wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/bed2f1dc7ae79dcc594f6b48b77b1c71-pega-frank-and-cart/info.yaml

206 lines
6.3 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'Background
By improving two social determinants of health (poverty and
unemployment) in low-and middle-income families on or at risk of
welfare, in-work tax credit for families (IWTC) interventions could
impact health status and outcomes in adults.
Objectives
To assess the effects of IWTCs on health outcomes in working-age adults
(18 to 64 years).
Search methods
We searched 16 electronic academic databases, including the Cochrane
Public Health Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 7), MEDLINE and
EMBASE, as well as six grey literature databases between July and
September 2012 for records published between January 1980 and July 2012.
We also searched key organisational websites, handsearched reference
lists of included records and relevant journals, and contacted academic
experts.
Selection criteria
We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials and
cohort, controlled before-and-after (CBA) and interrupted time series
(ITS) studies of IWTCs in working-age adults. Included primary outcomes
were: self rated general health; mental health/psychological distress;
mental illness; overweight/obesity; alcohol use and tobacco use.
Data collection and analysis
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of
bias in included studies. We contacted study authors to obtain missing
information.
Main results
Five studies (one CBA and four ITS) comprising a total of 5,677,383
participants (all women) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were
synthesised narratively. The in-work tax credit intervention assessed in
all included studies is the permanent Earned Income Tax Credit in the
United States, established in 1975. This intervention distributed nearly
USD 62 billion to over 27 million individuals in 2011, and its
administration costs were less than one per cent of its total costs. All
included studies carried a high risk of bias (especially from
confounding and insufficient control for underlying time trends). Due to
the small number of (observational) studies and their high risk of bias,
we judged this body of evidence to have very low overall quality.
One study found that IWTC had no detectable effect on self rated general
health and mental health/psychological distress five years after its
implementation (i.e. a considerable change in the generosity of the
permanent IWTC) and on overweight/obesity eight years after
implementation. One study found no effect of IWTC on tobacco use five
years after implementation, one a moderate reduction in tobacco use one
year after implementation (odds ratio 0.95, 95\% confidence interval
(CI) 0.94 to 0.96), and one differential effects, with no effect in
African-Americans and a large reduction in European-Americans two years
after implementation (risk difference -11.1\%, 95\% CI -20.9\% to
-1.3\%). No evidence was available for the effect of IWTC on mental
illness and alcohol use. No adverse effects of IWTC were identified. One
study also found no detectable effect of IWTC on the number of bad
physical health days and of risky biomarkers for inflammation,
cardiovascular disease and metabolic conditions eight years after
implementation.
One study found that IWTC had a large, positive effect on income from
wages or salaries one year after implementation. Two studies found no
effect on employment two and five years after implementation, whereas
two found a moderate increase five and eight years after implementation
and one a large increase in employment due to IWTC one year after
implementation.
No differences in outcomes between groups with different educational
status were found for self rated health and mental health/psychological
distress. In one study European-American women with lower levels of
education were more likely to reduce tobacco use, while tobacco use did
not change among African-American women with lower levels of education.
However, no differences in tobacco use by educational status were
observed in a second study. Two studies found that the intervention may
have reduced inequity with respect to employment, where women with less
education were more likely to move into employment (although one did not
establish whether this difference was statistically significant), while
two studies found no such difference and no studies found differences by
ethnic group on employment rates.
Authors'' conclusions
In summary, the small and methodologically limited existing body of
evidence with a high risk of bias provides no evidence for an effect of
in-work tax credit for families interventions on health status (except
for mixed evidence for tobacco smoking) in adults.'
affiliation: 'Pega, F (Corresponding Author), Univ Otago, Dept Publ Hlth, Wellington,
New Zealand.
Pega, Frank; Carter, Kristie; Blakely, Tony, Univ Otago, Dept Publ Hlth, Wellington,
New Zealand.
Pega, Frank, Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Lucas, Patricia J., Univ Bristol, Sch Policy Studies, Bristol, Avon, England.'
article-number: CD009963
author: Pega, Frank and Carter, Kristie and Blakely, Tony and Lucas, Patricia J.
author-email: frank.pega@otago.ac.nz
author_list:
- family: Pega
given: Frank
- family: Carter
given: Kristie
- family: Blakely
given: Tony
- family: Lucas
given: Patricia J.
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009963.pub2
eissn: 1361-6137
files: []
issn: 1469-493X
journal: COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
keywords-plus: 'SOCIAL-POLICY PROGRAMS; EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS; INCOME; WELFARE;
UNEMPLOYMENT; POVERTY; INEQUALITIES; BENEFITS; MOTHERS; PEOPLE'
language: English
number: '8'
number-of-cited-references: '88'
orcid-numbers: 'Blakely, Tony/0000-0002-6995-4369
Lucas, Patricia Jane/0000-0002-0469-8085'
papis_id: 13d7a5334bb8d20be3c15a30386305a0
ref: Pega2013inworktax
researcherid-numbers: 'Lucas, Patricia/HNJ-0065-2023
'
tags:
- review
times-cited: '40'
title: In-work tax credits for families and their impact on health status in adults
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000323928900036
usage-count-last-180-days: '1'
usage-count-since-2013: '6'
web-of-science-categories: Medicine, General \& Internal
year: '2013'