wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/41f7ec6ca297a369ad8655377bb09496-giannotti-mariana-a/info.yaml

108 lines
3.7 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'Accessibility measures have been extensively used to explore the
outcomes of the spatial distribution of transport, jobs, and population
groups in cities. Despite its wide use, identifying the population
groups that most benefit from accessibility is not straightforward and
different metrics might result in different conclusions. The present
work aims to analyze the potential bias of using gravity-based measures
based on revealed mobilities to identify job accessibility inequalities.
By looking at two large and very different regions, the municipality of
Sa similar to o Paulo (SP) and the Greater London Area (GLA), we argue
that distance decay functions built from current trip behaviors should
be carefully used in evaluations of accessibility inequalities because
it may underestimate disparities between socio-occupational groups and
also result in a misleading interpretation of impedance factors. Two
distinct approaches were implemented to support those claims. We first
estimate group-specific distance decay functions, considering only
travel time. Secondly, we consider both travel time and travel cost
relative to income to estimate zone-specific and city-specific distance
decay functions for each one of the study areas. The population of both
cases studies was stratified according to the NS-SEC standard to select
the highest and the lowest socio-occupational groups and to explore job
accessibility inequalities. It was found that higherlevel and
lower-level socio-occupational groups of SP and GLA present striking
differences in terms of travel times and relative travel costs, with SP
being more unequal. By applying the distance decay function of the
lowest level socio-occupational group to the calculations of the job
accessibility of the highest level group, and by adding travel cost to
the analysis, we highlight inconsistencies between gravity-based
accessibility calculations and theory, as trips taken by different
groups can be mistakenly associated with willingness to travel. From a
policy perspective, our findings emphasize that accessibility
inequalities in large urban centers, especially in the Global South, can
be underestimated if revealed mobilities are considered to represent the
willingness to travel and by not taking into account the relative cost
of travel.'
affiliation: 'Giannotti, M (Corresponding Author), Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Metropolitan
Studies, Lab Geospatial Anal Polytech Sch, BR-05508070 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Giannotti, Mariana; Tomasiello, Diego B.; Bittencourt, Taina A., Univ Sao Paulo,
Ctr Metropolitan Studies, Lab Geospatial Anal Polytech Sch, BR-05508070 Sao Paulo,
SP, Brazil.'
article-number: '103337'
author: Giannotti, Mariana and Tomasiello, Diego B. and Bittencourt, Taina A.
author-email: mariana.giannotti@usp.br
author_list:
- family: Giannotti
given: Mariana
- family: Tomasiello
given: Diego B.
- family: Bittencourt
given: Taina A.
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103337
earlyaccessdate: APR 2022
eissn: 1873-1236
files: []
issn: 0966-6923
journal: JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
keywords: Accessibility measures; Inequalities; Public transport
keywords-plus: 'JOB ACCESSIBILITY; TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY; SPATIAL EQUITY; SAO-PAULO;
EDUCATION; COST; TIME; CITY; CARE'
language: English
month: MAY
number-of-cited-references: '44'
papis_id: c241d793289e08478922023534db352b
ref: Giannotti2022biasestimating
times-cited: '6'
title: The bias in estimating accessibility inequalities using gravity-based metrics
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000798115800003
usage-count-last-180-days: '7'
usage-count-since-2013: '13'
volume: '101'
web-of-science-categories: Economics; Geography; Transportation
year: '2022'