wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/95f843bc52f80e452adfe93c8c4c3eeb-dyer-silke-j.-and-v/info.yaml

169 lines
5.6 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'STUDY QUESTION: How do households recover financially from direct
out-of-pocket payment for government subsidized ART?
SUMMARY ANSWER: After a mean of 3.8 years, there was poor recovery from
initiated financial coping strategies with the poorest households being
disproportionatley affected.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Out-of-pocket payment for health services can
create financial burdens for households and inequities in access to
care. A previous study conducted at a public-academic institution in
South Africa documented that patient co-payment for one cycle of ART
resulted in catastrophic expenditure for one in five households, and
more frequently among the poorest, requiring diverse financial coping
strategies to offset costs.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An observational follow-up study was
conducted similar to 4 years later to assess financial recovery among
the 135 couples who had participated in this previous study. Data were
collected over 12 months from 73 informants.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD: The study was conducted at a
level three referral hospital in the publicacademic health sector of
South Africa. At this institution ART is subsidized but requires patient
co-payments. A purpose-built questionnaire capturing socio-economic
information and recovery from financial coping strategies which had been
activated was administered to all informants. Financial recovery was
defined as the resolution of strategies initiated for the specific
purpose of covering the original ART cycle. Results were analysed by
strategy and household with the latter including analysis by tertiles
based on socio-economic status at the time of the original expenditure.
In addition to descriptive statistics, the Pearson Chi squared test was
used to determine differences between socioeconomic tertiles and
associations between recovery and other variables.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The participation rate in this
follow-up study was 54.1\% with equal representation from the three
socio-economic tertiles. The average duration of follow-up was 46.1
months (+/- 9.78 SD) and respondents'' mean age was 42 years (range
31-52). The recovery rate was below 50\% for four of five strategies
evaluated: 23.1\% of households had re-purchased a sold asset; 23.5\%
had normalized a previous reduction in household spending, 33.8\% had
regained their savings, and 48.7\% were no longer bolstering income
through additional work. Two-thirds of households (60.0\%) had repaid
all loans and debts. The poorest households showed lower rates of
recovery when compared to households in the richest tertile. Complete
recovery from all strategies initiated was reported by only 10
households (13.7\%): 1 of 19 in the lowest tertile, 3 of 30 in the
middle and by 6 of 24 households in the richest tertile (P > 0.05). No
association was found between the degree of financial recovery and
additional cost burdens incurred, including related to babies born; or
between the degree of recovery and ongoing pursuit of ART.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size was limited. The
participation rate was just over 50\%. Results were dependent on
participants'' narrative and recall.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The willingness of patients to pay
for ART does not necessarily imply the ability to pay. As a result, the
lack of comprehensive third-party funding for ART can create immediate
and long-term financial hardship which is more pronounced among poorer
households. While more data on the impact of out-of-pocket payment for
ART are needed to illustrate the problem in other low resource settings,
the results from South Africa provide useful information for similar
developing countries. The current absence of more extensive data should
therefore not be a barrier to the promotion of financial risk protection
for infertile couples, especially the poorest, in need of ART.'
affiliation: 'Dyer, SJ (Corresponding Author), Groote Schuur Hosp, Dept Obstet \&
Gynaecol, Main Rd, ZA-7925 Observatory, South Africa.
Dyer, Silke J.; Vinoos, Latiefa, Univ Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hosp, Dept Obstet
\& Gynaecol, Main Rd, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa.
Dyer, Silke J.; Vinoos, Latiefa, Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Main Rd, ZA-7925
Cape Town, South Africa.
Ataguba, John E., Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Hlth Econ Unit, Anzio Rd, ZA-7925
Cape Town, South Africa.'
author: Dyer, Silke J. and Vinoos, Latiefa and Ataguba, John E.
author-email: silke.dyer@uct.ac.za
author_list:
- family: Dyer
given: Silke J.
- family: Vinoos
given: Latiefa
- family: Ataguba
given: John E.
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex315
eissn: 1460-2350
files: []
issn: 0268-1161
journal: HUMAN REPRODUCTION
keywords: 'assisted reproductive technology; out-of-pocket payment; infertility;
health economics; Africa; health expenditures; income; developing
countries'
keywords-plus: 'DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; COPING STRATEGIES; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; HEALTH-CARE;
INFERTILITY; CONSEQUENCES; PATIENT; SECTOR; COSTS; INDIA'
language: English
month: DEC
number: '12'
number-of-cited-references: '24'
orcid-numbers: Ataguba, John Ele-Ojo/0000-0002-7746-3826
pages: 2431-2436
papis_id: e26809c535eaccc1443b0d3896d625b1
ref: Dyer2017poorrecovery
times-cited: '8'
title: Poor recovery of households from out-of-pocket payment for assisted reproductive
technology
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000417055700009
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
usage-count-since-2013: '7'
volume: '32'
web-of-science-categories: Obstetrics \& Gynecology; Reproductive Biology
year: '2017'