wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/969955d7416bd1b15c65db997a18768a-schenck-rinie-and-b/info.yaml

167 lines
5.5 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'The concepts social fabric and social cohesion refer to complex and
interdependent systems that exist in a community. Social cohesion
includes aspects such as the level of respect people have for each
other, people''s experiences of belonging, identification with the
community, identity, their experiences of social justice, and
participation. Social cohesion is further evident in the extent that
people are accepting each other, taking responsibility for themselves
and others and providing safety and security.
South Africa''s political and racially-based history and the current high
poverty and inequality do not provide a conducive context for a cohesive
society. This is evident in the high prevalence of poverty,
unemployment, crime, substance dependency and the neglect and abuse of
women and children. Facilitating a socially cohesive society is high on
the agenda of the current government, but the current policy frameworks
and institutional structures cannot create a socially cohesive society.
Failing to create a socially cohesive South African society is evident
in the more than 50 000 day labourers who are standing on the street
corners of our cities and towns daily, with the hope to access a job and
an income for the day.
Day labourers are unemployed people, mostly men, making a living by
selling their labour and skills on the street corners of South African
cities and towns. The growing number of day labourers who make a living
in the informal economy is a clear indication that South Africa cannot
absorb the unemployed in the formal economy. In particular, South Africa
is unable to accommodate the low-skilled and uneducated labourers in the
formal labour market. To make a living and survive in the informal
economy imply an insecure existence.
The aim of the article is to describe the socio-economic profile of the
3 830 day labourers interviewed during the first national study in South
Africa as a case study that illustrates the vulnerability of the social
cohesion and social fabric of poor families and communities surviving in
the informal economy. The national study was implemented in two phases.
The first phase lasted approximately two years, which were spent
travelling throughout South Africa to determine on which street corners
and open spaces the day labourers are standing in the cities and towns
of South Africa. This reconnaissance phase of the study resulted in the
estimation that there are at least 50 000 day labourers occupying street
corners of South African towns and cities daily. The second, or
fieldwork, phase of the research consisted of the completion of 3 830
interviews with day labourers throughout South Africa during 2007 and
2008. In this phase, the authors developed the survey instrument,
recruited field workers, provided appropriate training and tested the
questionnaire. This was followed by the sampling, where a combination of
cluster and snowball sampling was used to proportionally represent the
research population. A representative sample of approximately 9\%
enabled meaningful statistical analysis. All ethical principles were
adhered to. The questionnaires were completed with the assistance of
well-trained fieldworkers who were fluent in the languages spoken by the
day labourers.
The results of the study show that, given the high unemployment rate and
slow economic growth in South Africa, the informal economy and day
labouring are here to stay and should be supported with relevant
facilitating policies and institutions/structures. Day labouring is
furthermore a survivalist strategy and it implies an irregular income.
It became clear that the day labourers in general have very low
education and skills levels and will not be able to access formal labour
in the current economic climate.
Day labourers are the result of a vulnerable socially exclusive society.
It will remain in an increasingly vulnerable exclusive society if not
addressed through the implementation of policies and practices that will
enhance social cohesion and strengthen the social fabric of the South
African society.'
affiliation: 'Schenck, R (Corresponding Author), Univ Wes Kaapland, Dept Maatskaplike
Werk, Cape Town, South Africa.
Schenck, Rinie, Univ Wes Kaapland, Dept Maatskaplike Werk, Cape Town, South Africa.
Blaauw, Derick, Noordwes Univ, Skool Vir Ekon Wetenskappe, Potchefstroom, South
Africa.'
author: Schenck, Rinie and Blaauw, Derick
author-email: 'cschenck@uwc.ac.za
Derick.Blaauw@nwu.ac.za'
author_list:
- family: Schenck
given: Rinie
- family: Blaauw
given: Derick
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.17159/2224-7912/2018/v58n1a3
files: []
issn: 0041-4751
journal: TYDSKRIF VIR GEESTESWETENSKAPPE
keywords: 'Day labourers; informal economy; social fabric; social cohesion;
unemployment; poverty; informal employment; migrants; survival;
vulnerability; food insecurity'
language: Afrikaans
month: JAN
number: '1'
number-of-cited-references: '27'
pages: 36-55
papis_id: 0b69263cea23623114e35595ebc5618c
ref: Schenck2018daylabourers
researcherid-numbers: Schenck, Catherina J/O-9605-2014
times-cited: '3'
title: 'Day labourers: A case study of the vulnerability of the social fabric and
cohesion in South Africa''s informal economy'
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000434432400003
usage-count-last-180-days: '1'
usage-count-since-2013: '13'
volume: '58'
web-of-science-categories: Social Issues
year: '2018'