|
||
55. Pronzato CD. Return to work after childbirth: does parental leave matter in Europe? Rev Econ Househ. 2009;7(4):341-360.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-009-9059-4
|
||
|
||
56. Schonberg U, Ludsteck J. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and mothers' labor market outcomes after childbirth. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(3):469-505.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1086/675078
|
||
|
||
57. Hanel B. The impact of paid maternity leave rights on labour market outcomes. Econ Rec. 2013;89(286):339-366.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12057
|
||
|
||
58. Geyer J, Haan P, Wrohlich K. The effects of family policy on maternal labor supply: combining evidence from a structural model and a quasi-experimental approach. Labour Econ. 2015;36: 84-98.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.07.001
|
||
|
||
59. Ziefle A, Gangl M. Do women respond to changes in family policy? A quasi-experimental study of the duration of mothers' employment interruptions in Germany. Eur Sociol Rev. 2014;30(5):562-581.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu056
|
||
|
||
60. Ronsen M, Sundstrom M. Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers: a comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. Eur J Popul. 2002;18(2):121-152.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015532305179
|
||
|
||
61. Hanratty M, Trzcinski E. Who benefits from paid family leave? Impact of expansions in Canadian paid family leave on maternal employment and transfer income. J Popul Econ. 2009;22(3):693711.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-008-0211-x
|
||
|
||
62. Matysiak A, Szalma I. Effects of parental leave policies on second birth risks and women's employment entry. Population. 2014;69(4):599-636.
|
||
|
||
63. Bergemann A, Riphahn RT. Female labour supply and parental leave benefits-the causal effect of paying higher transfers for a shorter period of time. Appl Econ Lett. 2010;18(1):17-20.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850903425173
|
||
|
||
64. Geyer J, Haan P, Spieß CK, Wrohlich K. Das Elterngeld und seine Wirkungen auf das Haushaltseinkommen junger Familien und die Erwerbstätigkeit von Müttern [The new German parental leave benefit scheme and its effects on young families' household income and on mothers' paid employment]. ZfF-Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research. 2013;25(2): 193-211.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-153
|
||
|
||
65. Bujard M, Passet J. Wirkungen des Elterngelds auf Einkommen und Fertilität [Effects of the new German parental leave benefit on income and fertility]. ZfF-Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research. 2013;25(2):212-237.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-154
|
||
|
||
66. Winegarden CR, Bracy PM. Demographic consequences of maternal-leave programs in industrial countries: evidence from fixed-effects models. South Econ J. 1995;61(4):1020-1035.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.2307/1060738
|
||
|
||
67. Brugiavini A, Pasini G, Trevisan E. The direct impact of maternity benefits on leave taking: evidence from complete fertility histories. Adv Life Course Res. 2013;18(1):46-67.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2012.10.003
|
||
|
||
68. Akgunduz YE, Plantenga J. Labour market effects of parental leave in Europe. Cambridge J Econ. 2013;37(4):845-862.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes052
|
||
|
||
69. Ruhm CJ. The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: lessons from Europe. Q J Econ. 1998;113(1):285-317.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555586
|
||
|
||
70. Lalive R, Schlosser A, Steinhauer A, Zweimüller J. Parental leave and mothers' careers: the relative importance of job protection and cash benefits. Rev Econ Stud. 2014;81(1):219-265.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt028
|
||
|
||
71. Asai Y. Parental leave reforms and the employment of new mothers: quasi-experimental evidence from Japan. Labour Econ. 2015;36:72-83.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.007
|
||
|
||
72. Waldfogel J. The family gap for young women in the United States and Britain: can maternity leave make a difference? J Labor Econ. 1998;16(3):505-545.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1086/209897
|
||
|
||
73. Waldfogel J, Higuchi Y, Abe M. Family leave policies and women's retention after childbirth: evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. J Popul Econ. 1999;12(4):523-545.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050112
|
||
|
||
74. Kluve J, Tamm M. Parental leave regulations, mothers' labor force attachment and fathers' childcare involvement: evidence from a natural experiment. J Popul Econ. 2013;26(3):9831005.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0404-1
|
||
|
||
75. Del Boca D, Pasqua S, Pronzato C. Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: a European perspective. Oxf Econ Pap. 2009;61(Suppl. 1):i147-i171.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpn046
|
||
|
||
76. Mukhopadhyay S. The effects of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act on female labor supply. Int Econ Rev. 2012;53(4):11331153.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00714.x
|
||
|
||
