wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/cd9e2c2a6cd469ee8800a795809d1fb9-moore-sian-and-onar/info.yaml

103 lines
3.4 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to reassert the
persistent association of the decline in collective bargaining with the
increase in income inequality, the fall in the share of wages in
national income and deterioration in macroeconomic performance in the
UK; and second, to present case studies affirming concrete outcomes of
organisational collective bargaining for workers, in terms of pay, job
quality, working hours and work-life balance.
Design/methodology/approach The paper is based upon two methodological
approaches. First, econometric analyses using industry-level and
firm-level data for advanced and emerging economies testing the
relationship between declining union density, collective bargaining
coverage and the fall in the share of wages in national income. Second,
it reports on ten in-depth case studies of collective bargaining each
based upon analysis of collective bargaining agreements plus in-depth
interviews with the actors party to them: in total, 16 trade union
officers, 16 members and 11 employer representatives. Findings There is
robust evidence of the effects of different measures of bargaining power
on the labour share including union density, welfare state retrenchment,
minimum wages and female employment. The case studies appear to address
a legacy of deregulated industrial relations. A number demonstrate the
reinvigoration of collective bargaining at the organisational and
sectoral level, addressing the two-tier workforce and contractual
differentiation, alongside the consequences of government pay policies
for equality.
Originality/value The paper indicates that there may be limits to
employer commitment to deregulated employment relations. The emergence
of new or reinvigorated collective agreements may represent a concession
by employers that a ``free{''''}, individualised, deinstitutionalised,
precarious approach to industrial relations, based on wage suppression
and work intensification, is not in their interests in the long run.'
affiliation: 'Moore, S (Corresponding Author), Univ Greenwich, Business Sch, London,
England.
Moore, Sian; Onaran, Ozlem; Guschanski, Alexander; Antunes, Bethania; Symon, Graham,
Univ Greenwich, Business Sch, London, England.'
author: Moore, Sian and Onaran, Ozlem and Guschanski, Alexander and Antunes, Bethania
and Symon, Graham
author-email: s.moore@greenwich.ac.uk
author_list:
- family: Moore
given: Sian
- family: Onaran
given: Ozlem
- family: Guschanski
given: Alexander
- family: Antunes
given: Bethania
- family: Symon
given: Graham
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1108/ER-09-2018-0256
eissn: 1758-7069
files: []
issn: 0142-5455
journal: EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
keywords: Collective bargaining; Wages; Trade unions
keywords-plus: INCOME-DISTRIBUTION; GROWTH; DECLINE; POLICY; WAGE
language: English
month: FEB 11
number: 2, SI
number-of-cited-references: '51'
orcid-numbers: Antunes, Bethania/0000-0003-3589-2347
pages: 279-295
papis_id: b21b6f4dbae191294f6203776abc519f
ref: Moore2019resiliencecollective
times-cited: '6'
title: The resilience of collective bargaining - a renewed logic for joint regulation?
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000462071200002
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
usage-count-since-2013: '31'
volume: '41'
web-of-science-categories: Industrial Relations \& Labor; Management
year: '2019'