wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/8edd37544edda38e0174b0d7fd2cb350-toroyan-t-and-oakle/info.yaml

116 lines
3.7 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'Aim This paper describes a process evaluation that was conducted
alongside a randomized controlled trial of out-of-home pre-school day
care. The evaluation aimed to: (1) describe the intervention; (2)
document the day care received by participating families; (3) describe
the social context of the trial; and (4) provide data to assist in the
interpretation of trial outcomes.
Methods The setting for the trial was an out-of-home day care Centre in
Hackney, East London. Process data were collected through the use of
questionnaires, interviews, and researcher field-notes. Data from
questionnaires were collected from 120 mothers and included data on 143
children. Interviews were undertaken with 21 participating mothers.
Staff also completed questionnaires and the Head of the Centre was
interviewed. The quality of care provided was assessed using the Early
Childhood Environment Rating Scale.
Results Process data collected during the trial suggest that the day
care provided was education-led, flexible in catering to families''
needs, and was of a very high quality. The social context of the trial
resulted in financial pressures, which may well have influenced the
intervention provided. Data collected through in-depth interviews
suggested that it may be the flexibility of day care that is
particularly important in allowing women to return to paid employment,
but that the loss of benefits when starting work may have meant no
increase in household income.
Conclusion The paper illustrates the value of conducting a process
evaluation alongside a randomized trial, particularly where complex
interventions are involved. In this case, where the intervention was not
provided by the research team, the evaluation allowed an insight into
the content of a multifaceted intervention, which is useful in
interpreting the trial''s results, and in explaining the possible effects
of the social context on the intervention.'
affiliation: 'Toroyan, T (Corresponding Author), Univ London London Sch Hyg \& Trop
Med, Dept Epidemiol \& Populat Hlth, Nutr \& Publ Hlth Intervent Res Unit, 1st Floor,Wolfson
Bldg,Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England.
Univ London London Sch Hyg \& Trop Med, Dept Epidemiol \& Populat Hlth, Nutr \&
Publ Hlth Intervent Res Unit, London WC1E 7HT, England.
Univ London, Inst Educ, Social Sci Res Unit, London WC1N 1AZ, England.
City \& Hackney Primary Care Trust, Child \& Adolescent Serv, London, England.
Univ E Anglia, Sch Med Hlth Policy \& Practice, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England.
Mapledene Early Years Ctr, London, England.'
author: Toroyan, T and Oakley, A and Laing, G and Roberts, I and Mugford, M and Turner,
J
author-email: toroyant@who.int
author_list:
- family: Toroyan
given: T
- family: Oakley
given: A
- family: Laing
given: G
- family: Roberts
given: I
- family: Mugford
given: M
- family: Turner
given: J
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00481.x
files: []
issn: 0305-1862
journal: CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT
keywords: 'evaluation; pre-school day care; household income; social intervention;
randomization'
keywords-plus: HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; DESIGN
language: English
month: NOV
number: '6'
number-of-cited-references: '20'
pages: 691-698
papis_id: 4406412eaafbbc885ff48158354b2837
ref: Toroyan2004impactday
times-cited: '17'
title: 'The impact of day care on socially disadvantaged families: an example of the
use of process evaluation within a randomized controlled trial'
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000224921200014
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
usage-count-since-2013: '5'
volume: '30'
web-of-science-categories: Psychology, Developmental; Pediatrics
year: '2004'