119 lines
3.8 KiB
YAML
119 lines
3.8 KiB
YAML
abstract: 'Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors (including
|
|
|
|
conservation payments) that influence household decisions to participate
|
|
|
|
in off-farm work and estimate the impact of participation on household
|
|
|
|
welfare under the auspices of the Grain for Green (GfG) program.
|
|
|
|
Design/methodology/approach The authors used survey data from 225 farm
|
|
|
|
households on the Loess Plateau and addressed the possible sample
|
|
|
|
selection and endogeneity problems by employing a jointly estimated
|
|
|
|
endogenous switching regression (ESR) model. Findings The findings of
|
|
|
|
this paper are as follows: off-farm participation is positively related
|
|
|
|
to households'' educational attainment and negatively related to their
|
|
|
|
land resource endowment and the presence of children; participation in
|
|
|
|
off-farm work exerts positive effects on household income and per capita
|
|
|
|
household income, but negative effects on farm productivity; and
|
|
|
|
conservation payments show no significant impact on off-farm
|
|
|
|
participation, no significant impact on any of the three household
|
|
|
|
welfare indicators for off-farm non-participant households, but a
|
|
|
|
significantly negative impact for off-farm participant households.
|
|
|
|
Originality/value This paper makes two contributions. First, the authors
|
|
|
|
address the selection bias and endogeneity problem of GfG participating
|
|
|
|
households by employing the ESR method and explicitly estimating the
|
|
|
|
treatment effects of off-farm participation on their household welfare.
|
|
|
|
Neglecting these problems leads to biased estimates and misleading
|
|
|
|
policy implications. Second, this analysis stresses the important role
|
|
|
|
of government in reducing market or institutional failure and other
|
|
|
|
barriers that impede farmers'' efficient allocation choices instead of
|
|
|
|
compensating households for conserving sloping land, shedding new light
|
|
|
|
on the most effective policy options to achieve the program''s goals.'
|
|
affiliation: 'Li, L (Corresponding Author), Peking Univ, Sch Urban Planning \& Design,
|
|
Shenzhen Grad Sch, Shenzhen, Peoples R China.
|
|
|
|
Li, Li; MacLachlan, Ian; Li, Guicai; Guo, Yuanyuan, Peking Univ, Sch Urban Planning
|
|
\& Design, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Shenzhen, Peoples R China.
|
|
|
|
Tsunekawa, Atsushi, Tottori Univ, Arid Land Res Ctr, Tottori, Japan.
|
|
|
|
Koike, Atsushi, Kobe Univ, Dept Reg Planning, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.'
|
|
author: Li, Li and Tsunekawa, Atsushi and MacLachlan, Ian and Li, Guicai and Koike,
|
|
Atsushi and Guo, Yuanyuan
|
|
author-email: 920421363@qq.com
|
|
author_list:
|
|
- family: Li
|
|
given: Li
|
|
- family: Tsunekawa
|
|
given: Atsushi
|
|
- family: MacLachlan
|
|
given: Ian
|
|
- family: Li
|
|
given: Guicai
|
|
- family: Koike
|
|
given: Atsushi
|
|
- family: Guo
|
|
given: Yuanyuan
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
|
doi: 10.1108/CAER-06-2018-0124
|
|
eissn: 1756-1388
|
|
files: []
|
|
issn: 1756-137X
|
|
journal: CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW
|
|
keywords: 'Off-farm employment; Grain for Green; Simultaneous equations;
|
|
|
|
Conservation payments; Endogenous switching regression'
|
|
keywords-plus: 'LAND CONVERSION PROGRAM; RURAL NONFARM ACTIVITIES; AGRICULTURAL
|
|
|
|
PRODUCTIVITY; IMPACT; MIGRATION; INCOME; MARKET; CONSTRAINTS; DECISION;
|
|
|
|
POVERTY'
|
|
language: English
|
|
number: '1'
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '59'
|
|
orcid-numbers: 'MacLachlan, Ian/0000-0002-8584-4063
|
|
|
|
Tsunekawa, Atsushi/0000-0002-7690-0633
|
|
|
|
li, li/0000-0002-5976-8474'
|
|
pages: 71-89
|
|
papis_id: 91ae38513a02905bd54c4d9678b375f5
|
|
ref: Li2020conservationpayments
|
|
researcherid-numbers: 'MacLachlan, Ian/J-1839-2012
|
|
|
|
Tsunekawa, Atsushi/L-8526-2013
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
times-cited: '3'
|
|
title: Conservation payments, off-farm employment and household welfare for farmers
|
|
participating in the ``Grain for Green″ program in China Empirical evidence from
|
|
the Loess Plateau
|
|
type: article
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000506407500001
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '10'
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '36'
|
|
volume: '12'
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Agricultural Economics \& Policy; Economics
|
|
year: '2020'
|