77. Das T, Polachek SW. Unanticipated effects of California's paid family leave program. Contemp Econ Policy. 2015;33(4):619-635.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12102
|
||
|
||
78. Lalive R, Zweimuller J. How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. Q J Econ. 2009;124(3):1363-1402.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1363
|
||
|
||
79. Joseph O, Pailhe A, Recotillet I, Solaz A. The economic impact of taking short parental leave: evaluation of a French reform. Labour Econ. 2013;25:63-75.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.04.012
|
||
|
||
80. Rasmussen AW. Increasing the length of parents' birth-related leave: the effect on children's long-term educational outcomes. Labour Econ. 2010;17(1):91-100.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.07.007
|
||
|
||
81. Maldonado LC, Nieuwenhuis R. Family policies and single parent poverty in 18 OECD countries, 1978-2008. Community, Work & Family. 2015;18(4):395-415.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1080661
|
||
|
||
82. Misra J, Moller S, Strader E, Wemlinger E. Family policies, employment and poverty among partnered and single mothers. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2012;30(1):113-128.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2011.12.001
|
||
|
||
83. Stier H, Mandel H. Inequality in the family: the institutional aspects of women's earning contribution. Soc Sci Res. 2009;38(3):594-608.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.01.008
|
||
|
||
84. Budig MJ, Misra J, Boeckmann I. Work-family policy trade-offs for mothers? Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work Occup. 2016;43(2):119-177.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415615385
|
||
|
||
85. Erhel C, Guergoat-Larivière M. Labor market regimes, family policies, and women's behavior in the EU. Fem Econ. 2013;19(4):76-109.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.842649
|
||
|
||
86. De Henau J, Meulders D, O'Dorchai S. Maybe baby: comparing partnered women's employment and child policies in the EU-15. Fem Econ. 2010;16(1):43-77.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700903382703
|
||
|
||
87. Pettit B, Hook JL. The structure of women's employment in comparative perspective. Social Forces. 2005;84(2):779-801.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0029
|
||
|
||
88. Fuwa M, Cohen PN. Housework and social policy. Soc Sci Res. 2007;36(2):512-530.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.005
|
||
|
||
89. Hook JL. Gender inequality in the welfare state: sex segregation in housework, 1965-2003. AJS. 2010;115(5):1480-1523.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1086/651384
|
||
|
||
90. Hook JL. Care in context: men's unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003. Am Soc Rev. 2006;71(4):639-660.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100406
|
||
|
||
91. Boll C, Leppin J, Reich N. Paternal childcare and parental leave policies: evidence from industrialized countries. Rev Econ Househ. 2014;12(1):129-158.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9211-z
|
||
|
||
92. Stearns J. The effects of paid maternity leave: evidence from Temporary Disability Insurance. J Health Econ. 2015;43:85-102.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.04.005
|
||
|
||
93. Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):871-887.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006
|
||
|
||
94. Kottwitz A, Oppermann A, Spiess CK. Parental leave benefits and breastfeeding in Germany: effects of the 2007 reform. Rev Econ Househ. 2016;14(4):859-890.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-015-9299-4
|
||
|
||
95. Klevens J, Luo F, Xu L, Peterson C, Latzman NE. Paid family leave's effect on hospital admissions for pediatric abusive head trauma. Inj Prev. 2016;11:11.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041702
|
||
|
||
96. Daku M, Raub A, Heymann J. Maternal leave policies and vaccination coverage: a global analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(2):120124.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.013
|
||
|
||
97. Liu Q, Skans ON. The duration of paid parental leave and children's scholastic performance. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1):1-35.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2329
|
||
|
||
98. Baker M, Milligan K. Evidence from maternity leave expansions of the impact of maternal care on early child development. J Hum Resour. 2010;45(1):1-32.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2010.0007
|
||
|
||
99. Carneiro P, Løken KV, Salvanes KG. A flying start? Maternity leave benefits and long-run outcomes of children. J Polit Econ. 2015;123(2):365-412.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1086/679627
|
||
|
||
100. Engster D, Stensöta HO. Do family policy regimes matter for children's well-being? Soc Polit. 2011;18(1):82-124.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr006
|
||
|
||
101. Avendano M, Berkman LF, Brugiavini A, Pasini G. The long-run effect of maternity leave benefits on mental health: evidence from European countries. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:45-53.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.037
|
||
|
||
102. Duvander A-Z, Johansson M. What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers' parental leave use? J Eur Soc Policy. 2012;22(3):319-330.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440201
|
||
|
||
