wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/e18bfbe26feb4fa726d635bde4f5bbf0-dela-cruz-nina-ashl/info.yaml

269 lines
9.3 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'BackgroundMicro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) account
for the vast majority of firms in most economies, particularly in
developing nations, and are key contributors to job creation and global
economic development. However, the most significant impediment to MSME
development in low- and middle-income countries is a lack of access to
both investment and working capital financing. Due to a lack of
essential track record, appropriate collateral, and credit history,
MSMEs are frequently denied business loans by traditional lending
institutions. In addition, SMEs'' inability to access funding is hindered
by institutional, structural, and non-financial factors. To address
this, both the public and private sectors employ indirect and direct
finance interventions to help MSMEs in developing and emerging economies
enhance and increase their financing needs. Given the importance of
MSMEs in the economy, a comprehensive overview of and systematic
synthesizing of the evidence of the effects of financial access
interventions for MSMEs, capturing a wide variety of outcome variables,
is useful. ObjectivesThe objective of this evidence and gap map (EGM) is
to describe the existing evidence on the effects of various
interventions dedicated to supporting and improving MSMEs'' access to
credit, as well as the corresponding firm performance and/or welfare
outcomes. MethodsAn EGM is a systematic evidence product that displays
the existing evidence relevant to a specific research question. An EGM''s
end product is a research article or report, but it can also be shared
via an interactive map drawn as a matrix of included studies and their
corresponding interventions and outcomes. Interventions in low- and
middle-income countries that target specific population subgroups are
included on the map. The EGM considers five types of interventions: (i)
strategy, legislation and regulatory; (ii) systems and institutions;
(iii) facilitate access; (iv) lending instruments or financial products;
and (v) demand-side interventions. The map, on the other hand, covers
outcome domains for policy environment, financial inclusion, firm
performance, and welfare. Impact evaluations or systematic reviews of
relevant interventions for a previously defined target population are
included in the EGM. Studies using experimental or non-experimental
designs, as well as systematic reviews, are eligible. The EGM excludes
before-and-after study designs with no suitable comparison group.
Furthermore, the map excludes literature reviews, key informant
interviews, focus group discussions, and descriptive analyses. Search
strings were used to conduct electronic searches in databases. To ensure
that the research team had identified a significant portion of relevant
research works, the search strategy was supplemented with gray
literature searches and systematic review citation tracking. We have
compiled studies that are either completed or in progress. For practical
reasons, studies are limited to papers written in English and are not
restricted by publication date. Selection CriteriaWe included studies
that examined interventions to enhance MSMEs'' access to finance in low-
and middle-income countries targeting MSMEs including households,
smallholder farmers and single person enterprise as well as financial
institutions/agencies and their staff.
The EGM considers five types of interventions that aim to: (i) deliver
strategy, legislation, and regulatory aspects; (ii) systems and
institutions that enable financing; (iii) facilitate access to finance;
(iv) deliver different lending instruments or financial products,
including traditional forms of microcredit; and (v) demand-side
interventions such as programs on financial literacy. The map includes
outcome domains surrounding policy environment, financial inclusion,
firm performance, and welfare. Eligible studies must be experimental,
non-experimental, or systematic reviews. In addition, the study designs
must have a suitable comparison group before and after the
implementation of interventions. ResultsThe EGM includes 413 studies.
The majority of the studies (379 studies) analyzed microenterprises,
such as households and smallholder farmers; 7 studies analyzed community
groups; while 109 studies analyzed small and medium enterprises. There
were 147 studies on interventions that targeted multiple firm sizes.
