wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/adf915806ea6446b382d71655f1cb6bd-reskin-bf/info.yaml

74 lines
2.2 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'Sociologists'' principal contribution to our understanding of ascriptive
inequality has been to document race and sex disparities. We have made
little headway, however, in explaining these disparities because most
research has sought to explain variation across ascriptive groups in
more or less desirable outcomes in terms of allocators'' motives. This
approach has been inconclusive because motive-based theories cannot be
empirically tested. Our reliance on individual-level data and the
balkanization of research on ascriptive inequality into separate
specialties for groups defined by different ascriptive characteristics
have contributed to our explanatory stalemate. Explanation requires
including mechanisms in our models-the specific processes that link
groups'' ascribed characteristics to variable outcomes such as earnings.
I discuss mechanisms that contribute to variation in ascriptive
inequality at four levels of analysis-intrapsychic, interpersonal,
societal, and organizational. Redirecting our attention from motives to
mechanisms is essential for understanding inequality and-equally
important-for contributing meaningfully to social policies that will
promote social equality.'
affiliation: 'Reskin, BF (Corresponding Author), Univ Washington, Dept Sociol, Seattle,
WA 98195 USA.
Univ Washington, Dept Sociol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.'
author: Reskin, BF
author-email: reskin@u.washington.edu
author_list:
- family: Reskin
given: BF
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.2307/3088900
eissn: 1939-8271
files: []
issn: 0003-1224
journal: AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
keywords-plus: 'EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION; RACIAL WAGE INEQUALITY;
LABOR-MARKET; BLACK-WHITE; METROPOLITAN-AREAS; GENDER INEQUALITY;
COGNITIVE SKILL; SEX COMPOSITION; CIVIL-SERVICE; RACE'
language: English
month: FEB
number: '1'
number-of-cited-references: '129'
pages: 1-21
papis_id: d63a135a863c2382a8c4a348f379fd5e
ref: Reskin2003includingmechanisms
tags:
- relevant
- review
times-cited: '334'
title: Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000222055600001
usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
usage-count-since-2013: '74'
volume: '68'
web-of-science-categories: Sociology
year: '2003'