wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/97539241f19ca5fa87a27929078973f3-dunstan-debra-a.-an/info.yaml

107 lines
3.5 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'Purpose: Theoretical and empirical research findings attest to the
workplace being a social environment in which co-workers have a critical
influence on the employment outcomes and return-to-work (RTW) success of
other employees. However, co-workers do not have a formal role in RTW
planning. The aim of this study was to explore how managers responsible
for developing and implementing RTW procedures view the role of
co-workers in this process.
Method: An exploratory qualitative pilot study was conducted in Canada.
Participants (1 male; 13 females; mean experience in RTW = 11.8 years)
were workplace (n=8) or RTW managers (n=6) with direct oversight of RTW
plans. The participants were recruited via invitation from a research
institute and were drawn from three different provinces. Data were
gathered via open-ended questions and were coded and subject to thematic
analysis.
Findings: Three key themes were identified: (1) Managers view RTW as
having little relevance to co-workers but expect them to cooperate with
the arrangements; (2) Formal procedures are inadequate when psychosocial
barriers to work resumption are present, so managers use informal
strategies to engage co-workers'' emotional and social support; and (3)
Managers have difficulty integrating RTW procedures with other legal
obligations, such as privacy and confidentiality requirements.
Conclusion: Existing arrangements for the development and implementation
of RTW are sufficient most of the time, but may be inadequate when an
injured worker presents with psychosocial barriers to work resumption.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
Standard RTW arrangements can be inadequate when a RTW plan requires
active co-worker support.
Privacy and confidentiality provisions can result in managers using
informal procedures for information exchange and to engage co-workers.
The use of risk management strategies - assessment, consultation and
communication - could be used to include co-workers when workplace
issues threaten the success of a RTW plan.'
affiliation: 'Dunstan, DA (Corresponding Author), Univ New England, Sch Behav Cognit
\& Social Sci, Discipline Psychol, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
Dunstan, Debra A., Univ New England, Sch Behav Cognit \& Social Sci, Discipline
Psychol, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
MacEachen, Ellen, Univ Waterloo, Sch Publ Hlth \& Hlth Syst, Waterloo, ON, Canada.'
author: Dunstan, Debra A. and MacEachen, Ellen
author-email: ddunstan@une.edu.au
author_list:
- family: Dunstan
given: Debra A.
- family: MacEachen
given: Ellen
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1129447
eissn: 1464-5165
files: []
issn: 0963-8288
journal: DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
keywords: 'Injury management policy; social context of work; workers'' compensation;
work reintegration'
keywords-plus: 'COMMON MENTAL-DISORDERS; REINTEGRATION PROCESSES; SUPERVISORS;
ATTITUDES; EMPLOYEES; ABSENCE; INJURY; REHABILITATION; ACCOMMODATION;
DISABILITIES'
language: English
number: '23'
number-of-cited-references: '50'
orcid-numbers: Dunstan, Debra/0000-0002-0298-7393
pages: 2324-2333
papis_id: e6f93a2d0ef15f2dfacaf927abfcc50c
ref: Dunstan2016workplacemanagers
times-cited: '5'
title: Workplace managers' view of the role of co-workers in return-to-work
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000381937400008
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
usage-count-since-2013: '16'
volume: '38'
web-of-science-categories: Rehabilitation
year: '2016'