Lending instruments/financial products are the most common intervention
across all firm types. When it comes to the types of firms that receive
the said financial intervention, the data is overwhelmingly in favor of
microenterprises (278 studies), followed by systems and organizations
(138 studies) that support better access to such financial products and
services. Welfare outcomes have the most evidence out of all of the
outcomes of interest, followed by firm performance and financial
inclusion. Among all firm types, welfare outcomes are primarily targeted
at microenterprises. With 59 studies, we can say that small businesses
have a significantly large number of enterprise performance outcomes. of
the 413 studies, 243 used non-experimental or quasi-experimental designs
(mainly propensity score matching and instrumental variable approaches),
136 used experimental methods, and 34 were systematic reviews. 175
studies (43\%) provided evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa, 142 studies
(35\%) from South Asia, 86 studies (21\%) from East Asia and the
Pacific, 66 studies (16\%) from Latin America and the Caribbean, 28
studies (7\%), Europe and Central Asia, and 21 studies (5\%) from the
Middle East and North Africa. Most of the included evidence covers
low-income (26\%) and lower-middle income countries (66\%), and to a
lesser extent upper-middle-income countries (26\%). ConclusionThis map
depicts the existing evidence and gaps on the effects of interventions
to enhance MSMEs'' access to financial services in low and middle-income
countries. Interventions directed at microenterprises with welfare
outcomes have a significant number of research outcomes in the
literature. SME evaluations have looked at firm performance, with less
focus to employment and the welfare effects on owners and employees,
including poverty reduction. Microcredit/loans have been the focus of a
large number of research papers (238 studies), indicating the field''s
growing popularity. However, emerging financial interventions such as
facilitating access to digital financial services are relatively
under-studied. Several studies also investigate rural or population in
remote areas with 192 studies, 126 studies on poor and disadvantaged,
and 114 papers on women. Most of the research is conducted in
Sub-Saharan Africa (175 studies) and South Asia (142 studies) so further
research in other regions could be conducted to allow a more holistic
understanding of the effects of financial inclusion interventions.
Credit lines, supply chain finance, and trade financing, which are some
of the ADB''s financial tools have limited evidence. Future studies
should look into strategy, law, and regulation interventions, as well as
interventions targeted at SMEs, and examine policy and regulatory
environment outcomes as well as welfare outcomes. Interventions on the
demand side and their impact on the policy and regulatory environment,
as well as facilitating access are relatively understudied.'
affiliation: 'Dela Cruz, NA (Corresponding Author), Campbell Collaborat, B8 L28 Mark
St, Veraville 3, Las Pinas City 1740, Philippines.
Dela Cruz, Nina Ashley, Campbell Collaborat, Las Pinas City, Philippines.
Villanueva, Alyssa Cyrielle B., Campbell Collaborat, Meycauayan City, Philippines.
Tolin, Lovely Ann, Campbell Collaborat, Quezon City, Philippines.
Disse, Sabrina, Campbell Collaborat, Cologne, Germany.
Lensink, Robert, Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
White, Howard, Campbell Collaborat, New Delhi, India.
Dela Cruz, Nina Ashley, Campbell Collaborat, B8 L28 Mark St, Veraville 3, Las Pinas
City 1740, Philippines.'
article-number: e1341
author: Dela Cruz, Nina Ashley and Villanueva, Alyssa Cyrielle B. and Tolin, Lovely
Ann and Disse, Sabrina and Lensink, Robert and White, Howard
author-email: naodelacruz@gmail.com
author_list:
- family: Dela Cruz
given: Nina Ashley
- family: Villanueva
given: Alyssa Cyrielle B.
- family: Tolin
given: Lovely Ann
- family: Disse
given: Sabrina
- family: Lensink
given: Robert
- family: White
given: Howard
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1002/cl2.1341
eissn: 1891-1803
files: []
journal: CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
language: English
month: SEP
number: '3'
number-of-cited-references: '19'
papis_id: 4b074776086475db07479afe8a5cd591
ref: Delacruz2023protocoleffects
times-cited: '0'
title: 'PROTOCOL: Effects of interventions to improve access to financial services
for micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises in low- and middle-income countries:
An evidence and gap map'
type: article
unique-id: WOS:001022799500001
usage-count-last-180-days: '3'
usage-count-since-2013: '3'
volume: '19'
web-of-science-categories: Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
year: '2023'