wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/ef6d599448f8cf710f3fad3006cc0568-hulsegge-g.-and-ott/info.yaml

112 lines
3.6 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'BACKGROUND: Little is known why some organizations employ vulnerable
workers and others do not.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationships between the attitude, intention,
skills and barriers of employers and employment of vulnerable workers.
METHODS: We included 5,601 inclusive organizations (>= 1\% of employees
had a disability, was long-term unemployed or a school dropout) and
6,236 non-inclusive organizations of the Netherlands Employers Work
Survey 2014-2019. We operationalized employer factors based on the
Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction as attitude (negative
impact), intention (mission statement regarding social inclusion),
skills (human resources policies and practices), and barriers (economic
conditions and type of work). We used multivariate-adjusted logistic
regression models.
RESULTS: Compared to non-inclusive organizations, inclusive
organizations had a more negative attitude (OR:0.81) and a stronger
intention to employ vulnerable workers (OR:6.09). Regarding skills,
inclusive organizations had more inclusive human resources practices
(OR:4.83) and initiated more supporting human resources actions
(OR:4.45). Also, they adapted more work conditions towards the needs of
employees (OR:1.52), negotiated about work times and absenteeism
(OR:1.49), and had general human resources practices on, for example,
employability (OR:1.78). Inclusive organizations had less barriers
reflected by better financial results (OR:1.32), more employment
opportunities (OR:1.33) and more appropriate work tasks (OR:1.40).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, inclusive organizations reported more positive
results on the employer factors of the Integrative Model of Behavioral
Prediction, except for a more negative attitude. The more negative
attitude might reflect a more realistic view on the efforts to employ
vulnerable groups, and suggests that other unmeasured emotions and
beliefs are more positive.'
affiliation: 'Hulsegge, G (Corresponding Author), Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res TNO,
Sustainable Prod \& Employabil, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hulsegge, G.; Otten, W.; van de Ven, H. A.; Hazelzet, A. M.; Blonk, R. W. B., Netherlands
Org Appl Sci Res TNO, Sustainable Prod \& Employabil, Leiden, Netherlands.
Blonk, R. W. B., Tilburg Univ, Fac Social \& Behav Sci, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Blonk, R. W. B., North West Univ, Optentia, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.'
author: Hulsegge, G. and Otten, W. and van de Ven, H. A. and Hazelzet, A. M. and Blonk,
R. W. B.
author-email: gerben.hulsegge@tno.nl
author_list:
- family: Hulsegge
given: G.
- family: Otten
given: W.
- family: van de Ven
given: H. A.
- family: Hazelzet
given: A. M.
- family: Blonk
given: R. W. B.
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.3233/WOR-210898
eissn: 1875-9270
files: []
issn: 1051-9815
journal: WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT \& REHABILITATION
keywords: 'Disability; employers; hiring intention; retention; occupational
rehabilitation'
keywords-plus: QUALIFIED WORKERS; DISABLED PEOPLE; DISABILITIES; HRM
language: English
number: '4'
number-of-cited-references: '31'
orcid-numbers: van de Ven, Hardy/0000-0002-0194-2222
pages: 1215-1226
papis_id: a5488eaa8da3b26da1f60193ea845fcd
ref: Hulsegge2022employersattitude
researcherid-numbers: 'Blonk, Roland/HPE-2050-2023
'
times-cited: '1'
title: Employers' attitude, intention, skills and barriers in relation to employment
of vulnerable workers
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000842000100009
usage-count-last-180-days: '3'
usage-count-since-2013: '8'
volume: '72'
web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health
year: '2022'