111 lines
3.6 KiB
YAML
111 lines
3.6 KiB
YAML
abstract: 'Background: Since the advent of health user fees in low- and
|
|
|
|
middle-income countries in the 1980s, the discourse of global health
|
|
|
|
actors (GHAs) has changed to the disadvantage of this type of healthcare
|
|
|
|
financing mechanism. The aim of the study was to identify and analyze
|
|
|
|
the stance of GHAs in the debate on user fees.
|
|
|
|
Methods: We conducted documentary research using public documents
|
|
|
|
published by and officially attributed to GHAs from 2005 to 2011. We
|
|
|
|
categorized GHAs into four groups: intergovernmental organizations,
|
|
|
|
international non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and
|
|
|
|
working groups and networks. We then classified the GHAs according to
|
|
|
|
their stance relative to the abolition of user fees, and conducted a
|
|
|
|
thematic analysis of their discourse to understand the arguments used by
|
|
|
|
each GHA to justify its stance.
|
|
|
|
Results: We identified 56 GHAs, for which we analyzed 140 documents.
|
|
|
|
Among them, 55\% were in favor of the abolition of user fees or in favor
|
|
|
|
of free care at the point of delivery. None of the GHAs stated that they
|
|
|
|
were in favor of user fees; however, 30\% did not take a stand. Only the
|
|
|
|
World Bank declares that it is both in favor of user fees and in favor
|
|
|
|
of free care at point of service. GHAs generally circumscribe their
|
|
|
|
stance to specific populations (pregnant women, children under 5 years,
|
|
|
|
etc.) or to specific health services (primary, basic, essential). Three
|
|
|
|
types of arguments are used by GHAs to justify their stance: economic,
|
|
|
|
moral and ethical, and pragmatic.
|
|
|
|
Conclusions: The principle of ``user pays{''''} seems to have fizzled.
|
|
|
|
Production and dissemination of evidence, as well as certain advocacy
|
|
|
|
networks, may have contributed to this change in discourse. However,
|
|
|
|
GHAs should go a step further and translate their words into action, so
|
|
|
|
that free healthcare at the point of delivery becomes a reality in low-
|
|
|
|
and middle-income countries. They should provide technical and financial
|
|
|
|
support to those countries that have chosen to implement user fee
|
|
|
|
exemption policies, sometimes influenced by a GHA.'
|
|
affiliation: 'Robert, E (Corresponding Author), Univ Montreal, Fac Med, CRCHUM, Pavillon
|
|
Masson,3850,Rue St Urbain, Montreal, PQ H2W 1T7C, Canada.
|
|
|
|
Robert, Emilie; Ridde, Valery, Univ Montreal, Fac Med, CRCHUM, Montreal, PQ H2W
|
|
1T7C, Canada.
|
|
|
|
Ridde, Valery, Univ Montreal, Dept Med Social \& Prevent, Montreal, PQ H2W 1T7C,
|
|
Canada.'
|
|
article-number: '29'
|
|
author: Robert, Emilie and Ridde, Valery
|
|
author-email: emilie.robert.3@umontreal.ca
|
|
author_list:
|
|
- family: Robert
|
|
given: Emilie
|
|
- family: Ridde
|
|
given: Valery
|
|
da: '2023-09-28'
|
|
doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-29
|
|
eissn: 1744-8603
|
|
files: []
|
|
journal: GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH
|
|
keywords: 'User fees; LMICs; International health policy; Global health actors;
|
|
|
|
Policy change'
|
|
keywords-plus: 'LOW-INCOME COUNTRIES; STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; POLICY;
|
|
CARE;
|
|
|
|
COVERAGE; LESSONS; REFORMS; AFRICA; NEED'
|
|
language: English
|
|
month: JUL 26
|
|
number-of-cited-references: '111'
|
|
orcid-numbers: 'Ridde, Valery/0000-0001-9299-8266
|
|
|
|
Robert, Emilie/0000-0002-2260-1873'
|
|
papis_id: 6221ddb94e462dd475bda1a9c1633311
|
|
ref: Robert2013globalhealth
|
|
researcherid-numbers: 'ridde, valery/AAV-1016-2020
|
|
|
|
Ridde, Valery/AAD-2736-2019
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
times-cited: '32'
|
|
title: 'Global health actors no longer in favor of user fees: a documentary study'
|
|
type: article
|
|
unique-id: WOS:000323004200001
|
|
usage-count-last-180-days: '0'
|
|
usage-count-since-2013: '7'
|
|
volume: '9'
|
|
web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health
|
|
year: '2013'
|