wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/f7bf82069d3f267832b4ad9bde07f01e-binder-barbara-and/info.yaml

114 lines
3.9 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'In recent decades, many affluent democracies moved from traditional
welfare states to workfare systems. Meanwhile, income inequality
developed differently across countries, even when they made apparently
similar shifts from welfare to workfare. It is a matter of debate why
welfare state change had such heterogeneous consequences across
countries. This article proposes that different incentives to take up
low-wage work set by tax reforms in the wake of welfare-to-workfare
transitions alter consequences on inequality in the lower half of the
income distribution. To support this argument, we contrast the trends
between the U.S. and Germany. The German and U.S. tax systems were used
in very different ways to incentivize low-wage work. The U.S. provided
strong incentives to take up low-wage, high-hour work through refundable
tax credits. They act as in-work subsidies and represent an enormous
public income support program. In contrast, in Germany, payroll taxes
were reduced for marginal employment. These jobs were intended to serve
as a stepping stone to full employment. Germany aimed to reduce barriers
to labor market entry, but did not increase subsidies for those working
higher hours in low-wage jobs. We hypothesize that the German path led
to increased income inequality within the lower half of the income
distribution, whereas the large U.S. tax-based subsidies in the U.S.
significantly counteracted it. Decompositions of unconditional quantile
regressions based on the SOEP and the CPS-ASEC for 1992 and 2014
strongly support these assumptions. Households with no labor market
integration lost ground with the workfare reforms in both countries,
increasing inequality in the lower half. However, U.S. households that
conformed to the new workfare system by taking low-wage jobs received
additional after-tax income through tax cuts and credits. This
additional income of the beneficiary households increased the percentile
values between the 10th and 30th percentiles by about 6 per cent, thus
reducing income inequality in the lower half. Germany, on the contrary,
lacked such compensatory subsidies for compliant households. Thus,
increased takeup of low-wage work was associated with an increase in
income inequality in the lower half. We conclude that tax systems are
important in understanding why the shift towards workfare was associated
with heterogeneous trends in income inequality across countries.'
affiliation: 'Binder, B (Corresponding Author), Univ Konstanz, Dept Sociol, Univ Str
10, D-78464 Constance, Germany.
Binder, Barbara, Univ Konstanz, Dept Sociol, Univ Str 10, D-78464 Constance, Germany.
Haupt, Andreas, Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Sociol Media \& Culture Studies, Waldhornstr
27, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.'
article-number: '100712'
author: Binder, Barbara and Haupt, Andreas
author-email: 'barbara.binder@uni-konstanz.de
andreas.haupt@kit.edu'
author_list:
- family: Binder
given: Barbara
- family: Haupt
given: Andreas
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2022.100712
earlyaccessdate: JUL 2022
eissn: 1878-5654
files: []
issn: 0276-5624
journal: RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND MOBILITY
keywords: 'Income inequality; Tax policy; Workfare; Tax credits; Poverty;
Unconditional quantile regression'
keywords-plus: 'WELFARE-STATE; EITC; EMPLOYMENT; POVERTY; POLICY; FAMILIES; BENEFITS;
IMPACTS; POOR'
language: English
month: AUG
number-of-cited-references: '86'
papis_id: 2d6c6c7ea0ebe17fa340c7d50de32e34
ref: Binder2022fundamentalrole
times-cited: '0'
title: The fundamental role of tax systems in the relationship between workfare and
inequality in the lower half of the income distribution
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000829231400002
usage-count-last-180-days: '3'
usage-count-since-2013: '11'
volume: '80'
web-of-science-categories: Sociology
year: '2022'