103. Bünning M, Pollmann-Schult M. Family policies and fathers' working hours: cross-national differences in the paternal labour supply. Work Employ Soc. 2016;30(2):256-274.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015578999
|
||
|
||
104. Kotsadam A, Finseraas H. The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: causal effects of paternity leave. Soc Sci Res. 2011;40(6):1611-1622.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.011
|
||
|
||
105. Kotsadam A, Finseraas H. Causal effects of parental leave on adolescents' household work. Social Forces. 2013;92(1):329-351.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot044
|
||
|
||
106. Rønsen M, Kitterød RH. Gender-equalizing family policies and mothers' entry into paid work: recent evidence from Norway. Fem Econ. 2015;21(1):59-89.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.927584
|
||
|
||
107. Dale-Olsen H. Sickness absence, sick leave pay, and pay schemes. Labour. 2014;28(1):40-63.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12022
|
||
|
||
108. Hall C, Hartman L. Moral hazard among the sick and unemployed: evidence from a Swedish social insurance reform. Empir Econ. 2010;39(1):27-50.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0293-7
|
||
|
||
109. Henrekson M, Persson M. The effects on sick leave of changes in the sickness insurance system. J Labor Econ. 2004;22(1):87-113.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1086/380404
|
||
|
||
110. Johansson P, Palme M. Assessing the effect of public policy on worker absenteeism. J Hum Resour. 2002;37(2):381-409.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.2307/3069652
|
||
|
||
111. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K. The effects of a sick pay reform on absence and on health-related outcomes. J Health Econ. 2010;29(2):285-302.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.01.003
|
||
|
||
112. Olsson M, Thoursie PS. Sickness insurance and spousal labour supply. Labour Econ. 2015;33:41-54.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.005
|
||
|
||
113. Ziebarth NR. Long-term absenteeism and moral hazard: evidence from a natural experiment. Labour Econ. 2013;24:277-292.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.09.004
|
||
|
||
114. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
|
||
|
||
115. Thyrian JR, Fendrich K, Lange A, Haas JP, Zygmunt M, Hoffmann W. Changing maternity leave policy: short-term effects on fertility rates and demographic variables in Germany. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(4):672-676.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.004
|
||
|
||
116. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K. The effects of parental leave extension on training for young women. J Popul Econ. 2011;24(2):731-760.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0295-y
|
||
|
||
117. Escobedo A, Wall K. Leave policies in Southern Europe: continuities and changes. Community, Work & Family. 2015;18(2):218235.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1024822
|
||
|
||
118. Milkman R, Appelbaum E. Unfinished Business: Paid Family Leave in California and the Future of US Work-Family Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2013.
|
||
https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801452383.001.0001
|
||
|
||
|
||
Do not use your browser's 'BACK' button.
|
||
Use the 'RESET' button to submit more references.
|
||
|
||
We now provide space to match 1,000 references per submission
|
||
|
||
To learn about other services and interfaces see our MetaData Delivery page.
|
||
|
||
Please contact us if you have any questions.
|
||
|
||
Tips:
|
||
There should be no line breaks within an individual reference.
|
||
When submitting multiple references they must be in alphabetical order or presented as a numbered list.
|
||
To check the accuracy of a reference, click on the link that is returned with the reference.
|
||
You may use any reference style, although it works best if references are formatted in a consistent and standard style. Just cut and paste this example list to try it out:
|
||
1. Boucher RC (2004) New concepts of the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis lung disease. Eur Resp J 23: 146–158.
|
||
2. Knowles MR, Boucher RC (2002) Mucus clearance as a primary innate defense mechanism for mammalian airways. J Clin Investig 109: 571–577.
|
||
3. Antunes MB, Cohen NA (2007) Mucociliary clearance - a critical upper airway host defense mechanism and methods of assessment. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 7: 5–10.
|
||
4. Riordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem BS, Alon N, Rozmahel R, et al. (1989) Identification of the Cystic-Fibrosis Gene - Cloning and Characterization of Complementary-Dna. Science 245: 1066–1072.
|
||
5. Rommens JM, Iannuzzi MC, Kerem BS, Drumm ML, Melmer G, et al. (1989) Identification of the Cystic-Fibrosis Gene - Chromosome Walking and Jumping. Science 245: 1059–1065.
|
||
6. Bobadilla JL, Macek M, Fine JP, Farrell PM (2002) Cystic fibrosis: A worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations - Correlation with incidence data and application to screening. Human Mutation 19: 575–606.
|
||
7. Qu BH, Thomas PJ (1996) Alteration of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator folding pathway - Effects of the Delta F508 mutation on the thermodynamic stability and folding yield of NBD1. J Biol Chem 271: 7261–7264.
|
||
|