wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/686f026983b6b2a221854a9b67bc4ad2-apotsos-alex/info.yaml

103 lines
3.4 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'Urban decision-makers in South Africa face growing challenges related to
rapidly expanding populations and a changing climate. To help target
limited resources, municipalities have begun to conduct climate change
vulnerability assessments. Many of these assessments take a holistic
approach that combines both physical hazard exposure and the underlying
socio-economic conditions that predispose populations to harm (i.e.,
social vulnerability). Given the increasing use of socio-economic
conditions in climate change vulnerability analyses, this paper seeks to
explore two key research questions: 1) can the spatial distribution of
relative social vulnerability be estimated in six mostly urban South
African municipalities, and if so, 2) how sensitive are the results to a
range of subjective methodological choices often required when
implementing this type of analysis. Here, social vulnerability is
estimated using socio-economic and demographic data from the 2001 and
2011 South African censuses. In all six municipalities, social
vulnerability varies spatially, driven primarily by differences in
income, assets, wealth, employment and education, and secondarily by
differences in access to services and demographics. Even though social
vulnerability is estimated from a wide array of population
characteristics, the spatial distribution is surprising similar to that
of the percent of working-age individuals making less than 800 rand per
month. Areas with high percentages of previously disadvantaged, extended
family, and informal households tend to display relatively higher levels
of social vulnerability. In fact, demographics (e.g., race, language,
age) are often highly correlated with other characteristics that have
direct ties to social vulnerability (e.g., income, employment,
education). The spatial patterns of relative social vulnerability are
similar in 2001 and 2011. However, there is some evidence social
vulnerability is relatively lower in 2011. While the choice of input
data and aggregation method can affect the spatial distribution of
social vulnerability, the general spatial patterns appear to be fairly
robust across a number of subjective choices related to methodological
and aggregation approach, spatial resolution, and input data.'
affiliation: 'Apotsos, A (Corresponding Author), Williams Coll, Geosci Dept, Clark
Hall,947 Main St, Williamstown, MA 01267 USA.
Apotsos, Alex, Williams Coll, Geosci Dept, Clark Hall,947 Main St, Williamstown,
MA 01267 USA.'
author: Apotsos, Alex
author-email: aa13@williams.edu
author_list:
- family: Apotsos
given: Alex
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.02.012
eissn: 1873-7730
files: []
issn: 0143-6228
journal: APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
keywords: Social vulnerability; South Africa; Urban municipalities; Mapping
keywords-plus: 'CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; NATURAL HAZARDS;
ASSESSMENTS; VARIABILITY; INDICATORS; CHALLENGES; HOUSEHOLDS; DYNAMICS;
LEVEL'
language: English
month: APR
number-of-cited-references: '69'
pages: 86-101
papis_id: 37854f606fb529dbbfcd4cbd40524e5a
ref: Apotsos2019mappingrelative
times-cited: '16'
title: Mapping relative social vulnerability in six mostly urban municipalities in
South Africa
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000464479200008
usage-count-last-180-days: '3'
usage-count-since-2013: '20'
volume: '105'
web-of-science-categories: Geography
year: '2019'